Cargando…

Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes?

PURPOSE: To determine whether robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may be taught to chief residents and fellows without influencing operative outcomes. METHODS: Between August 2011 and June 2012, 388 patients underwent RARP by a single primary surgeon (DIL) at our institution. Our teaching al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Ziho, Lightfoot, Andrew J., Mucksavage, Phillip, Lee, David I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2015.03.005
_version_ 1782380135151828992
author Lee, Ziho
Lightfoot, Andrew J.
Mucksavage, Phillip
Lee, David I.
author_facet Lee, Ziho
Lightfoot, Andrew J.
Mucksavage, Phillip
Lee, David I.
author_sort Lee, Ziho
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine whether robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may be taught to chief residents and fellows without influencing operative outcomes. METHODS: Between August 2011 and June 2012, 388 patients underwent RARP by a single primary surgeon (DIL) at our institution. Our teaching algorithm divides RARP into five stages, and each trainee progresses through the stages in a sequential manner. Statistical analysis was conducted after grouping the cohort according to the surgeons operating the robotic console: attending only (n = 91), attending and fellow (n = 152), and attending and chief resident (n = 145). Approximately normal variables were compared utilizing one-way analysis of variance, and categorical variables were compared utilizing two-tailed χ(2) test; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There was no difference in mean age (P = 0.590), body mass index (P = 0.339), preoperative SHIM (Sexual Health Inventory for Men) score (P = 0.084), preoperative AUASS (American Urologic Association Symptom Score) (P = 0.086), preoperative prostate-specific antigen (P = 0.258), clinical and pathological stage (P = 0.766 and P = 0.699, respectively), and preoperative and postoperative Gleason score (P = 0.775 and P = 0.870, respectively). Operative outcomes such as mean estimated blood loss (P = 0.807) and length of stay (P = 0.494) were similar. There was a difference in mean operative time (P < 0.001; attending only = 89.3 min, attending and fellow 125.4 min, and attending and chief resident 126.9 min). Functional outcomes at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively such as urinary continence rate (P = 0.977 and P = 0.720, respectively), and SHIM score (P = 0.661 and P = 0.890, respectively) were similar. The rate of positive surgical margins (P = 0.058) was similar. CONCLUSIONS: Training chief residents and fellows to perform RARP may be associated with increased operative times, but does not compromise short-term functional and oncological outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4494638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Asian Pacific Prostate Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44946382015-07-08 Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes? Lee, Ziho Lightfoot, Andrew J. Mucksavage, Phillip Lee, David I. Prostate Int Original Article PURPOSE: To determine whether robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may be taught to chief residents and fellows without influencing operative outcomes. METHODS: Between August 2011 and June 2012, 388 patients underwent RARP by a single primary surgeon (DIL) at our institution. Our teaching algorithm divides RARP into five stages, and each trainee progresses through the stages in a sequential manner. Statistical analysis was conducted after grouping the cohort according to the surgeons operating the robotic console: attending only (n = 91), attending and fellow (n = 152), and attending and chief resident (n = 145). Approximately normal variables were compared utilizing one-way analysis of variance, and categorical variables were compared utilizing two-tailed χ(2) test; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There was no difference in mean age (P = 0.590), body mass index (P = 0.339), preoperative SHIM (Sexual Health Inventory for Men) score (P = 0.084), preoperative AUASS (American Urologic Association Symptom Score) (P = 0.086), preoperative prostate-specific antigen (P = 0.258), clinical and pathological stage (P = 0.766 and P = 0.699, respectively), and preoperative and postoperative Gleason score (P = 0.775 and P = 0.870, respectively). Operative outcomes such as mean estimated blood loss (P = 0.807) and length of stay (P = 0.494) were similar. There was a difference in mean operative time (P < 0.001; attending only = 89.3 min, attending and fellow 125.4 min, and attending and chief resident 126.9 min). Functional outcomes at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively such as urinary continence rate (P = 0.977 and P = 0.720, respectively), and SHIM score (P = 0.661 and P = 0.890, respectively) were similar. The rate of positive surgical margins (P = 0.058) was similar. CONCLUSIONS: Training chief residents and fellows to perform RARP may be associated with increased operative times, but does not compromise short-term functional and oncological outcomes. Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2015-06 2015-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4494638/ /pubmed/26157767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2015.03.005 Text en © 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Prostate International. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Ziho
Lightfoot, Andrew J.
Mucksavage, Phillip
Lee, David I.
Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes?
title Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes?
title_full Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes?
title_fullStr Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes?
title_full_unstemmed Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes?
title_short Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes?
title_sort can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2015.03.005
work_keys_str_mv AT leeziho canrobotassistedradicalprostatectomybetaughttochiefresidentsandfellowswithoutaffectingoperativeoutcomes
AT lightfootandrewj canrobotassistedradicalprostatectomybetaughttochiefresidentsandfellowswithoutaffectingoperativeoutcomes
AT mucksavagephillip canrobotassistedradicalprostatectomybetaughttochiefresidentsandfellowswithoutaffectingoperativeoutcomes
AT leedavidi canrobotassistedradicalprostatectomybetaughttochiefresidentsandfellowswithoutaffectingoperativeoutcomes