Cargando…
The effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of cis/carboplatin plus gemcitabine, which was previously used for mesothelioma but with no recorded proof of its efficiency, compared with cis/carboplatin plus pemetrexed, which is known to be effective in mesothelioma, in comparable histor...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4496921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26156324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1519-z |
_version_ | 1782380485290229760 |
---|---|
author | Ak, Guntulu Metintas, Selma Akarsu, Muhittin Metintas, Muzaffer |
author_facet | Ak, Guntulu Metintas, Selma Akarsu, Muhittin Metintas, Muzaffer |
author_sort | Ak, Guntulu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of cis/carboplatin plus gemcitabine, which was previously used for mesothelioma but with no recorded proof of its efficiency, compared with cis/carboplatin plus pemetrexed, which is known to be effective in mesothelioma, in comparable historical groups of malignant pleural mesothelioma. METHODS: One hundred and sixteen patients received cis/carboplatin plus pemetrexed (group 1), while 30 patients received cis/carboplatin plus gemcitabine (group 2) between June 1999 and June 2012. The two groups were compared in terms of median survival and adverse events to chemotherapy. RESULTS: The mean ages of groups 1 and 2 were 60.7 and 60.8 years, respectively. Most of the patients (78.1 %) had epithelial type tumors, and 47 % of the patients had stage IV disease. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, asbestos exposure, histology, stage, Karnofsky performance status, presence of pleurodesis, prophylactic radiotherapy, second–line chemotherapy and median hemoglobin and serum albumin levels. The median survival time from diagnosis to death or the last day of follow up with a 95 % confidence interval was 12 ± 0.95 months (95 % CI: 10.15–13.85) for group 1 and 11.0 ± 1.09 months (95 % CI: 8.85–13.15) for group 2 (Log-Rank: 0.142; p = 0.706). The median survival time from treatment to death or the last day of follow-up with a 95 % confidence interval was 11.0 ± 0.99 months (95 % CI: 9.06–12.94) for group 1 and 11.0 ± 1.52 months (95 % CI: 8.02–13.97) for group 2 (Log-Rank: 0.584; p = 0.445). The stage and Karnofsky performance status were found to be significant variables on median survival time by univariate analysis. After adjusting for the stage and Karnofsky performance status, the chemotherapy schema was not impressive on median survival time (OR: 0.837; 95 % CI: 0.548–1.277; p = 0.409). The progression free survival was 7.0 ± 0.61 months for group I and 6.0 ± 1.56 months for group II (Log-Rank: 0.522; p = 0.470). The treatment was generally well tolerated, and the side effects were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates that platinum-based gemcitabine is effective and a safe schema in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Further research should include large randomized phase III trials comparing these agents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4496921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44969212015-07-10 The effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma Ak, Guntulu Metintas, Selma Akarsu, Muhittin Metintas, Muzaffer BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of cis/carboplatin plus gemcitabine, which was previously used for mesothelioma but with no recorded proof of its efficiency, compared with cis/carboplatin plus pemetrexed, which is known to be effective in mesothelioma, in comparable historical groups of malignant pleural mesothelioma. METHODS: One hundred and sixteen patients received cis/carboplatin plus pemetrexed (group 1), while 30 patients received cis/carboplatin plus gemcitabine (group 2) between June 1999 and June 2012. The two groups were compared in terms of median survival and adverse events to chemotherapy. RESULTS: The mean ages of groups 1 and 2 were 60.7 and 60.8 years, respectively. Most of the patients (78.1 %) had epithelial type tumors, and 47 % of the patients had stage IV disease. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, asbestos exposure, histology, stage, Karnofsky performance status, presence of pleurodesis, prophylactic radiotherapy, second–line chemotherapy and median hemoglobin and serum albumin levels. The median survival time from diagnosis to death or the last day of follow up with a 95 % confidence interval was 12 ± 0.95 months (95 % CI: 10.15–13.85) for group 1 and 11.0 ± 1.09 months (95 % CI: 8.85–13.15) for group 2 (Log-Rank: 0.142; p = 0.706). The median survival time from treatment to death or the last day of follow-up with a 95 % confidence interval was 11.0 ± 0.99 months (95 % CI: 9.06–12.94) for group 1 and 11.0 ± 1.52 months (95 % CI: 8.02–13.97) for group 2 (Log-Rank: 0.584; p = 0.445). The stage and Karnofsky performance status were found to be significant variables on median survival time by univariate analysis. After adjusting for the stage and Karnofsky performance status, the chemotherapy schema was not impressive on median survival time (OR: 0.837; 95 % CI: 0.548–1.277; p = 0.409). The progression free survival was 7.0 ± 0.61 months for group I and 6.0 ± 1.56 months for group II (Log-Rank: 0.522; p = 0.470). The treatment was generally well tolerated, and the side effects were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates that platinum-based gemcitabine is effective and a safe schema in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Further research should include large randomized phase III trials comparing these agents. BioMed Central 2015-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4496921/ /pubmed/26156324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1519-z Text en © Ak et al. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ak, Guntulu Metintas, Selma Akarsu, Muhittin Metintas, Muzaffer The effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma |
title | The effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma |
title_full | The effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma |
title_short | The effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma |
title_sort | effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4496921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26156324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1519-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akguntulu theeffectivenessandsafetyofplatinumbasedpemetrexedandplatinumbasedgemcitabinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma AT metintasselma theeffectivenessandsafetyofplatinumbasedpemetrexedandplatinumbasedgemcitabinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma AT akarsumuhittin theeffectivenessandsafetyofplatinumbasedpemetrexedandplatinumbasedgemcitabinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma AT metintasmuzaffer theeffectivenessandsafetyofplatinumbasedpemetrexedandplatinumbasedgemcitabinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma AT akguntulu effectivenessandsafetyofplatinumbasedpemetrexedandplatinumbasedgemcitabinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma AT metintasselma effectivenessandsafetyofplatinumbasedpemetrexedandplatinumbasedgemcitabinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma AT akarsumuhittin effectivenessandsafetyofplatinumbasedpemetrexedandplatinumbasedgemcitabinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma AT metintasmuzaffer effectivenessandsafetyofplatinumbasedpemetrexedandplatinumbasedgemcitabinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma |