Cargando…

Economics of image guidance and navigation in spine surgery

BACKGROUND: Image-guidance and navigation in spinal surgery is becoming more widely utilized. Several studies have shown the use of this technology to increase accuracy of pedicle screw placement, decrease the rates of revision surgery, and minimize radiation exposure. In this paper, the authors ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Khouja, Lutfi, Shweikeh, Faris, Pashman, Robert, Johnson, J. Patrick, Kim, Terrence T., Drazin, Doniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4496834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26167370
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.159381
_version_ 1782380466938052608
author Al-Khouja, Lutfi
Shweikeh, Faris
Pashman, Robert
Johnson, J. Patrick
Kim, Terrence T.
Drazin, Doniel
author_facet Al-Khouja, Lutfi
Shweikeh, Faris
Pashman, Robert
Johnson, J. Patrick
Kim, Terrence T.
Drazin, Doniel
author_sort Al-Khouja, Lutfi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Image-guidance and navigation in spinal surgery is becoming more widely utilized. Several studies have shown the use of this technology to increase accuracy of pedicle screw placement, decrease the rates of revision surgery, and minimize radiation exposure. In this paper, the authors analyze the economics of image-guided surgery (IGS) and navigation in spine surgery. METHODS: A literature review was performed using PubMed, the CEA Registry, and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database. Each article was screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria, including costs, reoperation, readmission rates, operating room time, and length of stay. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in the analysis. Six studies were identified to meet the inclusion criteria for reporting costs and seven met the criteria for analysis of efficacy. Average costs ranged from $17,650 to $39,643. Pedicle screw misplacement rates using IGS ranged from 1.20% to 15.07% while reoperation rates ranged from 0% to 7.42%. CONCLUSION: There is currently an insufficient amount of studies reporting on the economics of spinal navigation to accurately conclude on its cost-effectiveness in clinical practice. Although a few of these studies showed less costs associated with intraoperative imaging, none were able to establish a statistically significant difference. Preliminary findings drawn from this study indicate a possible cost-effectiveness advantage with IGS, but more comprehensive data on costs need to be reported in order to validate its utilization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4496834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44968342015-07-12 Economics of image guidance and navigation in spine surgery Al-Khouja, Lutfi Shweikeh, Faris Pashman, Robert Johnson, J. Patrick Kim, Terrence T. Drazin, Doniel Surg Neurol Int Surgical Neurology International: Spine BACKGROUND: Image-guidance and navigation in spinal surgery is becoming more widely utilized. Several studies have shown the use of this technology to increase accuracy of pedicle screw placement, decrease the rates of revision surgery, and minimize radiation exposure. In this paper, the authors analyze the economics of image-guided surgery (IGS) and navigation in spine surgery. METHODS: A literature review was performed using PubMed, the CEA Registry, and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database. Each article was screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria, including costs, reoperation, readmission rates, operating room time, and length of stay. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in the analysis. Six studies were identified to meet the inclusion criteria for reporting costs and seven met the criteria for analysis of efficacy. Average costs ranged from $17,650 to $39,643. Pedicle screw misplacement rates using IGS ranged from 1.20% to 15.07% while reoperation rates ranged from 0% to 7.42%. CONCLUSION: There is currently an insufficient amount of studies reporting on the economics of spinal navigation to accurately conclude on its cost-effectiveness in clinical practice. Although a few of these studies showed less costs associated with intraoperative imaging, none were able to establish a statistically significant difference. Preliminary findings drawn from this study indicate a possible cost-effectiveness advantage with IGS, but more comprehensive data on costs need to be reported in order to validate its utilization. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4496834/ /pubmed/26167370 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.159381 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Al-Khouja L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Surgical Neurology International: Spine
Al-Khouja, Lutfi
Shweikeh, Faris
Pashman, Robert
Johnson, J. Patrick
Kim, Terrence T.
Drazin, Doniel
Economics of image guidance and navigation in spine surgery
title Economics of image guidance and navigation in spine surgery
title_full Economics of image guidance and navigation in spine surgery
title_fullStr Economics of image guidance and navigation in spine surgery
title_full_unstemmed Economics of image guidance and navigation in spine surgery
title_short Economics of image guidance and navigation in spine surgery
title_sort economics of image guidance and navigation in spine surgery
topic Surgical Neurology International: Spine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4496834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26167370
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.159381
work_keys_str_mv AT alkhoujalutfi economicsofimageguidanceandnavigationinspinesurgery
AT shweikehfaris economicsofimageguidanceandnavigationinspinesurgery
AT pashmanrobert economicsofimageguidanceandnavigationinspinesurgery
AT johnsonjpatrick economicsofimageguidanceandnavigationinspinesurgery
AT kimterrencet economicsofimageguidanceandnavigationinspinesurgery
AT drazindoniel economicsofimageguidanceandnavigationinspinesurgery