Cargando…

Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia

Though the pathophysiology of dystonia remains uncertain, two primary factors implicated in the development of dystonic symptoms are excessive cortical excitability and impaired sensorimotor processing. The aim of this study was to determine the functional efficacy of an intervention combining repet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kimberley, Teresa J., Schmidt, Rebekah L. S., Chen, Mo, Dykstra, Dennis D., Buetefisch, Cathrin M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4496570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26217209
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00385
_version_ 1782380427689852928
author Kimberley, Teresa J.
Schmidt, Rebekah L. S.
Chen, Mo
Dykstra, Dennis D.
Buetefisch, Cathrin M.
author_facet Kimberley, Teresa J.
Schmidt, Rebekah L. S.
Chen, Mo
Dykstra, Dennis D.
Buetefisch, Cathrin M.
author_sort Kimberley, Teresa J.
collection PubMed
description Though the pathophysiology of dystonia remains uncertain, two primary factors implicated in the development of dystonic symptoms are excessive cortical excitability and impaired sensorimotor processing. The aim of this study was to determine the functional efficacy of an intervention combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and sensorimotor retraining. A randomized, single-subject, multiple baseline design with crossover was used to examine participants with focal hand dystonia (FHD) (n = 9). Intervention: 5 days rTMS + sensorimotor retraining (SMR) vs. Five days rTMS + control therapy (CTL) (which included stretching and massage). The rTMS was applied to the premotor cortex at 1 Hz at 80% resting motor threshold for 1200 pulses. For sensorimotor retraining, a subset of the Learning-based Sensorimotor Training program was followed. Each session in both groups consisted of rTMS followed immediately by 30 min of the therapy intervention (SMR or CTL). Contrary to our hypothesis, group analyses revealed no additional benefit from the SMR training vs. CTL. When analyzed across group however, there was significant improvement from the first baseline assessment in several measures, including tests of sensory ability and self-rated changes. The patient rated improvements were accompanied by a moderate effect size suggesting clinical meaningfulness. These results provide encouragement for further investigation of rTMS in FHD with a need to optimize a secondary intervention and determine likely responders vs. non-responders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4496570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44965702015-07-27 Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia Kimberley, Teresa J. Schmidt, Rebekah L. S. Chen, Mo Dykstra, Dennis D. Buetefisch, Cathrin M. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Though the pathophysiology of dystonia remains uncertain, two primary factors implicated in the development of dystonic symptoms are excessive cortical excitability and impaired sensorimotor processing. The aim of this study was to determine the functional efficacy of an intervention combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and sensorimotor retraining. A randomized, single-subject, multiple baseline design with crossover was used to examine participants with focal hand dystonia (FHD) (n = 9). Intervention: 5 days rTMS + sensorimotor retraining (SMR) vs. Five days rTMS + control therapy (CTL) (which included stretching and massage). The rTMS was applied to the premotor cortex at 1 Hz at 80% resting motor threshold for 1200 pulses. For sensorimotor retraining, a subset of the Learning-based Sensorimotor Training program was followed. Each session in both groups consisted of rTMS followed immediately by 30 min of the therapy intervention (SMR or CTL). Contrary to our hypothesis, group analyses revealed no additional benefit from the SMR training vs. CTL. When analyzed across group however, there was significant improvement from the first baseline assessment in several measures, including tests of sensory ability and self-rated changes. The patient rated improvements were accompanied by a moderate effect size suggesting clinical meaningfulness. These results provide encouragement for further investigation of rTMS in FHD with a need to optimize a secondary intervention and determine likely responders vs. non-responders. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4496570/ /pubmed/26217209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00385 Text en Copyright © 2015 Kimberley, Schmidt, Chen, Dykstra and Buetefisch. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kimberley, Teresa J.
Schmidt, Rebekah L. S.
Chen, Mo
Dykstra, Dennis D.
Buetefisch, Cathrin M.
Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia
title Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia
title_full Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia
title_fullStr Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia
title_full_unstemmed Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia
title_short Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia
title_sort mixed effectiveness of rtms and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4496570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26217209
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00385
work_keys_str_mv AT kimberleyteresaj mixedeffectivenessofrtmsandretraininginthetreatmentoffocalhanddystonia
AT schmidtrebekahls mixedeffectivenessofrtmsandretraininginthetreatmentoffocalhanddystonia
AT chenmo mixedeffectivenessofrtmsandretraininginthetreatmentoffocalhanddystonia
AT dykstradennisd mixedeffectivenessofrtmsandretraininginthetreatmentoffocalhanddystonia
AT buetefischcathrinm mixedeffectivenessofrtmsandretraininginthetreatmentoffocalhanddystonia