Cargando…

A preliminary investigation of genetic counselors’ information needs when receiving a variant of uncertain significance result: a mixed methods study

PURPOSE: To explore genetic counselors’ information preferences on reports of variant of uncertain significance (VUS) results from cancer genetic testing. METHODS: This mixed methods report (quantitative and qualitative approaches) utilized a survey of genetic counselors containing closed- and open-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scherr, Courtney L., Lindor, Noralane M., Malo, Teri L., Couch, Fergus J., Vadaparampil, Susan T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4496326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25569439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.185
_version_ 1782380381288267776
author Scherr, Courtney L.
Lindor, Noralane M.
Malo, Teri L.
Couch, Fergus J.
Vadaparampil, Susan T.
author_facet Scherr, Courtney L.
Lindor, Noralane M.
Malo, Teri L.
Couch, Fergus J.
Vadaparampil, Susan T.
author_sort Scherr, Courtney L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To explore genetic counselors’ information preferences on reports of variant of uncertain significance (VUS) results from cancer genetic testing. METHODS: This mixed methods report (quantitative and qualitative approaches) utilized a survey of genetic counselors containing closed- and open-ended questions to explore genetic counselors’ information needs and perceptions of the industry’s current information sharing practices. Descriptive statistics were calculated for responses to the closed-ended questions and thematic analysis guided the interpretation of the open-ended questions. RESULTS: Of the 267 participants (28.6% response rate), the majority indicated a perceived lack of information on VUS laboratory reports, were concerned about the perceived practice of withholding information, and stated the information they wanted to see. Although most did not indicate how additional information would be used, some reported they would provide information directly to patients, and others reported the information would be used to contextualize the VUS result when counseling patients. CONCLUSION: This analysis identified information genetic counselors believe is needed on VUS reports indicating what they believe are best practices in lieu of guidelines for laboratories currently providing genetic testing services, and implies needed guidelines for reporting VUS. Future studies should explore how genetic counselors use additional information contained on VUS reports.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4496326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44963262016-03-02 A preliminary investigation of genetic counselors’ information needs when receiving a variant of uncertain significance result: a mixed methods study Scherr, Courtney L. Lindor, Noralane M. Malo, Teri L. Couch, Fergus J. Vadaparampil, Susan T. Genet Med Article PURPOSE: To explore genetic counselors’ information preferences on reports of variant of uncertain significance (VUS) results from cancer genetic testing. METHODS: This mixed methods report (quantitative and qualitative approaches) utilized a survey of genetic counselors containing closed- and open-ended questions to explore genetic counselors’ information needs and perceptions of the industry’s current information sharing practices. Descriptive statistics were calculated for responses to the closed-ended questions and thematic analysis guided the interpretation of the open-ended questions. RESULTS: Of the 267 participants (28.6% response rate), the majority indicated a perceived lack of information on VUS laboratory reports, were concerned about the perceived practice of withholding information, and stated the information they wanted to see. Although most did not indicate how additional information would be used, some reported they would provide information directly to patients, and others reported the information would be used to contextualize the VUS result when counseling patients. CONCLUSION: This analysis identified information genetic counselors believe is needed on VUS reports indicating what they believe are best practices in lieu of guidelines for laboratories currently providing genetic testing services, and implies needed guidelines for reporting VUS. Future studies should explore how genetic counselors use additional information contained on VUS reports. 2015-01-08 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4496326/ /pubmed/25569439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.185 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Scherr, Courtney L.
Lindor, Noralane M.
Malo, Teri L.
Couch, Fergus J.
Vadaparampil, Susan T.
A preliminary investigation of genetic counselors’ information needs when receiving a variant of uncertain significance result: a mixed methods study
title A preliminary investigation of genetic counselors’ information needs when receiving a variant of uncertain significance result: a mixed methods study
title_full A preliminary investigation of genetic counselors’ information needs when receiving a variant of uncertain significance result: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr A preliminary investigation of genetic counselors’ information needs when receiving a variant of uncertain significance result: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed A preliminary investigation of genetic counselors’ information needs when receiving a variant of uncertain significance result: a mixed methods study
title_short A preliminary investigation of genetic counselors’ information needs when receiving a variant of uncertain significance result: a mixed methods study
title_sort preliminary investigation of genetic counselors’ information needs when receiving a variant of uncertain significance result: a mixed methods study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4496326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25569439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.185
work_keys_str_mv AT scherrcourtneyl apreliminaryinvestigationofgeneticcounselorsinformationneedswhenreceivingavariantofuncertainsignificanceresultamixedmethodsstudy
AT lindornoralanem apreliminaryinvestigationofgeneticcounselorsinformationneedswhenreceivingavariantofuncertainsignificanceresultamixedmethodsstudy
AT maloteril apreliminaryinvestigationofgeneticcounselorsinformationneedswhenreceivingavariantofuncertainsignificanceresultamixedmethodsstudy
AT couchfergusj apreliminaryinvestigationofgeneticcounselorsinformationneedswhenreceivingavariantofuncertainsignificanceresultamixedmethodsstudy
AT vadaparampilsusant apreliminaryinvestigationofgeneticcounselorsinformationneedswhenreceivingavariantofuncertainsignificanceresultamixedmethodsstudy
AT scherrcourtneyl preliminaryinvestigationofgeneticcounselorsinformationneedswhenreceivingavariantofuncertainsignificanceresultamixedmethodsstudy
AT lindornoralanem preliminaryinvestigationofgeneticcounselorsinformationneedswhenreceivingavariantofuncertainsignificanceresultamixedmethodsstudy
AT maloteril preliminaryinvestigationofgeneticcounselorsinformationneedswhenreceivingavariantofuncertainsignificanceresultamixedmethodsstudy
AT couchfergusj preliminaryinvestigationofgeneticcounselorsinformationneedswhenreceivingavariantofuncertainsignificanceresultamixedmethodsstudy
AT vadaparampilsusant preliminaryinvestigationofgeneticcounselorsinformationneedswhenreceivingavariantofuncertainsignificanceresultamixedmethodsstudy