Cargando…
125 Cases of duodenoduodenostomy in pancreas transplantation: a single-centre experience of an alternative enteric drainage
Several exocrine drainage procedures have been successfully developed to perform pancreas transplantation (PT). Retroperitoneal graft placement allows exocrine drainage via direct duodenoduodenostomy (DD). This technique provides easy access for endoscopic surveillance and biopsy. A total of 241 PT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4497354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24750305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.12337 |
_version_ | 1782380503539646464 |
---|---|
author | Walter, Martin Jazra, Martin Kykalos, Stylianos Kuehn, Petra Michalski, Stefan Klein, Thomas Wunsch, Andreas Viebahn, Richard Schenker, Peter |
author_facet | Walter, Martin Jazra, Martin Kykalos, Stylianos Kuehn, Petra Michalski, Stefan Klein, Thomas Wunsch, Andreas Viebahn, Richard Schenker, Peter |
author_sort | Walter, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several exocrine drainage procedures have been successfully developed to perform pancreas transplantation (PT). Retroperitoneal graft placement allows exocrine drainage via direct duodenoduodenostomy (DD). This technique provides easy access for endoscopic surveillance and biopsy. A total of 241 PT procedures were performed in our centre between 2002 and 2012. DD was performed in 125 patients, and duodenojejunostomy (DJ) in 116 patients. We retrospectively compared our experience with these two types of enteric drainage, focusing on graft and patient survivals, as well as postoperative complications. With a mean follow-up of 59 months, both groups demonstrated comparable patient and graft survivals. 14 (11%) of 125 cases in the DD group and 21 (18%) of 116 cases in the DJ group had pancreatic graft loss (P = 0.142). Graft thrombosis [5 (4%) vs. 18 (16%) P = 0.002], anastomotic insufficiency [2 (1.6%) vs. 8 (7%) P = 0.052] and relaparotomy [52 (41%) vs. 56 (48%) P = 0.29] occurred more frequently in the DJ group, whereas gastrointestinal bleeding [14 (11%) vs. 4 (3%) P = 0.026] occurred more often in the DD group. DD is a feasible and safe technique in PT, with no increase in enteric complications. It is equivalent to other established techniques and extends the feasibility of anastomotic sites, especially in recipients who have undergone a second transplantation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4497354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44973542015-07-10 125 Cases of duodenoduodenostomy in pancreas transplantation: a single-centre experience of an alternative enteric drainage Walter, Martin Jazra, Martin Kykalos, Stylianos Kuehn, Petra Michalski, Stefan Klein, Thomas Wunsch, Andreas Viebahn, Richard Schenker, Peter Transpl Int Clinical Research Several exocrine drainage procedures have been successfully developed to perform pancreas transplantation (PT). Retroperitoneal graft placement allows exocrine drainage via direct duodenoduodenostomy (DD). This technique provides easy access for endoscopic surveillance and biopsy. A total of 241 PT procedures were performed in our centre between 2002 and 2012. DD was performed in 125 patients, and duodenojejunostomy (DJ) in 116 patients. We retrospectively compared our experience with these two types of enteric drainage, focusing on graft and patient survivals, as well as postoperative complications. With a mean follow-up of 59 months, both groups demonstrated comparable patient and graft survivals. 14 (11%) of 125 cases in the DD group and 21 (18%) of 116 cases in the DJ group had pancreatic graft loss (P = 0.142). Graft thrombosis [5 (4%) vs. 18 (16%) P = 0.002], anastomotic insufficiency [2 (1.6%) vs. 8 (7%) P = 0.052] and relaparotomy [52 (41%) vs. 56 (48%) P = 0.29] occurred more frequently in the DJ group, whereas gastrointestinal bleeding [14 (11%) vs. 4 (3%) P = 0.026] occurred more often in the DD group. DD is a feasible and safe technique in PT, with no increase in enteric complications. It is equivalent to other established techniques and extends the feasibility of anastomotic sites, especially in recipients who have undergone a second transplantation. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2014-08 2014-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4497354/ /pubmed/24750305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.12337 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Transplant International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Steunstichting ESOT http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Walter, Martin Jazra, Martin Kykalos, Stylianos Kuehn, Petra Michalski, Stefan Klein, Thomas Wunsch, Andreas Viebahn, Richard Schenker, Peter 125 Cases of duodenoduodenostomy in pancreas transplantation: a single-centre experience of an alternative enteric drainage |
title | 125 Cases of duodenoduodenostomy in pancreas transplantation: a single-centre experience of an alternative enteric drainage |
title_full | 125 Cases of duodenoduodenostomy in pancreas transplantation: a single-centre experience of an alternative enteric drainage |
title_fullStr | 125 Cases of duodenoduodenostomy in pancreas transplantation: a single-centre experience of an alternative enteric drainage |
title_full_unstemmed | 125 Cases of duodenoduodenostomy in pancreas transplantation: a single-centre experience of an alternative enteric drainage |
title_short | 125 Cases of duodenoduodenostomy in pancreas transplantation: a single-centre experience of an alternative enteric drainage |
title_sort | 125 cases of duodenoduodenostomy in pancreas transplantation: a single-centre experience of an alternative enteric drainage |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4497354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24750305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.12337 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waltermartin 125casesofduodenoduodenostomyinpancreastransplantationasinglecentreexperienceofanalternativeentericdrainage AT jazramartin 125casesofduodenoduodenostomyinpancreastransplantationasinglecentreexperienceofanalternativeentericdrainage AT kykalosstylianos 125casesofduodenoduodenostomyinpancreastransplantationasinglecentreexperienceofanalternativeentericdrainage AT kuehnpetra 125casesofduodenoduodenostomyinpancreastransplantationasinglecentreexperienceofanalternativeentericdrainage AT michalskistefan 125casesofduodenoduodenostomyinpancreastransplantationasinglecentreexperienceofanalternativeentericdrainage AT kleinthomas 125casesofduodenoduodenostomyinpancreastransplantationasinglecentreexperienceofanalternativeentericdrainage AT wunschandreas 125casesofduodenoduodenostomyinpancreastransplantationasinglecentreexperienceofanalternativeentericdrainage AT viebahnrichard 125casesofduodenoduodenostomyinpancreastransplantationasinglecentreexperienceofanalternativeentericdrainage AT schenkerpeter 125casesofduodenoduodenostomyinpancreastransplantationasinglecentreexperienceofanalternativeentericdrainage |