Cargando…

A Protocol-Based Decision for Choosing a Proper Surgical Treatment Option for Carotid Artery Stenosis

OBJECTIVE: There are two established surgical treatment options for carotid artery stenosis. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been accepted as a gold standard for surgical treatment while carotid artery stenting (CAS) has recently become an alternative option. Each treatment option has advantages an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jang, E-Wook, Chung, Joonho, Seo, Kwon-Duk, Suh, Sang Hyun, Kim, Yong Bae, Lee, Kyung-Yul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Cerebrovascular Surgeons; Society of Korean Endovascular Neurosurgeons 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4495083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157689
http://dx.doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2015.17.2.101
_version_ 1782380197161467904
author Jang, E-Wook
Chung, Joonho
Seo, Kwon-Duk
Suh, Sang Hyun
Kim, Yong Bae
Lee, Kyung-Yul
author_facet Jang, E-Wook
Chung, Joonho
Seo, Kwon-Duk
Suh, Sang Hyun
Kim, Yong Bae
Lee, Kyung-Yul
author_sort Jang, E-Wook
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There are two established surgical treatment options for carotid artery stenosis. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been accepted as a gold standard for surgical treatment while carotid artery stenting (CAS) has recently become an alternative option. Each treatment option has advantages and disadvantages for the treatment outcomes. We propose a protocol for selection of a proper surgical treatment option for carotid artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 192 published articles on management of carotid artery stenosis were reviewed. Preoperatively considerable factors which had been repeatedly noted in those articles for the risk/benefits of CEA or CAS were selected. According to those factors, a protocol with four categories was established. RESULTS: CEA or CAS is indicated when the patient has a symptomatic stenosis ≥ 50%, or when the patient has an asymptomatic stenosis ≥ 80%. Each treatment option has absolute indications and favorable indications. Each absolute indication is scored with three points, and each favorable indication, one point. Based on the highest scores, a proper treatment option (CEA or CAS) is selected. CONCLUSION: We have been treating patients according to this protocol and evaluating the outcomes of our protocol-based decision because this protocol might be helpful in assessment of risk/benefit for selection of a proper surgical treatment option in patients with carotid artery stenosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4495083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Korean Society of Cerebrovascular Surgeons; Society of Korean Endovascular Neurosurgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44950832015-07-08 A Protocol-Based Decision for Choosing a Proper Surgical Treatment Option for Carotid Artery Stenosis Jang, E-Wook Chung, Joonho Seo, Kwon-Duk Suh, Sang Hyun Kim, Yong Bae Lee, Kyung-Yul J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg Original Article OBJECTIVE: There are two established surgical treatment options for carotid artery stenosis. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been accepted as a gold standard for surgical treatment while carotid artery stenting (CAS) has recently become an alternative option. Each treatment option has advantages and disadvantages for the treatment outcomes. We propose a protocol for selection of a proper surgical treatment option for carotid artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 192 published articles on management of carotid artery stenosis were reviewed. Preoperatively considerable factors which had been repeatedly noted in those articles for the risk/benefits of CEA or CAS were selected. According to those factors, a protocol with four categories was established. RESULTS: CEA or CAS is indicated when the patient has a symptomatic stenosis ≥ 50%, or when the patient has an asymptomatic stenosis ≥ 80%. Each treatment option has absolute indications and favorable indications. Each absolute indication is scored with three points, and each favorable indication, one point. Based on the highest scores, a proper treatment option (CEA or CAS) is selected. CONCLUSION: We have been treating patients according to this protocol and evaluating the outcomes of our protocol-based decision because this protocol might be helpful in assessment of risk/benefit for selection of a proper surgical treatment option in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Korean Society of Cerebrovascular Surgeons; Society of Korean Endovascular Neurosurgeons 2015-06 2015-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4495083/ /pubmed/26157689 http://dx.doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2015.17.2.101 Text en © 2015 Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jang, E-Wook
Chung, Joonho
Seo, Kwon-Duk
Suh, Sang Hyun
Kim, Yong Bae
Lee, Kyung-Yul
A Protocol-Based Decision for Choosing a Proper Surgical Treatment Option for Carotid Artery Stenosis
title A Protocol-Based Decision for Choosing a Proper Surgical Treatment Option for Carotid Artery Stenosis
title_full A Protocol-Based Decision for Choosing a Proper Surgical Treatment Option for Carotid Artery Stenosis
title_fullStr A Protocol-Based Decision for Choosing a Proper Surgical Treatment Option for Carotid Artery Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed A Protocol-Based Decision for Choosing a Proper Surgical Treatment Option for Carotid Artery Stenosis
title_short A Protocol-Based Decision for Choosing a Proper Surgical Treatment Option for Carotid Artery Stenosis
title_sort protocol-based decision for choosing a proper surgical treatment option for carotid artery stenosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4495083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157689
http://dx.doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2015.17.2.101
work_keys_str_mv AT jangewook aprotocolbaseddecisionforchoosingapropersurgicaltreatmentoptionforcarotidarterystenosis
AT chungjoonho aprotocolbaseddecisionforchoosingapropersurgicaltreatmentoptionforcarotidarterystenosis
AT seokwonduk aprotocolbaseddecisionforchoosingapropersurgicaltreatmentoptionforcarotidarterystenosis
AT suhsanghyun aprotocolbaseddecisionforchoosingapropersurgicaltreatmentoptionforcarotidarterystenosis
AT kimyongbae aprotocolbaseddecisionforchoosingapropersurgicaltreatmentoptionforcarotidarterystenosis
AT leekyungyul aprotocolbaseddecisionforchoosingapropersurgicaltreatmentoptionforcarotidarterystenosis
AT jangewook protocolbaseddecisionforchoosingapropersurgicaltreatmentoptionforcarotidarterystenosis
AT chungjoonho protocolbaseddecisionforchoosingapropersurgicaltreatmentoptionforcarotidarterystenosis
AT seokwonduk protocolbaseddecisionforchoosingapropersurgicaltreatmentoptionforcarotidarterystenosis
AT suhsanghyun protocolbaseddecisionforchoosingapropersurgicaltreatmentoptionforcarotidarterystenosis
AT kimyongbae protocolbaseddecisionforchoosingapropersurgicaltreatmentoptionforcarotidarterystenosis
AT leekyungyul protocolbaseddecisionforchoosingapropersurgicaltreatmentoptionforcarotidarterystenosis