Cargando…

The Golden Section as Optical Limitation

The golden section, ϕ = (1 + √5)/2 = 1.618… and its companion ϕ = 1/ϕ = ϕ -1 = 0.618…, are irrational numbers which for centuries were believed to confer aesthetic appeal. In line with the presence of golden sectioning in natural growth patterns, recent EEG recordings show an absence of coherence be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elliott, Mark A., Kelly, Joy, Friedel, Jonas, Brodsky, Jennifer, Mulcahy, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4495923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26154761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131045
_version_ 1782380319208374272
author Elliott, Mark A.
Kelly, Joy
Friedel, Jonas
Brodsky, Jennifer
Mulcahy, Paul
author_facet Elliott, Mark A.
Kelly, Joy
Friedel, Jonas
Brodsky, Jennifer
Mulcahy, Paul
author_sort Elliott, Mark A.
collection PubMed
description The golden section, ϕ = (1 + √5)/2 = 1.618… and its companion ϕ = 1/ϕ = ϕ -1 = 0.618…, are irrational numbers which for centuries were believed to confer aesthetic appeal. In line with the presence of golden sectioning in natural growth patterns, recent EEG recordings show an absence of coherence between brain frequencies related by the golden ratio, suggesting the potential relevance of the golden section to brain dynamics. Using Mondrian-type patterns comprising a number of paired sections in a range of five section-section areal ratios (including golden-sectioned pairs), participants were asked to indicate as rapidly and accurately as possible the polarity (light or dark) of the smallest section in the patterns. They were also asked to independently assess the aesthetic appeal of the patterns. No preference was found for golden-sectioned patterns, while reaction times (RTs) tended to decrease overall with increasing ratio independently of each pattern’s fractal dimensionality. (Fractal dimensionality was unrelated to ratio and measured in terms of the Minkowski-Bouligand box-counting dimension). The ease of detecting the smallest section also decreased with increasing ratio, although RTs were found to be substantially slower for golden-sectioned patterns under 8-paired sectioned conditions. This was confirmed by a significant linear relationship between RT and ratio (p <.001) only when the golden-sectioned RTs were excluded [the relationship was non-significant for the full complement of ratios (p = .217)]. Image analysis revealed an absence of spatial frequencies between 4 and 8 cycles-per-degree that was exclusive to the 8-paired (golden)-sectioned patterns. The significance of this was demonstrated in a subsequent experiment by addition of uniformly distributed random noise to the patterns. This provided a uniform spatial-frequency profile for all patterns, which did not influence the decrease in RT with increasing ratio but abolished the elevated RTs to golden-sectioned patterns. This suggests that optical limitation in the form of reduced inter-neural synchronization during spatial-frequency coding may be the foundation for the perceptual effects of golden sectioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4495923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44959232015-07-15 The Golden Section as Optical Limitation Elliott, Mark A. Kelly, Joy Friedel, Jonas Brodsky, Jennifer Mulcahy, Paul PLoS One Research Article The golden section, ϕ = (1 + √5)/2 = 1.618… and its companion ϕ = 1/ϕ = ϕ -1 = 0.618…, are irrational numbers which for centuries were believed to confer aesthetic appeal. In line with the presence of golden sectioning in natural growth patterns, recent EEG recordings show an absence of coherence between brain frequencies related by the golden ratio, suggesting the potential relevance of the golden section to brain dynamics. Using Mondrian-type patterns comprising a number of paired sections in a range of five section-section areal ratios (including golden-sectioned pairs), participants were asked to indicate as rapidly and accurately as possible the polarity (light or dark) of the smallest section in the patterns. They were also asked to independently assess the aesthetic appeal of the patterns. No preference was found for golden-sectioned patterns, while reaction times (RTs) tended to decrease overall with increasing ratio independently of each pattern’s fractal dimensionality. (Fractal dimensionality was unrelated to ratio and measured in terms of the Minkowski-Bouligand box-counting dimension). The ease of detecting the smallest section also decreased with increasing ratio, although RTs were found to be substantially slower for golden-sectioned patterns under 8-paired sectioned conditions. This was confirmed by a significant linear relationship between RT and ratio (p <.001) only when the golden-sectioned RTs were excluded [the relationship was non-significant for the full complement of ratios (p = .217)]. Image analysis revealed an absence of spatial frequencies between 4 and 8 cycles-per-degree that was exclusive to the 8-paired (golden)-sectioned patterns. The significance of this was demonstrated in a subsequent experiment by addition of uniformly distributed random noise to the patterns. This provided a uniform spatial-frequency profile for all patterns, which did not influence the decrease in RT with increasing ratio but abolished the elevated RTs to golden-sectioned patterns. This suggests that optical limitation in the form of reduced inter-neural synchronization during spatial-frequency coding may be the foundation for the perceptual effects of golden sectioning. Public Library of Science 2015-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4495923/ /pubmed/26154761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131045 Text en © 2015 Elliott et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Elliott, Mark A.
Kelly, Joy
Friedel, Jonas
Brodsky, Jennifer
Mulcahy, Paul
The Golden Section as Optical Limitation
title The Golden Section as Optical Limitation
title_full The Golden Section as Optical Limitation
title_fullStr The Golden Section as Optical Limitation
title_full_unstemmed The Golden Section as Optical Limitation
title_short The Golden Section as Optical Limitation
title_sort golden section as optical limitation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4495923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26154761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131045
work_keys_str_mv AT elliottmarka thegoldensectionasopticallimitation
AT kellyjoy thegoldensectionasopticallimitation
AT friedeljonas thegoldensectionasopticallimitation
AT brodskyjennifer thegoldensectionasopticallimitation
AT mulcahypaul thegoldensectionasopticallimitation
AT elliottmarka goldensectionasopticallimitation
AT kellyjoy goldensectionasopticallimitation
AT friedeljonas goldensectionasopticallimitation
AT brodskyjennifer goldensectionasopticallimitation
AT mulcahypaul goldensectionasopticallimitation