Cargando…
Intra-individual fasting versus postprandial variation of biochemical markers of liver fibrosis (FibroTest) and activity (ActiTest)
BACKGROUND: Biochemical marker combinations, including α(2)-macroglobulin, haptoglobin, apolipoprotein A1, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, and total bilirubin (all part of FibroTest) plus alanine aminotransferase (all part of ActiTest), are being developed as alternatives to liver biopsy in patients with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC449730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15214966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5926-3-3 |
_version_ | 1782121575229685760 |
---|---|
author | Munteanu, Mona Messous, Djamila Thabut, Dominique Imbert-Bismut, Françoise Jouys, Mathieu Massard, Julien Piton, Annie Bonyhay, Luminita Ratziu, Vlad Hainque, Bernard Poynard, Thierry |
author_facet | Munteanu, Mona Messous, Djamila Thabut, Dominique Imbert-Bismut, Françoise Jouys, Mathieu Massard, Julien Piton, Annie Bonyhay, Luminita Ratziu, Vlad Hainque, Bernard Poynard, Thierry |
author_sort | Munteanu, Mona |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Biochemical marker combinations, including α(2)-macroglobulin, haptoglobin, apolipoprotein A1, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, and total bilirubin (all part of FibroTest) plus alanine aminotransferase (all part of ActiTest), are being developed as alternatives to liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis C and other various chronic liver diseases. Considering this premise, the primary aim of this study was to assess the impact of meal intake on FibroTest and ActiTest results. Such studies are very important for patients, as many clinical errors have been related to the absence of baseline evidence. RESULTS: Intra-individual variation was assessed for the 6 above components and for FibroTest and ActiTest, by measuring time dependent variations before and one hour after a standard meal in 64 subjects. These consisted of 29 healthy volunteers and 35 patients with chronic liver diseases. Meal intake had no significant impact on any of the six components, or on FibroTest or ActiTest, as assessed by repeated measure variance analyses (ANOVA all p > 0.90); the Spearman correlation coefficient ranged from 0.87 (total bilirubin) to 0.995 (γ-glutamyl transpeptidase). The coefficients of variation (CV) between fasting and postprandial measurements fluctuated for the six components from 0.09 (apolipoprotein A1) to 0.14 (α(2)-macroglobulin), and from 0.09 for FibroTest to 0.13 for ActiTest. In contrast, meal intake had a significant impact on triglycerides (ANOVA p = 0.01, CV = 0.65) and glucose (ANOVA p = 0.04, CV = 0.31). As for the prediction of liver injury, the concordance between fasting and postprandial predicted histological stages and grades was almost perfect, both for FibroTest (kappa = 0.91, p < 0.001) and ActiTest (kappa = 0.80, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The intra-individual variation of biochemical markers was low, and it was shown that measurements of FibroTest, ActiTest and their components are not significantly modified by meal intake. This fact makes the screening of patients at risk of chronic liver diseases more convenient. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-449730 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-4497302004-07-10 Intra-individual fasting versus postprandial variation of biochemical markers of liver fibrosis (FibroTest) and activity (ActiTest) Munteanu, Mona Messous, Djamila Thabut, Dominique Imbert-Bismut, Françoise Jouys, Mathieu Massard, Julien Piton, Annie Bonyhay, Luminita Ratziu, Vlad Hainque, Bernard Poynard, Thierry Comp Hepatol Research BACKGROUND: Biochemical marker combinations, including α(2)-macroglobulin, haptoglobin, apolipoprotein A1, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, and total bilirubin (all part of FibroTest) plus alanine aminotransferase (all part of ActiTest), are being developed as alternatives to liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis C and other various chronic liver diseases. Considering this premise, the primary aim of this study was to assess the impact of meal intake on FibroTest and ActiTest results. Such studies are very important for patients, as many clinical errors have been related to the absence of baseline evidence. RESULTS: Intra-individual variation was assessed for the 6 above components and for FibroTest and ActiTest, by measuring time dependent variations before and one hour after a standard meal in 64 subjects. These consisted of 29 healthy volunteers and 35 patients with chronic liver diseases. Meal intake had no significant impact on any of the six components, or on FibroTest or ActiTest, as assessed by repeated measure variance analyses (ANOVA all p > 0.90); the Spearman correlation coefficient ranged from 0.87 (total bilirubin) to 0.995 (γ-glutamyl transpeptidase). The coefficients of variation (CV) between fasting and postprandial measurements fluctuated for the six components from 0.09 (apolipoprotein A1) to 0.14 (α(2)-macroglobulin), and from 0.09 for FibroTest to 0.13 for ActiTest. In contrast, meal intake had a significant impact on triglycerides (ANOVA p = 0.01, CV = 0.65) and glucose (ANOVA p = 0.04, CV = 0.31). As for the prediction of liver injury, the concordance between fasting and postprandial predicted histological stages and grades was almost perfect, both for FibroTest (kappa = 0.91, p < 0.001) and ActiTest (kappa = 0.80, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The intra-individual variation of biochemical markers was low, and it was shown that measurements of FibroTest, ActiTest and their components are not significantly modified by meal intake. This fact makes the screening of patients at risk of chronic liver diseases more convenient. BioMed Central 2004-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC449730/ /pubmed/15214966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5926-3-3 Text en Copyright © 2004 Munteanu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Munteanu, Mona Messous, Djamila Thabut, Dominique Imbert-Bismut, Françoise Jouys, Mathieu Massard, Julien Piton, Annie Bonyhay, Luminita Ratziu, Vlad Hainque, Bernard Poynard, Thierry Intra-individual fasting versus postprandial variation of biochemical markers of liver fibrosis (FibroTest) and activity (ActiTest) |
title | Intra-individual fasting versus postprandial variation of biochemical markers of liver fibrosis (FibroTest) and activity (ActiTest) |
title_full | Intra-individual fasting versus postprandial variation of biochemical markers of liver fibrosis (FibroTest) and activity (ActiTest) |
title_fullStr | Intra-individual fasting versus postprandial variation of biochemical markers of liver fibrosis (FibroTest) and activity (ActiTest) |
title_full_unstemmed | Intra-individual fasting versus postprandial variation of biochemical markers of liver fibrosis (FibroTest) and activity (ActiTest) |
title_short | Intra-individual fasting versus postprandial variation of biochemical markers of liver fibrosis (FibroTest) and activity (ActiTest) |
title_sort | intra-individual fasting versus postprandial variation of biochemical markers of liver fibrosis (fibrotest) and activity (actitest) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC449730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15214966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5926-3-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munteanumona intraindividualfastingversuspostprandialvariationofbiochemicalmarkersofliverfibrosisfibrotestandactivityactitest AT messousdjamila intraindividualfastingversuspostprandialvariationofbiochemicalmarkersofliverfibrosisfibrotestandactivityactitest AT thabutdominique intraindividualfastingversuspostprandialvariationofbiochemicalmarkersofliverfibrosisfibrotestandactivityactitest AT imbertbismutfrancoise intraindividualfastingversuspostprandialvariationofbiochemicalmarkersofliverfibrosisfibrotestandactivityactitest AT jouysmathieu intraindividualfastingversuspostprandialvariationofbiochemicalmarkersofliverfibrosisfibrotestandactivityactitest AT massardjulien intraindividualfastingversuspostprandialvariationofbiochemicalmarkersofliverfibrosisfibrotestandactivityactitest AT pitonannie intraindividualfastingversuspostprandialvariationofbiochemicalmarkersofliverfibrosisfibrotestandactivityactitest AT bonyhayluminita intraindividualfastingversuspostprandialvariationofbiochemicalmarkersofliverfibrosisfibrotestandactivityactitest AT ratziuvlad intraindividualfastingversuspostprandialvariationofbiochemicalmarkersofliverfibrosisfibrotestandactivityactitest AT hainquebernard intraindividualfastingversuspostprandialvariationofbiochemicalmarkersofliverfibrosisfibrotestandactivityactitest AT poynardthierry intraindividualfastingversuspostprandialvariationofbiochemicalmarkersofliverfibrosisfibrotestandactivityactitest |