Cargando…
What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies
In 1985, WHO stated that there was no justification for caesarean section (CS) rates higher than 10–15 % at population-level. While the CS rates worldwide have continued to increase in an unprecedented manner over the subsequent three decades, concern has been raised about the validity of the 1985 l...
Autores principales: | Betran, Ana Pilar, Torloni, Maria Regina, Zhang, Jun, Ye, Jiangfeng, Mikolajczyk, Rafael, Deneux-Tharaux, Catherine, Oladapo, Olufemi Taiwo, Souza, João Paulo, Tunçalp, Özge, Vogel, Joshua Peter, Gülmezoglu, Ahmet Metin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4496821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26093498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-015-0043-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A Systematic Review of the Robson Classification for Caesarean Section: What Works, Doesn't Work and How to Improve It
por: Betrán, Ana Pilar, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Determination of a single, universal threshold for caesarean section rate is not the way forward
por: Betrán, Ana Pilar, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: WHO recommendations
por: Opiyo, Newton, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population‐based ecological study with longitudinal data
por: Ye, J, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014
por: Betrán, Ana Pilar, et al.
Publicado: (2016)