Cargando…
Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia
Though the pathophysiology of dystonia remains uncertain, two primary factors implicated in the development of dystonic symptoms are excessive cortical excitability and impaired sensorimotor processing. The aim of this study was to determine the functional efficacy of an intervention combining repet...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4496570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26217209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00385 |
_version_ | 1782380427689852928 |
---|---|
author | Kimberley, Teresa J. Schmidt, Rebekah L. S. Chen, Mo Dykstra, Dennis D. Buetefisch, Cathrin M. |
author_facet | Kimberley, Teresa J. Schmidt, Rebekah L. S. Chen, Mo Dykstra, Dennis D. Buetefisch, Cathrin M. |
author_sort | Kimberley, Teresa J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Though the pathophysiology of dystonia remains uncertain, two primary factors implicated in the development of dystonic symptoms are excessive cortical excitability and impaired sensorimotor processing. The aim of this study was to determine the functional efficacy of an intervention combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and sensorimotor retraining. A randomized, single-subject, multiple baseline design with crossover was used to examine participants with focal hand dystonia (FHD) (n = 9). Intervention: 5 days rTMS + sensorimotor retraining (SMR) vs. Five days rTMS + control therapy (CTL) (which included stretching and massage). The rTMS was applied to the premotor cortex at 1 Hz at 80% resting motor threshold for 1200 pulses. For sensorimotor retraining, a subset of the Learning-based Sensorimotor Training program was followed. Each session in both groups consisted of rTMS followed immediately by 30 min of the therapy intervention (SMR or CTL). Contrary to our hypothesis, group analyses revealed no additional benefit from the SMR training vs. CTL. When analyzed across group however, there was significant improvement from the first baseline assessment in several measures, including tests of sensory ability and self-rated changes. The patient rated improvements were accompanied by a moderate effect size suggesting clinical meaningfulness. These results provide encouragement for further investigation of rTMS in FHD with a need to optimize a secondary intervention and determine likely responders vs. non-responders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4496570 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44965702015-07-27 Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia Kimberley, Teresa J. Schmidt, Rebekah L. S. Chen, Mo Dykstra, Dennis D. Buetefisch, Cathrin M. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Though the pathophysiology of dystonia remains uncertain, two primary factors implicated in the development of dystonic symptoms are excessive cortical excitability and impaired sensorimotor processing. The aim of this study was to determine the functional efficacy of an intervention combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and sensorimotor retraining. A randomized, single-subject, multiple baseline design with crossover was used to examine participants with focal hand dystonia (FHD) (n = 9). Intervention: 5 days rTMS + sensorimotor retraining (SMR) vs. Five days rTMS + control therapy (CTL) (which included stretching and massage). The rTMS was applied to the premotor cortex at 1 Hz at 80% resting motor threshold for 1200 pulses. For sensorimotor retraining, a subset of the Learning-based Sensorimotor Training program was followed. Each session in both groups consisted of rTMS followed immediately by 30 min of the therapy intervention (SMR or CTL). Contrary to our hypothesis, group analyses revealed no additional benefit from the SMR training vs. CTL. When analyzed across group however, there was significant improvement from the first baseline assessment in several measures, including tests of sensory ability and self-rated changes. The patient rated improvements were accompanied by a moderate effect size suggesting clinical meaningfulness. These results provide encouragement for further investigation of rTMS in FHD with a need to optimize a secondary intervention and determine likely responders vs. non-responders. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4496570/ /pubmed/26217209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00385 Text en Copyright © 2015 Kimberley, Schmidt, Chen, Dykstra and Buetefisch. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Kimberley, Teresa J. Schmidt, Rebekah L. S. Chen, Mo Dykstra, Dennis D. Buetefisch, Cathrin M. Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia |
title | Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia |
title_full | Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia |
title_fullStr | Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia |
title_full_unstemmed | Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia |
title_short | Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia |
title_sort | mixed effectiveness of rtms and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4496570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26217209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00385 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimberleyteresaj mixedeffectivenessofrtmsandretraininginthetreatmentoffocalhanddystonia AT schmidtrebekahls mixedeffectivenessofrtmsandretraininginthetreatmentoffocalhanddystonia AT chenmo mixedeffectivenessofrtmsandretraininginthetreatmentoffocalhanddystonia AT dykstradennisd mixedeffectivenessofrtmsandretraininginthetreatmentoffocalhanddystonia AT buetefischcathrinm mixedeffectivenessofrtmsandretraininginthetreatmentoffocalhanddystonia |