Cargando…

Discordance between physician-rated health and an objective health measure among institutionalized older people

BACKGROUND: Although physician-rated health is emerging as a potentially useful variable in research, with implications in practice, it has not been analyzed. Moreover, one of its most important aspects, namely, concordance with patients’ objective health state, has not been investigated. This study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Damián, Javier, Pastor-Barriuso, Roberto, Valderrama-Gama, Emiliana, de Pedro-Cuesta, Jesús
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4497415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26155790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0074-4
_version_ 1782380512064569344
author Damián, Javier
Pastor-Barriuso, Roberto
Valderrama-Gama, Emiliana
de Pedro-Cuesta, Jesús
author_facet Damián, Javier
Pastor-Barriuso, Roberto
Valderrama-Gama, Emiliana
de Pedro-Cuesta, Jesús
author_sort Damián, Javier
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although physician-rated health is emerging as a potentially useful variable in research, with implications in practice, it has not been analyzed. Moreover, one of its most important aspects, namely, concordance with patients’ objective health state, has not been investigated. This study sought to measure concordance between physician-rated health and an objective health measure, and assess both measures’ validity in predicting death. METHODS: The data for the study were drawn from a 1998–1999 survey and subsequent mortality follow-up of residential and nursing homes in Madrid (Spain). Study subjects were 630 residents aged ≥65 years, and their respective facility physicians. Measures included agreement between physicians’ rating of residents’ overall health (good, intermediate or poor) and an objective measure of residents’ health (good, intermediate or poor), based on functional capacity, cognitive status, and number of chronic conditions. Overrating was defined as any case where health, rated as good by a physician, was objectively rated as poor. RESULTS: Whereas 45 % of physicians and 55 % of residents rated their health as good, only 4 % of such residents had good objective health. Of those who received a physician rating of good/very good health, 39.0 % had poor objective health. There was evidence of clear overrating in 18 % of the population, and clear to moderate overrating in 73 % of the population. In terms of power to predict mortality, the pattern of behavior shown by the objective health measure was good, graded and congruent, and better than that shown by physician-rated health. CONCLUSION: Physician overrating of the overall health of older persons in residential and nursing homes, would appear to be very high. Although some degree of contextualization by physicians in this setting might be considered reasonable, the degree of overrating in our population seems nevertheless excessive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4497415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44974152015-07-10 Discordance between physician-rated health and an objective health measure among institutionalized older people Damián, Javier Pastor-Barriuso, Roberto Valderrama-Gama, Emiliana de Pedro-Cuesta, Jesús BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Although physician-rated health is emerging as a potentially useful variable in research, with implications in practice, it has not been analyzed. Moreover, one of its most important aspects, namely, concordance with patients’ objective health state, has not been investigated. This study sought to measure concordance between physician-rated health and an objective health measure, and assess both measures’ validity in predicting death. METHODS: The data for the study were drawn from a 1998–1999 survey and subsequent mortality follow-up of residential and nursing homes in Madrid (Spain). Study subjects were 630 residents aged ≥65 years, and their respective facility physicians. Measures included agreement between physicians’ rating of residents’ overall health (good, intermediate or poor) and an objective measure of residents’ health (good, intermediate or poor), based on functional capacity, cognitive status, and number of chronic conditions. Overrating was defined as any case where health, rated as good by a physician, was objectively rated as poor. RESULTS: Whereas 45 % of physicians and 55 % of residents rated their health as good, only 4 % of such residents had good objective health. Of those who received a physician rating of good/very good health, 39.0 % had poor objective health. There was evidence of clear overrating in 18 % of the population, and clear to moderate overrating in 73 % of the population. In terms of power to predict mortality, the pattern of behavior shown by the objective health measure was good, graded and congruent, and better than that shown by physician-rated health. CONCLUSION: Physician overrating of the overall health of older persons in residential and nursing homes, would appear to be very high. Although some degree of contextualization by physicians in this setting might be considered reasonable, the degree of overrating in our population seems nevertheless excessive. BioMed Central 2015-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4497415/ /pubmed/26155790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0074-4 Text en © Damián et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Damián, Javier
Pastor-Barriuso, Roberto
Valderrama-Gama, Emiliana
de Pedro-Cuesta, Jesús
Discordance between physician-rated health and an objective health measure among institutionalized older people
title Discordance between physician-rated health and an objective health measure among institutionalized older people
title_full Discordance between physician-rated health and an objective health measure among institutionalized older people
title_fullStr Discordance between physician-rated health and an objective health measure among institutionalized older people
title_full_unstemmed Discordance between physician-rated health and an objective health measure among institutionalized older people
title_short Discordance between physician-rated health and an objective health measure among institutionalized older people
title_sort discordance between physician-rated health and an objective health measure among institutionalized older people
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4497415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26155790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0074-4
work_keys_str_mv AT damianjavier discordancebetweenphysicianratedhealthandanobjectivehealthmeasureamonginstitutionalizedolderpeople
AT pastorbarriusoroberto discordancebetweenphysicianratedhealthandanobjectivehealthmeasureamonginstitutionalizedolderpeople
AT valderramagamaemiliana discordancebetweenphysicianratedhealthandanobjectivehealthmeasureamonginstitutionalizedolderpeople
AT depedrocuestajesus discordancebetweenphysicianratedhealthandanobjectivehealthmeasureamonginstitutionalizedolderpeople