Cargando…
Arsenic Removal by Liquid Membranes
Water contamination with harmful arsenic compounds represents one of the most serious calamities of the last two centuries. Natural occurrence of the toxic metal has been revealed recently for 21 countries worldwide; the risk of arsenic intoxication is particularly high in Bangladesh and India but r...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4496637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25826756 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes5020150 |
_version_ | 1782380433103650816 |
---|---|
author | Marino, Tiziana Figoli, Alberto |
author_facet | Marino, Tiziana Figoli, Alberto |
author_sort | Marino, Tiziana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Water contamination with harmful arsenic compounds represents one of the most serious calamities of the last two centuries. Natural occurrence of the toxic metal has been revealed recently for 21 countries worldwide; the risk of arsenic intoxication is particularly high in Bangladesh and India but recently also Europe is facing similar problem. Liquid membranes (LMs) look like a promising alternative to the existing removal processes, showing numerous advantages in terms of energy consumption, efficiency, selectivity, and operational costs. The development of different LM configurations has been a matter of investigation by several researching groups, especially for the removal of As(III) and As(V) from aqueous solutions. Most of these LM systems are based on the use of phosphine oxides as carriers, when the metal removal is from sulfuric acid media. Particularly promising for water treatment is the hollow fiber supported liquid membrane (HFSLM) configuration, which offers high selectivity, easy transport of the targeted metal ions, large surface area, and non-stop flow process. The choice of organic extractant(s) plays an essential role in the efficiency of the arsenic removal. Emulsion liquid membrane (ELM) systems have not been extensively investigated so far, although encouraging results have started to appear in the literature. For such LM configuration, the most relevant step toward efficiency is the choice of the surfactant type and its concentration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4496637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44966372015-07-10 Arsenic Removal by Liquid Membranes Marino, Tiziana Figoli, Alberto Membranes (Basel) Review Water contamination with harmful arsenic compounds represents one of the most serious calamities of the last two centuries. Natural occurrence of the toxic metal has been revealed recently for 21 countries worldwide; the risk of arsenic intoxication is particularly high in Bangladesh and India but recently also Europe is facing similar problem. Liquid membranes (LMs) look like a promising alternative to the existing removal processes, showing numerous advantages in terms of energy consumption, efficiency, selectivity, and operational costs. The development of different LM configurations has been a matter of investigation by several researching groups, especially for the removal of As(III) and As(V) from aqueous solutions. Most of these LM systems are based on the use of phosphine oxides as carriers, when the metal removal is from sulfuric acid media. Particularly promising for water treatment is the hollow fiber supported liquid membrane (HFSLM) configuration, which offers high selectivity, easy transport of the targeted metal ions, large surface area, and non-stop flow process. The choice of organic extractant(s) plays an essential role in the efficiency of the arsenic removal. Emulsion liquid membrane (ELM) systems have not been extensively investigated so far, although encouraging results have started to appear in the literature. For such LM configuration, the most relevant step toward efficiency is the choice of the surfactant type and its concentration. MDPI 2015-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4496637/ /pubmed/25826756 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes5020150 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Marino, Tiziana Figoli, Alberto Arsenic Removal by Liquid Membranes |
title | Arsenic Removal by Liquid Membranes |
title_full | Arsenic Removal by Liquid Membranes |
title_fullStr | Arsenic Removal by Liquid Membranes |
title_full_unstemmed | Arsenic Removal by Liquid Membranes |
title_short | Arsenic Removal by Liquid Membranes |
title_sort | arsenic removal by liquid membranes |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4496637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25826756 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes5020150 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marinotiziana arsenicremovalbyliquidmembranes AT figolialberto arsenicremovalbyliquidmembranes |