Cargando…

A structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in Afghanistan during the current conflict

BACKGROUND: Afghanistan has struggled with several decades of well-documented conflict, increasing the importance of providing emergency services to its citizens. However, little is known about the country’s capacity to provide such care. METHODS: Three native-speaking Afghan-American physicians per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rashid, Leeda, Afzali, Edris, Donaldson, Ross, Lazar, Paul, Bundesmann, Raghnild, Rashid, Samra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4495094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26180556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-015-0069-0
_version_ 1782380199397031936
author Rashid, Leeda
Afzali, Edris
Donaldson, Ross
Lazar, Paul
Bundesmann, Raghnild
Rashid, Samra
author_facet Rashid, Leeda
Afzali, Edris
Donaldson, Ross
Lazar, Paul
Bundesmann, Raghnild
Rashid, Samra
author_sort Rashid, Leeda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Afghanistan has struggled with several decades of well-documented conflict, increasing the importance of providing emergency services to its citizens. However, little is known about the country’s capacity to provide such care. METHODS: Three native-speaking Afghan-American physicians performed an assessment of emergency care via combined quantitative and qualitative survey tools. Hospitals in Kabul, Afghanistan were selected based on probability proportional to size methodology, in which size was derived from prior work in the country and permission granted by the administering agency and the Ministry of Health. A written survey was given to physicians and nurses, followed by structured focus groups, and multiple days of observation per facility. A descriptive analysis was performed and data analyzed through a combination of variables in eight overarching categories relevant to emergency care. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five surveys were completed from 9 hospitals. One third of respondents (32.8 %) worked full time in the emergency departments, with another 28.8 % working there at least three quarters of the time. Over 63 % of providers believed that the greatest delay for care in emergencies was in the prehospital setting. Differences were noted among the various types of facilities when looking at specific components of emergency care such as skill level of workers, frequencies of assaults in the hospitals, and other domains of service provision. Sum of squares between the different facility types were highest for areas of skill (SS = 210.3; p = .001), confidence in the system (SS = 156.5; p < .005), assault (SS = 487.6; p < .005), and feeling safe in the emergency departments (SS = 193.1, p < .005). Confidence negatively correlated to frequency of assaults (Pearson r = −.33; p < .005) but positively correlated with feeling safe (Pearson r = .51; p < .005) and reliability of equipment (Pearson r = .48; p < .005). The only correlation for access to services was prehospital care (Pearson r = .72, p < .005). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant need to provide emergency care services in Afghanistan, specifically prehospital care. High variability exists among facility-type in various components of emergency services provision. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12245-015-0069-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4495094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44950942015-07-15 A structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in Afghanistan during the current conflict Rashid, Leeda Afzali, Edris Donaldson, Ross Lazar, Paul Bundesmann, Raghnild Rashid, Samra Int J Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Afghanistan has struggled with several decades of well-documented conflict, increasing the importance of providing emergency services to its citizens. However, little is known about the country’s capacity to provide such care. METHODS: Three native-speaking Afghan-American physicians performed an assessment of emergency care via combined quantitative and qualitative survey tools. Hospitals in Kabul, Afghanistan were selected based on probability proportional to size methodology, in which size was derived from prior work in the country and permission granted by the administering agency and the Ministry of Health. A written survey was given to physicians and nurses, followed by structured focus groups, and multiple days of observation per facility. A descriptive analysis was performed and data analyzed through a combination of variables in eight overarching categories relevant to emergency care. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five surveys were completed from 9 hospitals. One third of respondents (32.8 %) worked full time in the emergency departments, with another 28.8 % working there at least three quarters of the time. Over 63 % of providers believed that the greatest delay for care in emergencies was in the prehospital setting. Differences were noted among the various types of facilities when looking at specific components of emergency care such as skill level of workers, frequencies of assaults in the hospitals, and other domains of service provision. Sum of squares between the different facility types were highest for areas of skill (SS = 210.3; p = .001), confidence in the system (SS = 156.5; p < .005), assault (SS = 487.6; p < .005), and feeling safe in the emergency departments (SS = 193.1, p < .005). Confidence negatively correlated to frequency of assaults (Pearson r = −.33; p < .005) but positively correlated with feeling safe (Pearson r = .51; p < .005) and reliability of equipment (Pearson r = .48; p < .005). The only correlation for access to services was prehospital care (Pearson r = .72, p < .005). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant need to provide emergency care services in Afghanistan, specifically prehospital care. High variability exists among facility-type in various components of emergency services provision. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12245-015-0069-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4495094/ /pubmed/26180556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-015-0069-0 Text en © Rashid et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Rashid, Leeda
Afzali, Edris
Donaldson, Ross
Lazar, Paul
Bundesmann, Raghnild
Rashid, Samra
A structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in Afghanistan during the current conflict
title A structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in Afghanistan during the current conflict
title_full A structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in Afghanistan during the current conflict
title_fullStr A structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in Afghanistan during the current conflict
title_full_unstemmed A structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in Afghanistan during the current conflict
title_short A structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in Afghanistan during the current conflict
title_sort structured assessment of emergency and acute care providers in afghanistan during the current conflict
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4495094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26180556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-015-0069-0
work_keys_str_mv AT rashidleeda astructuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict
AT afzaliedris astructuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict
AT donaldsonross astructuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict
AT lazarpaul astructuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict
AT bundesmannraghnild astructuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict
AT rashidsamra astructuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict
AT rashidleeda structuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict
AT afzaliedris structuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict
AT donaldsonross structuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict
AT lazarpaul structuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict
AT bundesmannraghnild structuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict
AT rashidsamra structuredassessmentofemergencyandacutecareprovidersinafghanistanduringthecurrentconflict