Cargando…

The use of dried blood spot sampling for the measurement of HbA1c: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: The use of dried blood spot (DBS) sampling is an alternative to traditional venous blood collection, and particularly useful for people living in rural and remote areas, and for those who are infirm, house-bound or time-poor. The objective of this study was to assess whether the measurem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mastronardi, Claudio A., Whittle, Belinda, Tunningley, Robert, Neeman, Teresa, Paz-Filho, Gilberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4495815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12907-015-0013-5
_version_ 1782380308678574080
author Mastronardi, Claudio A.
Whittle, Belinda
Tunningley, Robert
Neeman, Teresa
Paz-Filho, Gilberto
author_facet Mastronardi, Claudio A.
Whittle, Belinda
Tunningley, Robert
Neeman, Teresa
Paz-Filho, Gilberto
author_sort Mastronardi, Claudio A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of dried blood spot (DBS) sampling is an alternative to traditional venous blood collection, and particularly useful for people living in rural and remote areas, and for those who are infirm, house-bound or time-poor. The objective of this study was to assess whether the measurement of glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in DBS samples provided comparative and acceptably precise results. METHODS: Venous and capillary blood samples were collected from 115 adult participants. After proper instruction, each participant punctured his/her own finger and collected capillary blood samples on pieces of a proprietary cellulose filter paper. Each filter paper was subsequently placed inside a breathable envelope, stored at room temperature, and processed on the same day (D0), four (D4), seven (D7) and fourteen (D14) days after collection. HbA1c was measured in duplicates/triplicates in whole venous blood (WB), capillary blood (capDBS) and venous blood placed on the matrix paper (venDBS), by turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay. Intra-assay coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated. DBS values were compared to WB results using linear regression, Bland-Altman plots and cross-validation models. RESULTS: Eleven and 56 patients had type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, respectively. Mean HbA1c levels were 6.22 ± 1.11 % for WB samples (n = 115). The median intra-assay CV was lower than 3 % for WB and capDBS on all days. Results from capDBS and venDBS showed high correlation and agreement to WB results, with narrow 95 % limits of agreement (except for results from D14 samples), as observed in Bland-Altman plots. When capDBS values were applied to equations derived from regression analyses, results approached those of WB values. A cross-validation model showed that capDBS results on D0, D4 and D7 were close to the WB results, with prediction intervals that were narrow enough to be clinically acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of HbA1c from DBS samples provided results that were comparable to results from WB samples, if measured up to seven days after collection. Intra-assay coefficients of variation were low, results were in agreement with the gold-standard, and prediction intervals were clinically acceptable. The measurement of HbA1c through DBS sampling may be considered in situations where traditional venipuncture is not available. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ID ACTRN12613000769785.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4495815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44958152015-07-09 The use of dried blood spot sampling for the measurement of HbA1c: a cross-sectional study Mastronardi, Claudio A. Whittle, Belinda Tunningley, Robert Neeman, Teresa Paz-Filho, Gilberto BMC Clin Pathol Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of dried blood spot (DBS) sampling is an alternative to traditional venous blood collection, and particularly useful for people living in rural and remote areas, and for those who are infirm, house-bound or time-poor. The objective of this study was to assess whether the measurement of glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in DBS samples provided comparative and acceptably precise results. METHODS: Venous and capillary blood samples were collected from 115 adult participants. After proper instruction, each participant punctured his/her own finger and collected capillary blood samples on pieces of a proprietary cellulose filter paper. Each filter paper was subsequently placed inside a breathable envelope, stored at room temperature, and processed on the same day (D0), four (D4), seven (D7) and fourteen (D14) days after collection. HbA1c was measured in duplicates/triplicates in whole venous blood (WB), capillary blood (capDBS) and venous blood placed on the matrix paper (venDBS), by turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay. Intra-assay coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated. DBS values were compared to WB results using linear regression, Bland-Altman plots and cross-validation models. RESULTS: Eleven and 56 patients had type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, respectively. Mean HbA1c levels were 6.22 ± 1.11 % for WB samples (n = 115). The median intra-assay CV was lower than 3 % for WB and capDBS on all days. Results from capDBS and venDBS showed high correlation and agreement to WB results, with narrow 95 % limits of agreement (except for results from D14 samples), as observed in Bland-Altman plots. When capDBS values were applied to equations derived from regression analyses, results approached those of WB values. A cross-validation model showed that capDBS results on D0, D4 and D7 were close to the WB results, with prediction intervals that were narrow enough to be clinically acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of HbA1c from DBS samples provided results that were comparable to results from WB samples, if measured up to seven days after collection. Intra-assay coefficients of variation were low, results were in agreement with the gold-standard, and prediction intervals were clinically acceptable. The measurement of HbA1c through DBS sampling may be considered in situations where traditional venipuncture is not available. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ID ACTRN12613000769785. BioMed Central 2015-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4495815/ /pubmed/26157353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12907-015-0013-5 Text en © Mastronardi et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mastronardi, Claudio A.
Whittle, Belinda
Tunningley, Robert
Neeman, Teresa
Paz-Filho, Gilberto
The use of dried blood spot sampling for the measurement of HbA1c: a cross-sectional study
title The use of dried blood spot sampling for the measurement of HbA1c: a cross-sectional study
title_full The use of dried blood spot sampling for the measurement of HbA1c: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr The use of dried blood spot sampling for the measurement of HbA1c: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed The use of dried blood spot sampling for the measurement of HbA1c: a cross-sectional study
title_short The use of dried blood spot sampling for the measurement of HbA1c: a cross-sectional study
title_sort use of dried blood spot sampling for the measurement of hba1c: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4495815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12907-015-0013-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mastronardiclaudioa theuseofdriedbloodspotsamplingforthemeasurementofhba1cacrosssectionalstudy
AT whittlebelinda theuseofdriedbloodspotsamplingforthemeasurementofhba1cacrosssectionalstudy
AT tunningleyrobert theuseofdriedbloodspotsamplingforthemeasurementofhba1cacrosssectionalstudy
AT neemanteresa theuseofdriedbloodspotsamplingforthemeasurementofhba1cacrosssectionalstudy
AT pazfilhogilberto theuseofdriedbloodspotsamplingforthemeasurementofhba1cacrosssectionalstudy
AT mastronardiclaudioa useofdriedbloodspotsamplingforthemeasurementofhba1cacrosssectionalstudy
AT whittlebelinda useofdriedbloodspotsamplingforthemeasurementofhba1cacrosssectionalstudy
AT tunningleyrobert useofdriedbloodspotsamplingforthemeasurementofhba1cacrosssectionalstudy
AT neemanteresa useofdriedbloodspotsamplingforthemeasurementofhba1cacrosssectionalstudy
AT pazfilhogilberto useofdriedbloodspotsamplingforthemeasurementofhba1cacrosssectionalstudy