Cargando…

Clinical utility of brain stimulation modalities following traumatic brain injury: current evidence

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains the main cause of disability and a major public health problem worldwide. This review focuses on the neurophysiology of TBI, and the rationale and current state of evidence of clinical application of brain stimulation to promote TBI recovery, particularly on cons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Shasha, Zaninotto, Ana Luiza, Neville, Iuri Santana, Paiva, Wellingson Silva, Nunn, Danuza, Fregni, Felipe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170670
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S65816
_version_ 1782380131066576896
author Li, Shasha
Zaninotto, Ana Luiza
Neville, Iuri Santana
Paiva, Wellingson Silva
Nunn, Danuza
Fregni, Felipe
author_facet Li, Shasha
Zaninotto, Ana Luiza
Neville, Iuri Santana
Paiva, Wellingson Silva
Nunn, Danuza
Fregni, Felipe
author_sort Li, Shasha
collection PubMed
description Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains the main cause of disability and a major public health problem worldwide. This review focuses on the neurophysiology of TBI, and the rationale and current state of evidence of clinical application of brain stimulation to promote TBI recovery, particularly on consciousness, cognitive function, motor impairments, and psychiatric conditions. We discuss the mechanisms of different brain stimulation techniques including major noninvasive and invasive stimulations. Thus far, most noninvasive brain stimulation interventions have been nontargeted and focused on the chronic phase of recovery after TBI. In the acute stages, there is limited available evidence of the efficacy and safety of brain stimulation to improve functional outcomes. Comparing the studies across different techniques, transcranial direct current stimulation is the intervention that currently has the higher number of properly designed clinical trials, though total number is still small. We recognize the need for larger studies with target neuroplasticity modulation to fully explore the benefits of brain stimulation to effect TBI recovery during different stages of recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4494620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44946202015-07-13 Clinical utility of brain stimulation modalities following traumatic brain injury: current evidence Li, Shasha Zaninotto, Ana Luiza Neville, Iuri Santana Paiva, Wellingson Silva Nunn, Danuza Fregni, Felipe Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Review Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains the main cause of disability and a major public health problem worldwide. This review focuses on the neurophysiology of TBI, and the rationale and current state of evidence of clinical application of brain stimulation to promote TBI recovery, particularly on consciousness, cognitive function, motor impairments, and psychiatric conditions. We discuss the mechanisms of different brain stimulation techniques including major noninvasive and invasive stimulations. Thus far, most noninvasive brain stimulation interventions have been nontargeted and focused on the chronic phase of recovery after TBI. In the acute stages, there is limited available evidence of the efficacy and safety of brain stimulation to improve functional outcomes. Comparing the studies across different techniques, transcranial direct current stimulation is the intervention that currently has the higher number of properly designed clinical trials, though total number is still small. We recognize the need for larger studies with target neuroplasticity modulation to fully explore the benefits of brain stimulation to effect TBI recovery during different stages of recovery. Dove Medical Press 2015-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4494620/ /pubmed/26170670 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S65816 Text en © 2015 Li et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Li, Shasha
Zaninotto, Ana Luiza
Neville, Iuri Santana
Paiva, Wellingson Silva
Nunn, Danuza
Fregni, Felipe
Clinical utility of brain stimulation modalities following traumatic brain injury: current evidence
title Clinical utility of brain stimulation modalities following traumatic brain injury: current evidence
title_full Clinical utility of brain stimulation modalities following traumatic brain injury: current evidence
title_fullStr Clinical utility of brain stimulation modalities following traumatic brain injury: current evidence
title_full_unstemmed Clinical utility of brain stimulation modalities following traumatic brain injury: current evidence
title_short Clinical utility of brain stimulation modalities following traumatic brain injury: current evidence
title_sort clinical utility of brain stimulation modalities following traumatic brain injury: current evidence
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170670
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S65816
work_keys_str_mv AT lishasha clinicalutilityofbrainstimulationmodalitiesfollowingtraumaticbraininjurycurrentevidence
AT zaninottoanaluiza clinicalutilityofbrainstimulationmodalitiesfollowingtraumaticbraininjurycurrentevidence
AT nevilleiurisantana clinicalutilityofbrainstimulationmodalitiesfollowingtraumaticbraininjurycurrentevidence
AT paivawellingsonsilva clinicalutilityofbrainstimulationmodalitiesfollowingtraumaticbraininjurycurrentevidence
AT nunndanuza clinicalutilityofbrainstimulationmodalitiesfollowingtraumaticbraininjurycurrentevidence
AT fregnifelipe clinicalutilityofbrainstimulationmodalitiesfollowingtraumaticbraininjurycurrentevidence