Cargando…

The association of copy number variation and percent mammographic density

BACKGROUND: Percent mammographic density (PD) estimates the proportion of stromal, fat, and epithelial breast tissues on the mammogram image. Adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI), PD is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer [1]. Inherited factors are hypothesized to explain betwe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atkinson, Elizabeth J, Eckel-Passow, Jeanette E, Wang, Alice, Greenberg, Alexandra J, Scott, Christopher G, Pankratz, V Shane, Purrington, Kristen N, Sellers, Thomas A, Rider, David N, Heit, John A, de Andrade, Mariza, Cunningham, Julie M, Couch, Fergus J, Vachon, Celine M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26152678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1212-y
_version_ 1782380158258249728
author Atkinson, Elizabeth J
Eckel-Passow, Jeanette E
Wang, Alice
Greenberg, Alexandra J
Scott, Christopher G
Pankratz, V Shane
Purrington, Kristen N
Sellers, Thomas A
Rider, David N
Heit, John A
de Andrade, Mariza
Cunningham, Julie M
Couch, Fergus J
Vachon, Celine M
author_facet Atkinson, Elizabeth J
Eckel-Passow, Jeanette E
Wang, Alice
Greenberg, Alexandra J
Scott, Christopher G
Pankratz, V Shane
Purrington, Kristen N
Sellers, Thomas A
Rider, David N
Heit, John A
de Andrade, Mariza
Cunningham, Julie M
Couch, Fergus J
Vachon, Celine M
author_sort Atkinson, Elizabeth J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Percent mammographic density (PD) estimates the proportion of stromal, fat, and epithelial breast tissues on the mammogram image. Adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI), PD is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer [1]. Inherited factors are hypothesized to explain between 30 and 60% of the variance in this trait [2–5]. However, previously identified common genetic variants account for less than 6% of the variance in PD, leaving much of the genetic contribution to this trait unexplained. We performed the first study to examine whether germline copy number variation (CNV) are associated with PD. Two genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of percent density conducted on the Illumina 660W-Quad were used to identify and replicate the association between candidate CNVs and PD: the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study (MBCFS) and controls from the Mayo Venous Thromboembolism (Mayo VTE) Case–Control Study, with 585 and 328 women, respectively. Linear models were utilized to examine the association of each probe with PD, adjusted for age, menopausal status and BMI. Segmentation was subsequently performed on the probe-level test statistics to identify candidate CNV regions that were associated with PD. RESULTS: Sixty-one probes from five chromosomal regions [3q26.1 (2 regions), 8q24.22, 11p15.3, and 17q22] were significantly associated with PD in MBCFS (p-values <0.0001). A CNV at 3q26.1 showed the greatest evidence for association with PD; a region without any known SNPs. Conversely, the CNV at 17q22 was largely due to the association between SNPs and PD in the region. SNPs in the 8q24.22 region have been shown to be associated with risk of many cancers; however, SNPs in this region were not responsible for the observed CNV association. While we were unable to replicate the associations with PD, two of the five CNVs (3q26.1 and 11p15.3) were also observed in the Mayo VTE controls. CONCLUSIONS: CNVs may help to explain some of the variability in PD that is currently unexplained by SNPs. While we were able to replicate the existence of two CNVs across the two GWAS studies, we were unable to replicate the associations with PD. Even so, the proximity of the identified CNV regions to loci known to be associated with breast cancer risk suggests further investigation and potentially shared genetic mechanisms underlying the PD and breast cancer association. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1212-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4494822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44948222015-07-08 The association of copy number variation and percent mammographic density Atkinson, Elizabeth J Eckel-Passow, Jeanette E Wang, Alice Greenberg, Alexandra J Scott, Christopher G Pankratz, V Shane Purrington, Kristen N Sellers, Thomas A Rider, David N Heit, John A de Andrade, Mariza Cunningham, Julie M Couch, Fergus J Vachon, Celine M BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Percent mammographic density (PD) estimates the proportion of stromal, fat, and epithelial breast tissues on the mammogram image. Adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI), PD is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer [1]. Inherited factors are hypothesized to explain between 30 and 60% of the variance in this trait [2–5]. However, previously identified common genetic variants account for less than 6% of the variance in PD, leaving much of the genetic contribution to this trait unexplained. We performed the first study to examine whether germline copy number variation (CNV) are associated with PD. Two genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of percent density conducted on the Illumina 660W-Quad were used to identify and replicate the association between candidate CNVs and PD: the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study (MBCFS) and controls from the Mayo Venous Thromboembolism (Mayo VTE) Case–Control Study, with 585 and 328 women, respectively. Linear models were utilized to examine the association of each probe with PD, adjusted for age, menopausal status and BMI. Segmentation was subsequently performed on the probe-level test statistics to identify candidate CNV regions that were associated with PD. RESULTS: Sixty-one probes from five chromosomal regions [3q26.1 (2 regions), 8q24.22, 11p15.3, and 17q22] were significantly associated with PD in MBCFS (p-values <0.0001). A CNV at 3q26.1 showed the greatest evidence for association with PD; a region without any known SNPs. Conversely, the CNV at 17q22 was largely due to the association between SNPs and PD in the region. SNPs in the 8q24.22 region have been shown to be associated with risk of many cancers; however, SNPs in this region were not responsible for the observed CNV association. While we were unable to replicate the associations with PD, two of the five CNVs (3q26.1 and 11p15.3) were also observed in the Mayo VTE controls. CONCLUSIONS: CNVs may help to explain some of the variability in PD that is currently unexplained by SNPs. While we were able to replicate the existence of two CNVs across the two GWAS studies, we were unable to replicate the associations with PD. Even so, the proximity of the identified CNV regions to loci known to be associated with breast cancer risk suggests further investigation and potentially shared genetic mechanisms underlying the PD and breast cancer association. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1212-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4494822/ /pubmed/26152678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1212-y Text en © Atkinson et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Atkinson, Elizabeth J
Eckel-Passow, Jeanette E
Wang, Alice
Greenberg, Alexandra J
Scott, Christopher G
Pankratz, V Shane
Purrington, Kristen N
Sellers, Thomas A
Rider, David N
Heit, John A
de Andrade, Mariza
Cunningham, Julie M
Couch, Fergus J
Vachon, Celine M
The association of copy number variation and percent mammographic density
title The association of copy number variation and percent mammographic density
title_full The association of copy number variation and percent mammographic density
title_fullStr The association of copy number variation and percent mammographic density
title_full_unstemmed The association of copy number variation and percent mammographic density
title_short The association of copy number variation and percent mammographic density
title_sort association of copy number variation and percent mammographic density
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26152678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1212-y
work_keys_str_mv AT atkinsonelizabethj theassociationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT eckelpassowjeanettee theassociationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT wangalice theassociationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT greenbergalexandraj theassociationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT scottchristopherg theassociationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT pankratzvshane theassociationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT purringtonkristenn theassociationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT sellersthomasa theassociationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT riderdavidn theassociationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT heitjohna theassociationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT deandrademariza theassociationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT cunninghamjuliem theassociationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT couchfergusj theassociationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT vachoncelinem theassociationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT atkinsonelizabethj associationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT eckelpassowjeanettee associationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT wangalice associationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT greenbergalexandraj associationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT scottchristopherg associationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT pankratzvshane associationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT purringtonkristenn associationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT sellersthomasa associationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT riderdavidn associationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT heitjohna associationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT deandrademariza associationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT cunninghamjuliem associationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT couchfergusj associationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity
AT vachoncelinem associationofcopynumbervariationandpercentmammographicdensity