Cargando…
A structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in Afghanistan during the current conflict
BACKGROUND: Afghanistan has struggled with several decades of well-documented conflict, increasing the importance of providing emergency services to its citizens. However, little is known about the country’s capacity to provide such care. METHODS: Three native-speaking Afghan-American physicians per...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4495094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26180556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-015-0069-0 |
_version_ | 1782380199397031936 |
---|---|
author | Rashid, Leeda Afzali, Edris Donaldson, Ross Lazar, Paul Bundesmann, Raghnild Rashid, Samra |
author_facet | Rashid, Leeda Afzali, Edris Donaldson, Ross Lazar, Paul Bundesmann, Raghnild Rashid, Samra |
author_sort | Rashid, Leeda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Afghanistan has struggled with several decades of well-documented conflict, increasing the importance of providing emergency services to its citizens. However, little is known about the country’s capacity to provide such care. METHODS: Three native-speaking Afghan-American physicians performed an assessment of emergency care via combined quantitative and qualitative survey tools. Hospitals in Kabul, Afghanistan were selected based on probability proportional to size methodology, in which size was derived from prior work in the country and permission granted by the administering agency and the Ministry of Health. A written survey was given to physicians and nurses, followed by structured focus groups, and multiple days of observation per facility. A descriptive analysis was performed and data analyzed through a combination of variables in eight overarching categories relevant to emergency care. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five surveys were completed from 9 hospitals. One third of respondents (32.8 %) worked full time in the emergency departments, with another 28.8 % working there at least three quarters of the time. Over 63 % of providers believed that the greatest delay for care in emergencies was in the prehospital setting. Differences were noted among the various types of facilities when looking at specific components of emergency care such as skill level of workers, frequencies of assaults in the hospitals, and other domains of service provision. Sum of squares between the different facility types were highest for areas of skill (SS = 210.3; p = .001), confidence in the system (SS = 156.5; p < .005), assault (SS = 487.6; p < .005), and feeling safe in the emergency departments (SS = 193.1, p < .005). Confidence negatively correlated to frequency of assaults (Pearson r = −.33; p < .005) but positively correlated with feeling safe (Pearson r = .51; p < .005) and reliability of equipment (Pearson r = .48; p < .005). The only correlation for access to services was prehospital care (Pearson r = .72, p < .005). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant need to provide emergency care services in Afghanistan, specifically prehospital care. High variability exists among facility-type in various components of emergency services provision. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12245-015-0069-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4495094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44950942015-07-15 A structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in Afghanistan during the current conflict Rashid, Leeda Afzali, Edris Donaldson, Ross Lazar, Paul Bundesmann, Raghnild Rashid, Samra Int J Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Afghanistan has struggled with several decades of well-documented conflict, increasing the importance of providing emergency services to its citizens. However, little is known about the country’s capacity to provide such care. METHODS: Three native-speaking Afghan-American physicians performed an assessment of emergency care via combined quantitative and qualitative survey tools. Hospitals in Kabul, Afghanistan were selected based on probability proportional to size methodology, in which size was derived from prior work in the country and permission granted by the administering agency and the Ministry of Health. A written survey was given to physicians and nurses, followed by structured focus groups, and multiple days of observation per facility. A descriptive analysis was performed and data analyzed through a combination of variables in eight overarching categories relevant to emergency care. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five surveys were completed from 9 hospitals. One third of respondents (32.8 %) worked full time in the emergency departments, with another 28.8 % working there at least three quarters of the time. Over 63 % of providers believed that the greatest delay for care in emergencies was in the prehospital setting. Differences were noted among the various types of facilities when looking at specific components of emergency care such as skill level of workers, frequencies of assaults in the hospitals, and other domains of service provision. Sum of squares between the different facility types were highest for areas of skill (SS = 210.3; p = .001), confidence in the system (SS = 156.5; p < .005), assault (SS = 487.6; p < .005), and feeling safe in the emergency departments (SS = 193.1, p < .005). Confidence negatively correlated to frequency of assaults (Pearson r = −.33; p < .005) but positively correlated with feeling safe (Pearson r = .51; p < .005) and reliability of equipment (Pearson r = .48; p < .005). The only correlation for access to services was prehospital care (Pearson r = .72, p < .005). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant need to provide emergency care services in Afghanistan, specifically prehospital care. High variability exists among facility-type in various components of emergency services provision. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12245-015-0069-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4495094/ /pubmed/26180556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-015-0069-0 Text en © Rashid et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Rashid, Leeda Afzali, Edris Donaldson, Ross Lazar, Paul Bundesmann, Raghnild Rashid, Samra A structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in Afghanistan during the current conflict |
title | A structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in Afghanistan during the current conflict |
title_full | A structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in Afghanistan during the current conflict |
title_fullStr | A structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in Afghanistan during the current conflict |
title_full_unstemmed | A structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in Afghanistan during the current conflict |
title_short | A structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in Afghanistan during the current conflict |
title_sort | structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in afghanistan during the current conflict |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4495094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26180556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-015-0069-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rashidleeda astructuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict AT afzaliedris astructuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict AT donaldsonross astructuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict AT lazarpaul astructuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict AT bundesmannraghnild astructuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict AT rashidsamra astructuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict AT rashidleeda structuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict AT afzaliedris structuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict AT donaldsonross structuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict AT lazarpaul structuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict AT bundesmannraghnild structuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict AT rashidsamra structuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict |