Cargando…

The effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of cis/carboplatin plus gemcitabine, which was previously used for mesothelioma but with no recorded proof of its efficiency, compared with cis/carboplatin plus pemetrexed, which is known to be effective in mesothelioma, in comparable histor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ak, Guntulu, Metintas, Selma, Akarsu, Muhittin, Metintas, Muzaffer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4496921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26156324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1519-z
_version_ 1782380485290229760
author Ak, Guntulu
Metintas, Selma
Akarsu, Muhittin
Metintas, Muzaffer
author_facet Ak, Guntulu
Metintas, Selma
Akarsu, Muhittin
Metintas, Muzaffer
author_sort Ak, Guntulu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of cis/carboplatin plus gemcitabine, which was previously used for mesothelioma but with no recorded proof of its efficiency, compared with cis/carboplatin plus pemetrexed, which is known to be effective in mesothelioma, in comparable historical groups of malignant pleural mesothelioma. METHODS: One hundred and sixteen patients received cis/carboplatin plus pemetrexed (group 1), while 30 patients received cis/carboplatin plus gemcitabine (group 2) between June 1999 and June 2012. The two groups were compared in terms of median survival and adverse events to chemotherapy. RESULTS: The mean ages of groups 1 and 2 were 60.7 and 60.8 years, respectively. Most of the patients (78.1 %) had epithelial type tumors, and 47 % of the patients had stage IV disease. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, asbestos exposure, histology, stage, Karnofsky performance status, presence of pleurodesis, prophylactic radiotherapy, second–line chemotherapy and median hemoglobin and serum albumin levels. The median survival time from diagnosis to death or the last day of follow up with a 95 % confidence interval was 12 ± 0.95 months (95 % CI: 10.15–13.85) for group 1 and 11.0 ± 1.09 months (95 % CI: 8.85–13.15) for group 2 (Log-Rank: 0.142; p = 0.706). The median survival time from treatment to death or the last day of follow-up with a 95 % confidence interval was 11.0 ± 0.99 months (95 % CI: 9.06–12.94) for group 1 and 11.0 ± 1.52 months (95 % CI: 8.02–13.97) for group 2 (Log-Rank: 0.584; p = 0.445). The stage and Karnofsky performance status were found to be significant variables on median survival time by univariate analysis. After adjusting for the stage and Karnofsky performance status, the chemotherapy schema was not impressive on median survival time (OR: 0.837; 95 % CI: 0.548–1.277; p = 0.409). The progression free survival was 7.0 ± 0.61 months for group I and 6.0 ± 1.56 months for group II (Log-Rank: 0.522; p = 0.470). The treatment was generally well tolerated, and the side effects were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates that platinum-based gemcitabine is effective and a safe schema in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Further research should include large randomized phase III trials comparing these agents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4496921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44969212015-07-10 The effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma Ak, Guntulu Metintas, Selma Akarsu, Muhittin Metintas, Muzaffer BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of cis/carboplatin plus gemcitabine, which was previously used for mesothelioma but with no recorded proof of its efficiency, compared with cis/carboplatin plus pemetrexed, which is known to be effective in mesothelioma, in comparable historical groups of malignant pleural mesothelioma. METHODS: One hundred and sixteen patients received cis/carboplatin plus pemetrexed (group 1), while 30 patients received cis/carboplatin plus gemcitabine (group 2) between June 1999 and June 2012. The two groups were compared in terms of median survival and adverse events to chemotherapy. RESULTS: The mean ages of groups 1 and 2 were 60.7 and 60.8 years, respectively. Most of the patients (78.1 %) had epithelial type tumors, and 47 % of the patients had stage IV disease. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, asbestos exposure, histology, stage, Karnofsky performance status, presence of pleurodesis, prophylactic radiotherapy, second–line chemotherapy and median hemoglobin and serum albumin levels. The median survival time from diagnosis to death or the last day of follow up with a 95 % confidence interval was 12 ± 0.95 months (95 % CI: 10.15–13.85) for group 1 and 11.0 ± 1.09 months (95 % CI: 8.85–13.15) for group 2 (Log-Rank: 0.142; p = 0.706). The median survival time from treatment to death or the last day of follow-up with a 95 % confidence interval was 11.0 ± 0.99 months (95 % CI: 9.06–12.94) for group 1 and 11.0 ± 1.52 months (95 % CI: 8.02–13.97) for group 2 (Log-Rank: 0.584; p = 0.445). The stage and Karnofsky performance status were found to be significant variables on median survival time by univariate analysis. After adjusting for the stage and Karnofsky performance status, the chemotherapy schema was not impressive on median survival time (OR: 0.837; 95 % CI: 0.548–1.277; p = 0.409). The progression free survival was 7.0 ± 0.61 months for group I and 6.0 ± 1.56 months for group II (Log-Rank: 0.522; p = 0.470). The treatment was generally well tolerated, and the side effects were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates that platinum-based gemcitabine is effective and a safe schema in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Further research should include large randomized phase III trials comparing these agents. BioMed Central 2015-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4496921/ /pubmed/26156324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1519-z Text en © Ak et al. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ak, Guntulu
Metintas, Selma
Akarsu, Muhittin
Metintas, Muzaffer
The effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
title The effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
title_full The effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
title_fullStr The effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
title_short The effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
title_sort effectiveness and safety of platinum-based pemetrexed and platinum-based gemcitabine treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4496921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26156324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1519-z
work_keys_str_mv AT akguntulu theeffectivenessandsafetyofplatinumbasedpemetrexedandplatinumbasedgemcitabinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma
AT metintasselma theeffectivenessandsafetyofplatinumbasedpemetrexedandplatinumbasedgemcitabinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma
AT akarsumuhittin theeffectivenessandsafetyofplatinumbasedpemetrexedandplatinumbasedgemcitabinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma
AT metintasmuzaffer theeffectivenessandsafetyofplatinumbasedpemetrexedandplatinumbasedgemcitabinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma
AT akguntulu effectivenessandsafetyofplatinumbasedpemetrexedandplatinumbasedgemcitabinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma
AT metintasselma effectivenessandsafetyofplatinumbasedpemetrexedandplatinumbasedgemcitabinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma
AT akarsumuhittin effectivenessandsafetyofplatinumbasedpemetrexedandplatinumbasedgemcitabinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma
AT metintasmuzaffer effectivenessandsafetyofplatinumbasedpemetrexedandplatinumbasedgemcitabinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma