Cargando…
Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes?
PURPOSE: To determine whether robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may be taught to chief residents and fellows without influencing operative outcomes. METHODS: Between August 2011 and June 2012, 388 patients underwent RARP by a single primary surgeon (DIL) at our institution. Our teaching al...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian Pacific Prostate Society
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2015.03.005 |
_version_ | 1782380135151828992 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Ziho Lightfoot, Andrew J. Mucksavage, Phillip Lee, David I. |
author_facet | Lee, Ziho Lightfoot, Andrew J. Mucksavage, Phillip Lee, David I. |
author_sort | Lee, Ziho |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To determine whether robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may be taught to chief residents and fellows without influencing operative outcomes. METHODS: Between August 2011 and June 2012, 388 patients underwent RARP by a single primary surgeon (DIL) at our institution. Our teaching algorithm divides RARP into five stages, and each trainee progresses through the stages in a sequential manner. Statistical analysis was conducted after grouping the cohort according to the surgeons operating the robotic console: attending only (n = 91), attending and fellow (n = 152), and attending and chief resident (n = 145). Approximately normal variables were compared utilizing one-way analysis of variance, and categorical variables were compared utilizing two-tailed χ(2) test; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There was no difference in mean age (P = 0.590), body mass index (P = 0.339), preoperative SHIM (Sexual Health Inventory for Men) score (P = 0.084), preoperative AUASS (American Urologic Association Symptom Score) (P = 0.086), preoperative prostate-specific antigen (P = 0.258), clinical and pathological stage (P = 0.766 and P = 0.699, respectively), and preoperative and postoperative Gleason score (P = 0.775 and P = 0.870, respectively). Operative outcomes such as mean estimated blood loss (P = 0.807) and length of stay (P = 0.494) were similar. There was a difference in mean operative time (P < 0.001; attending only = 89.3 min, attending and fellow 125.4 min, and attending and chief resident 126.9 min). Functional outcomes at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively such as urinary continence rate (P = 0.977 and P = 0.720, respectively), and SHIM score (P = 0.661 and P = 0.890, respectively) were similar. The rate of positive surgical margins (P = 0.058) was similar. CONCLUSIONS: Training chief residents and fellows to perform RARP may be associated with increased operative times, but does not compromise short-term functional and oncological outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4494638 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Asian Pacific Prostate Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44946382015-07-08 Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes? Lee, Ziho Lightfoot, Andrew J. Mucksavage, Phillip Lee, David I. Prostate Int Original Article PURPOSE: To determine whether robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may be taught to chief residents and fellows without influencing operative outcomes. METHODS: Between August 2011 and June 2012, 388 patients underwent RARP by a single primary surgeon (DIL) at our institution. Our teaching algorithm divides RARP into five stages, and each trainee progresses through the stages in a sequential manner. Statistical analysis was conducted after grouping the cohort according to the surgeons operating the robotic console: attending only (n = 91), attending and fellow (n = 152), and attending and chief resident (n = 145). Approximately normal variables were compared utilizing one-way analysis of variance, and categorical variables were compared utilizing two-tailed χ(2) test; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There was no difference in mean age (P = 0.590), body mass index (P = 0.339), preoperative SHIM (Sexual Health Inventory for Men) score (P = 0.084), preoperative AUASS (American Urologic Association Symptom Score) (P = 0.086), preoperative prostate-specific antigen (P = 0.258), clinical and pathological stage (P = 0.766 and P = 0.699, respectively), and preoperative and postoperative Gleason score (P = 0.775 and P = 0.870, respectively). Operative outcomes such as mean estimated blood loss (P = 0.807) and length of stay (P = 0.494) were similar. There was a difference in mean operative time (P < 0.001; attending only = 89.3 min, attending and fellow 125.4 min, and attending and chief resident 126.9 min). Functional outcomes at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively such as urinary continence rate (P = 0.977 and P = 0.720, respectively), and SHIM score (P = 0.661 and P = 0.890, respectively) were similar. The rate of positive surgical margins (P = 0.058) was similar. CONCLUSIONS: Training chief residents and fellows to perform RARP may be associated with increased operative times, but does not compromise short-term functional and oncological outcomes. Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2015-06 2015-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4494638/ /pubmed/26157767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2015.03.005 Text en © 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Prostate International. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Ziho Lightfoot, Andrew J. Mucksavage, Phillip Lee, David I. Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes? |
title | Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes? |
title_full | Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes? |
title_fullStr | Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes? |
title_short | Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes? |
title_sort | can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2015.03.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeziho canrobotassistedradicalprostatectomybetaughttochiefresidentsandfellowswithoutaffectingoperativeoutcomes AT lightfootandrewj canrobotassistedradicalprostatectomybetaughttochiefresidentsandfellowswithoutaffectingoperativeoutcomes AT mucksavagephillip canrobotassistedradicalprostatectomybetaughttochiefresidentsandfellowswithoutaffectingoperativeoutcomes AT leedavidi canrobotassistedradicalprostatectomybetaughttochiefresidentsandfellowswithoutaffectingoperativeoutcomes |