Cargando…
The Golden Section as Optical Limitation
The golden section, ϕ = (1 + √5)/2 = 1.618… and its companion ϕ = 1/ϕ = ϕ -1 = 0.618…, are irrational numbers which for centuries were believed to confer aesthetic appeal. In line with the presence of golden sectioning in natural growth patterns, recent EEG recordings show an absence of coherence be...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4495923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26154761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131045 |
_version_ | 1782380319208374272 |
---|---|
author | Elliott, Mark A. Kelly, Joy Friedel, Jonas Brodsky, Jennifer Mulcahy, Paul |
author_facet | Elliott, Mark A. Kelly, Joy Friedel, Jonas Brodsky, Jennifer Mulcahy, Paul |
author_sort | Elliott, Mark A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The golden section, ϕ = (1 + √5)/2 = 1.618… and its companion ϕ = 1/ϕ = ϕ -1 = 0.618…, are irrational numbers which for centuries were believed to confer aesthetic appeal. In line with the presence of golden sectioning in natural growth patterns, recent EEG recordings show an absence of coherence between brain frequencies related by the golden ratio, suggesting the potential relevance of the golden section to brain dynamics. Using Mondrian-type patterns comprising a number of paired sections in a range of five section-section areal ratios (including golden-sectioned pairs), participants were asked to indicate as rapidly and accurately as possible the polarity (light or dark) of the smallest section in the patterns. They were also asked to independently assess the aesthetic appeal of the patterns. No preference was found for golden-sectioned patterns, while reaction times (RTs) tended to decrease overall with increasing ratio independently of each pattern’s fractal dimensionality. (Fractal dimensionality was unrelated to ratio and measured in terms of the Minkowski-Bouligand box-counting dimension). The ease of detecting the smallest section also decreased with increasing ratio, although RTs were found to be substantially slower for golden-sectioned patterns under 8-paired sectioned conditions. This was confirmed by a significant linear relationship between RT and ratio (p <.001) only when the golden-sectioned RTs were excluded [the relationship was non-significant for the full complement of ratios (p = .217)]. Image analysis revealed an absence of spatial frequencies between 4 and 8 cycles-per-degree that was exclusive to the 8-paired (golden)-sectioned patterns. The significance of this was demonstrated in a subsequent experiment by addition of uniformly distributed random noise to the patterns. This provided a uniform spatial-frequency profile for all patterns, which did not influence the decrease in RT with increasing ratio but abolished the elevated RTs to golden-sectioned patterns. This suggests that optical limitation in the form of reduced inter-neural synchronization during spatial-frequency coding may be the foundation for the perceptual effects of golden sectioning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4495923 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44959232015-07-15 The Golden Section as Optical Limitation Elliott, Mark A. Kelly, Joy Friedel, Jonas Brodsky, Jennifer Mulcahy, Paul PLoS One Research Article The golden section, ϕ = (1 + √5)/2 = 1.618… and its companion ϕ = 1/ϕ = ϕ -1 = 0.618…, are irrational numbers which for centuries were believed to confer aesthetic appeal. In line with the presence of golden sectioning in natural growth patterns, recent EEG recordings show an absence of coherence between brain frequencies related by the golden ratio, suggesting the potential relevance of the golden section to brain dynamics. Using Mondrian-type patterns comprising a number of paired sections in a range of five section-section areal ratios (including golden-sectioned pairs), participants were asked to indicate as rapidly and accurately as possible the polarity (light or dark) of the smallest section in the patterns. They were also asked to independently assess the aesthetic appeal of the patterns. No preference was found for golden-sectioned patterns, while reaction times (RTs) tended to decrease overall with increasing ratio independently of each pattern’s fractal dimensionality. (Fractal dimensionality was unrelated to ratio and measured in terms of the Minkowski-Bouligand box-counting dimension). The ease of detecting the smallest section also decreased with increasing ratio, although RTs were found to be substantially slower for golden-sectioned patterns under 8-paired sectioned conditions. This was confirmed by a significant linear relationship between RT and ratio (p <.001) only when the golden-sectioned RTs were excluded [the relationship was non-significant for the full complement of ratios (p = .217)]. Image analysis revealed an absence of spatial frequencies between 4 and 8 cycles-per-degree that was exclusive to the 8-paired (golden)-sectioned patterns. The significance of this was demonstrated in a subsequent experiment by addition of uniformly distributed random noise to the patterns. This provided a uniform spatial-frequency profile for all patterns, which did not influence the decrease in RT with increasing ratio but abolished the elevated RTs to golden-sectioned patterns. This suggests that optical limitation in the form of reduced inter-neural synchronization during spatial-frequency coding may be the foundation for the perceptual effects of golden sectioning. Public Library of Science 2015-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4495923/ /pubmed/26154761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131045 Text en © 2015 Elliott et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Elliott, Mark A. Kelly, Joy Friedel, Jonas Brodsky, Jennifer Mulcahy, Paul The Golden Section as Optical Limitation |
title | The Golden Section as Optical Limitation |
title_full | The Golden Section as Optical Limitation |
title_fullStr | The Golden Section as Optical Limitation |
title_full_unstemmed | The Golden Section as Optical Limitation |
title_short | The Golden Section as Optical Limitation |
title_sort | golden section as optical limitation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4495923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26154761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131045 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elliottmarka thegoldensectionasopticallimitation AT kellyjoy thegoldensectionasopticallimitation AT friedeljonas thegoldensectionasopticallimitation AT brodskyjennifer thegoldensectionasopticallimitation AT mulcahypaul thegoldensectionasopticallimitation AT elliottmarka goldensectionasopticallimitation AT kellyjoy goldensectionasopticallimitation AT friedeljonas goldensectionasopticallimitation AT brodskyjennifer goldensectionasopticallimitation AT mulcahypaul goldensectionasopticallimitation |