Cargando…

A multifaceted feedback strategy alone does not improve the adherence to organizational guideline-based standards: a cluster randomized trial in intensive care

BACKGROUND: Organizational data such as bed occupancy rate and nurse-to-patient ratio are related to clinical outcomes and to the efficient use of intensive care unit (ICU) resources. Standards for these performance indicators are provided in guidelines. We studied the effects of a multifaceted feed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Vos, Maartje L. G., van der Veer, Sabine N., Wouterse, Bram, Graafmans, Wilco C., Peek, Niels, de Keizer, Nicolette F., Jager, Kitty J., Westert, Gert P., van der Voort, Peter H. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4495635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26152568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0285-2
_version_ 1782380284591734784
author de Vos, Maartje L. G.
van der Veer, Sabine N.
Wouterse, Bram
Graafmans, Wilco C.
Peek, Niels
de Keizer, Nicolette F.
Jager, Kitty J.
Westert, Gert P.
van der Voort, Peter H. J.
author_facet de Vos, Maartje L. G.
van der Veer, Sabine N.
Wouterse, Bram
Graafmans, Wilco C.
Peek, Niels
de Keizer, Nicolette F.
Jager, Kitty J.
Westert, Gert P.
van der Voort, Peter H. J.
author_sort de Vos, Maartje L. G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Organizational data such as bed occupancy rate and nurse-to-patient ratio are related to clinical outcomes and to the efficient use of intensive care unit (ICU) resources. Standards for these performance indicators are provided in guidelines. We studied the effects of a multifaceted feedback strategy to improve the adherence to these standards. METHODS: In a cluster randomized controlled study design the intervention ICUs received extensive monthly feedback reports, they received outreach visits and initiated a quality improvement team. The control ICUs received limited quarterly feedback reports only. We collected primary data prospectively within the setting of a Dutch national ICU registry over a 14-month study period. The target indicators were bed occupancy rate (aiming at 80 % or below) and nurse-to-patient ratio (aiming at 0.5 or higher). Data were collected per 8-h nursing shift. Logistic regression analysis was performed. For both study end points, the odds ratios (OR) for improvements at follow-up versus at baseline were calculated separately for control and intervention ICUs. RESULTS: We analyzed data on 67,237 nursing shifts. The bed occupancy rate did not improve in the intervention group compared to baseline (adjusted OR 0.88; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.62–1.27) or compared to control group (OR 0.67; 95 % CI 0.39–1.15). The nurse-to-patient ratio did not improve (OR 0.72; 95 % CI 0.41–1.26 compared to baseline and OR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.35–1.19 compared to control group). CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted feedback intervention did not improve the adherence to guideline-based standards on the organizational issues bed occupancy rate and nurse-to-patient ratio in the ICU. The reasons may be a limited confidence in data quality, the lack of practical tools for improvement, and the relatively short follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: ISRCTN50542146
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4495635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44956352015-07-09 A multifaceted feedback strategy alone does not improve the adherence to organizational guideline-based standards: a cluster randomized trial in intensive care de Vos, Maartje L. G. van der Veer, Sabine N. Wouterse, Bram Graafmans, Wilco C. Peek, Niels de Keizer, Nicolette F. Jager, Kitty J. Westert, Gert P. van der Voort, Peter H. J. Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Organizational data such as bed occupancy rate and nurse-to-patient ratio are related to clinical outcomes and to the efficient use of intensive care unit (ICU) resources. Standards for these performance indicators are provided in guidelines. We studied the effects of a multifaceted feedback strategy to improve the adherence to these standards. METHODS: In a cluster randomized controlled study design the intervention ICUs received extensive monthly feedback reports, they received outreach visits and initiated a quality improvement team. The control ICUs received limited quarterly feedback reports only. We collected primary data prospectively within the setting of a Dutch national ICU registry over a 14-month study period. The target indicators were bed occupancy rate (aiming at 80 % or below) and nurse-to-patient ratio (aiming at 0.5 or higher). Data were collected per 8-h nursing shift. Logistic regression analysis was performed. For both study end points, the odds ratios (OR) for improvements at follow-up versus at baseline were calculated separately for control and intervention ICUs. RESULTS: We analyzed data on 67,237 nursing shifts. The bed occupancy rate did not improve in the intervention group compared to baseline (adjusted OR 0.88; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.62–1.27) or compared to control group (OR 0.67; 95 % CI 0.39–1.15). The nurse-to-patient ratio did not improve (OR 0.72; 95 % CI 0.41–1.26 compared to baseline and OR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.35–1.19 compared to control group). CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted feedback intervention did not improve the adherence to guideline-based standards on the organizational issues bed occupancy rate and nurse-to-patient ratio in the ICU. The reasons may be a limited confidence in data quality, the lack of practical tools for improvement, and the relatively short follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: ISRCTN50542146 BioMed Central 2015-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4495635/ /pubmed/26152568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0285-2 Text en © de Vos et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
de Vos, Maartje L. G.
van der Veer, Sabine N.
Wouterse, Bram
Graafmans, Wilco C.
Peek, Niels
de Keizer, Nicolette F.
Jager, Kitty J.
Westert, Gert P.
van der Voort, Peter H. J.
A multifaceted feedback strategy alone does not improve the adherence to organizational guideline-based standards: a cluster randomized trial in intensive care
title A multifaceted feedback strategy alone does not improve the adherence to organizational guideline-based standards: a cluster randomized trial in intensive care
title_full A multifaceted feedback strategy alone does not improve the adherence to organizational guideline-based standards: a cluster randomized trial in intensive care
title_fullStr A multifaceted feedback strategy alone does not improve the adherence to organizational guideline-based standards: a cluster randomized trial in intensive care
title_full_unstemmed A multifaceted feedback strategy alone does not improve the adherence to organizational guideline-based standards: a cluster randomized trial in intensive care
title_short A multifaceted feedback strategy alone does not improve the adherence to organizational guideline-based standards: a cluster randomized trial in intensive care
title_sort multifaceted feedback strategy alone does not improve the adherence to organizational guideline-based standards: a cluster randomized trial in intensive care
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4495635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26152568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0285-2
work_keys_str_mv AT devosmaartjelg amultifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT vanderveersabinen amultifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT woutersebram amultifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT graafmanswilcoc amultifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT peekniels amultifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT dekeizernicolettef amultifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT jagerkittyj amultifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT westertgertp amultifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT vandervoortpeterhj amultifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT devosmaartjelg multifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT vanderveersabinen multifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT woutersebram multifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT graafmanswilcoc multifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT peekniels multifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT dekeizernicolettef multifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT jagerkittyj multifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT westertgertp multifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare
AT vandervoortpeterhj multifacetedfeedbackstrategyalonedoesnotimprovetheadherencetoorganizationalguidelinebasedstandardsaclusterrandomizedtrialinintensivecare