Cargando…

Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents: Final 5-Year Report of the RESOLUTE All-Comers Trial

BACKGROUND—: Newer-generation drug-eluting stents that release zotarolimus or everolimus have been shown to be superior to the first-generation drug-eluting stents. However, data comparing long-term safety and efficacy of zotarolimus- (ZES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) are limited. RESOLUTE a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iqbal, Javaid, Serruys, Patrick W., Silber, Sigmund, Kelbaek, Henning, Richardt, Gert, Morel, Marie-Angele, Negoita, Manuela, Buszman, Pawel E., Windecker, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4495878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26047993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002230
_version_ 1782380318213275648
author Iqbal, Javaid
Serruys, Patrick W.
Silber, Sigmund
Kelbaek, Henning
Richardt, Gert
Morel, Marie-Angele
Negoita, Manuela
Buszman, Pawel E.
Windecker, Stephan
author_facet Iqbal, Javaid
Serruys, Patrick W.
Silber, Sigmund
Kelbaek, Henning
Richardt, Gert
Morel, Marie-Angele
Negoita, Manuela
Buszman, Pawel E.
Windecker, Stephan
author_sort Iqbal, Javaid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND—: Newer-generation drug-eluting stents that release zotarolimus or everolimus have been shown to be superior to the first-generation drug-eluting stents. However, data comparing long-term safety and efficacy of zotarolimus- (ZES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) are limited. RESOLUTE all-comers (Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial compared these 2 stents and has shown that ZES was noninferior to EES at 12-month for the primary end point of target lesion failure. We report the secondary clinical outcomes at the final 5-year follow-up of this trial. METHODS AND RESULTS—: RESOLUTE all-comer clinical study is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, 2-arm, open-label, noninferiority trial with minimal exclusion criteria. Patients (n=2292) were randomly assigned to treatment with either ZES (n=1140) or EES (n=1152). Patient-oriented composite end point (combination of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and any revascularizations), device-oriented composite end point (combination of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization), and major adverse cardiac events (combination of all-cause death, all myocardial infarction, emergent coronary bypass surgery, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization) were analyzed at 5-year follow-up. The 2 groups were well-matched at baseline. Five-year follow-up data were available for 98% patients. There were no differences in patient-oriented composite end point (ZES 35.3% versus EES 32.0%, P=0.11), device-oriented composite end point (ZES 17.0% versus EES 16.2%, P=0.61), major adverse cardiac events (ZES 21.9% versus EES 21.6%, P=0.88), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ZES 2.8% versus EES 1.8%, P=0.12). CONCLUSIONS—: At 5-year follow-up, ZES and EES had similar efficacy and safety in a population of patients who had minimal exclusion criteria. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00617084.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4495878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44958782015-07-17 Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents: Final 5-Year Report of the RESOLUTE All-Comers Trial Iqbal, Javaid Serruys, Patrick W. Silber, Sigmund Kelbaek, Henning Richardt, Gert Morel, Marie-Angele Negoita, Manuela Buszman, Pawel E. Windecker, Stephan Circ Cardiovasc Interv Original Articles BACKGROUND—: Newer-generation drug-eluting stents that release zotarolimus or everolimus have been shown to be superior to the first-generation drug-eluting stents. However, data comparing long-term safety and efficacy of zotarolimus- (ZES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) are limited. RESOLUTE all-comers (Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial compared these 2 stents and has shown that ZES was noninferior to EES at 12-month for the primary end point of target lesion failure. We report the secondary clinical outcomes at the final 5-year follow-up of this trial. METHODS AND RESULTS—: RESOLUTE all-comer clinical study is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, 2-arm, open-label, noninferiority trial with minimal exclusion criteria. Patients (n=2292) were randomly assigned to treatment with either ZES (n=1140) or EES (n=1152). Patient-oriented composite end point (combination of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and any revascularizations), device-oriented composite end point (combination of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization), and major adverse cardiac events (combination of all-cause death, all myocardial infarction, emergent coronary bypass surgery, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization) were analyzed at 5-year follow-up. The 2 groups were well-matched at baseline. Five-year follow-up data were available for 98% patients. There were no differences in patient-oriented composite end point (ZES 35.3% versus EES 32.0%, P=0.11), device-oriented composite end point (ZES 17.0% versus EES 16.2%, P=0.61), major adverse cardiac events (ZES 21.9% versus EES 21.6%, P=0.88), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ZES 2.8% versus EES 1.8%, P=0.12). CONCLUSIONS—: At 5-year follow-up, ZES and EES had similar efficacy and safety in a population of patients who had minimal exclusion criteria. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00617084. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-06 2015-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4495878/ /pubmed/26047993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002230 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDervis (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Iqbal, Javaid
Serruys, Patrick W.
Silber, Sigmund
Kelbaek, Henning
Richardt, Gert
Morel, Marie-Angele
Negoita, Manuela
Buszman, Pawel E.
Windecker, Stephan
Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents: Final 5-Year Report of the RESOLUTE All-Comers Trial
title Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents: Final 5-Year Report of the RESOLUTE All-Comers Trial
title_full Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents: Final 5-Year Report of the RESOLUTE All-Comers Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents: Final 5-Year Report of the RESOLUTE All-Comers Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents: Final 5-Year Report of the RESOLUTE All-Comers Trial
title_short Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents: Final 5-Year Report of the RESOLUTE All-Comers Trial
title_sort comparison of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting coronary stents: final 5-year report of the resolute all-comers trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4495878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26047993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002230
work_keys_str_mv AT iqbaljavaid comparisonofzotarolimusandeverolimuselutingcoronarystentsfinal5yearreportoftheresoluteallcomerstrial
AT serruyspatrickw comparisonofzotarolimusandeverolimuselutingcoronarystentsfinal5yearreportoftheresoluteallcomerstrial
AT silbersigmund comparisonofzotarolimusandeverolimuselutingcoronarystentsfinal5yearreportoftheresoluteallcomerstrial
AT kelbaekhenning comparisonofzotarolimusandeverolimuselutingcoronarystentsfinal5yearreportoftheresoluteallcomerstrial
AT richardtgert comparisonofzotarolimusandeverolimuselutingcoronarystentsfinal5yearreportoftheresoluteallcomerstrial
AT morelmarieangele comparisonofzotarolimusandeverolimuselutingcoronarystentsfinal5yearreportoftheresoluteallcomerstrial
AT negoitamanuela comparisonofzotarolimusandeverolimuselutingcoronarystentsfinal5yearreportoftheresoluteallcomerstrial
AT buszmanpawele comparisonofzotarolimusandeverolimuselutingcoronarystentsfinal5yearreportoftheresoluteallcomerstrial
AT windeckerstephan comparisonofzotarolimusandeverolimuselutingcoronarystentsfinal5yearreportoftheresoluteallcomerstrial