Cargando…

Low-cost Negative-pressure Wound Therapy Using Wall Vacuum: A 15 Dollars by Day Alternative

BACKGROUND: Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been marketed for about 20 years and remains popular. The only real obstacle to NPWT is the cost; therefore, we designed an inexpensive NPWT connected to a wall vacuum. Here, we report the feasibility and safety of this product, which we call PR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaput, Benoit, Garrido, Ignacio, Eburdery, Harold, Grolleau, Jean Louis, Chavoin, Jean Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26180719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000347
_version_ 1782380104279654400
author Chaput, Benoit
Garrido, Ignacio
Eburdery, Harold
Grolleau, Jean Louis
Chavoin, Jean Pierre
author_facet Chaput, Benoit
Garrido, Ignacio
Eburdery, Harold
Grolleau, Jean Louis
Chavoin, Jean Pierre
author_sort Chaput, Benoit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been marketed for about 20 years and remains popular. The only real obstacle to NPWT is the cost; therefore, we designed an inexpensive NPWT connected to a wall vacuum. Here, we report the feasibility and safety of this product, which we call PROVACUUM (Z-Biotech, Saint-Avertin, France). METHODS: As a first step, the constraints imposed on the manufacturer were equipment quality similar to that of commercial NPWT systems, with an average treatment cost of $15/d. Then, we conducted a prospective study of patients with indications for NPWT from September 2013 to January 2015. Data collected included ease of use, quality of materials, and occurrence of complications during treatment. RESULTS: We enrolled 23 patients with a mean age of 50.8 years. The average duration of treatment was 8.5 days (range, 3–21 days). The dressings were changed every 3.3 days (range, 2–4 days). Two hematomas occurred that required surgical revision and the transfusion of 2 units after large debridement of pressure ulcer. No other adverse events or infections occurred. The surgeons found that our device was similar to commercial NPWT devices. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an inexpensive NPWT that costs an average of $15/d. Our process is not intended to replace portable or stand-alone devices with batteries, but rather offers a less expensive alternative for hospitalized patients and makes NPWT accessible to the most precarious countries and institutions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4494488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44944882015-07-15 Low-cost Negative-pressure Wound Therapy Using Wall Vacuum: A 15 Dollars by Day Alternative Chaput, Benoit Garrido, Ignacio Eburdery, Harold Grolleau, Jean Louis Chavoin, Jean Pierre Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Ideas and Innovations BACKGROUND: Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been marketed for about 20 years and remains popular. The only real obstacle to NPWT is the cost; therefore, we designed an inexpensive NPWT connected to a wall vacuum. Here, we report the feasibility and safety of this product, which we call PROVACUUM (Z-Biotech, Saint-Avertin, France). METHODS: As a first step, the constraints imposed on the manufacturer were equipment quality similar to that of commercial NPWT systems, with an average treatment cost of $15/d. Then, we conducted a prospective study of patients with indications for NPWT from September 2013 to January 2015. Data collected included ease of use, quality of materials, and occurrence of complications during treatment. RESULTS: We enrolled 23 patients with a mean age of 50.8 years. The average duration of treatment was 8.5 days (range, 3–21 days). The dressings were changed every 3.3 days (range, 2–4 days). Two hematomas occurred that required surgical revision and the transfusion of 2 units after large debridement of pressure ulcer. No other adverse events or infections occurred. The surgeons found that our device was similar to commercial NPWT devices. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an inexpensive NPWT that costs an average of $15/d. Our process is not intended to replace portable or stand-alone devices with batteries, but rather offers a less expensive alternative for hospitalized patients and makes NPWT accessible to the most precarious countries and institutions. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4494488/ /pubmed/26180719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000347 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Ideas and Innovations
Chaput, Benoit
Garrido, Ignacio
Eburdery, Harold
Grolleau, Jean Louis
Chavoin, Jean Pierre
Low-cost Negative-pressure Wound Therapy Using Wall Vacuum: A 15 Dollars by Day Alternative
title Low-cost Negative-pressure Wound Therapy Using Wall Vacuum: A 15 Dollars by Day Alternative
title_full Low-cost Negative-pressure Wound Therapy Using Wall Vacuum: A 15 Dollars by Day Alternative
title_fullStr Low-cost Negative-pressure Wound Therapy Using Wall Vacuum: A 15 Dollars by Day Alternative
title_full_unstemmed Low-cost Negative-pressure Wound Therapy Using Wall Vacuum: A 15 Dollars by Day Alternative
title_short Low-cost Negative-pressure Wound Therapy Using Wall Vacuum: A 15 Dollars by Day Alternative
title_sort low-cost negative-pressure wound therapy using wall vacuum: a 15 dollars by day alternative
topic Ideas and Innovations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26180719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000347
work_keys_str_mv AT chaputbenoit lowcostnegativepressurewoundtherapyusingwallvacuuma15dollarsbydayalternative
AT garridoignacio lowcostnegativepressurewoundtherapyusingwallvacuuma15dollarsbydayalternative
AT eburderyharold lowcostnegativepressurewoundtherapyusingwallvacuuma15dollarsbydayalternative
AT grolleaujeanlouis lowcostnegativepressurewoundtherapyusingwallvacuuma15dollarsbydayalternative
AT chavoinjeanpierre lowcostnegativepressurewoundtherapyusingwallvacuuma15dollarsbydayalternative