Cargando…

Neoadjuvant FOLFOX 4 versus FOLFOX 4 with Cetuximab versus immediate surgery for high-risk stage II and III colon cancers: a multicentre randomised controlled phase II trial – the PRODIGE 22 - ECKINOXE trial

BACKGROUND: In patients with high risk stage II and stage III colon cancer (CC), curative surgery followed by adjuvant FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy has become the standard of care. However, for 20 to 30 % of these patients, the current curative treatment strategy of surgical excision followed by adjuvant c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karoui, Mehdi, Rullier, Anne, Luciani, Alain, Bonnetain, Franck, Auriault, Marie-Luce, Sarran, Antony, Monges, Geneviève, Trillaud, Hervé, Le Malicot, Karine, Leroy, Karen, Sobhani, Iradj, Bardier, Armelle, Moreau, Marie, Brindel, Isabelle, Seitz, Jean François, Taieb, Julien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4497499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26156156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1507-3
_version_ 1782380522310205440
author Karoui, Mehdi
Rullier, Anne
Luciani, Alain
Bonnetain, Franck
Auriault, Marie-Luce
Sarran, Antony
Monges, Geneviève
Trillaud, Hervé
Le Malicot, Karine
Leroy, Karen
Sobhani, Iradj
Bardier, Armelle
Moreau, Marie
Brindel, Isabelle
Seitz, Jean François
Taieb, Julien
author_facet Karoui, Mehdi
Rullier, Anne
Luciani, Alain
Bonnetain, Franck
Auriault, Marie-Luce
Sarran, Antony
Monges, Geneviève
Trillaud, Hervé
Le Malicot, Karine
Leroy, Karen
Sobhani, Iradj
Bardier, Armelle
Moreau, Marie
Brindel, Isabelle
Seitz, Jean François
Taieb, Julien
author_sort Karoui, Mehdi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In patients with high risk stage II and stage III colon cancer (CC), curative surgery followed by adjuvant FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy has become the standard of care. However, for 20 to 30 % of these patients, the current curative treatment strategy of surgical excision followed by adjuvant chemotherapy fails either to clear locoregional spread or to eradicate distant micrometastases, leading to disease recurrence. Preoperative chemotherapy is an attractive concept for these CCs and has the potential to impact upon both of these causes of failure. Optimum systemic therapy at the earliest possible opportunity may be more effective at eradicating distant metastases than the same treatment given after the delay and immunological stress of surgery. Added to this, shrinking the primary tumor before surgery may reduce the risk of incomplete surgical excision, and the risk of tumor cell shedding during surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: PRODIGE 22 - ECKINOXE is a multicenter randomized phase II trial designed to evaluate efficacy and feasibility of two chemotherapy regimens (FOLFOX-4 alone and FOLFOX-4 + Cetuximab) in a peri-operative strategy in patients with bulky CCs. Patients with CC deemed as high risk T3, T4 and/or N2 on initial abdominopelvic CT scan are randomized to either colectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy (control arm), or 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX-4 (for RAS mutated patients). In RAS wild-type patients a third arm testing FOLFOX+ cetuximab has been added prior to colectomy. Patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy arms will receive postoperative treatment for 4 months (8 cycles) to complete their therapeutic schedule. The primary endpoint of the study is the histological Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) as defined by Ryan. The secondary endpoints are: treatment strategy safety (toxicity, primary tumor related complications under chemotherapy, peri-operative morbidity), disease-free and recurrence free survivals at 3 years, quality of life, carcinologic quality and completeness of the surgery, initial radiological staging and radiological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the correlation between histopathological and radiological response. Taking into account a 50 % prevalence of CC without RAS mutation, accrual of 165 patients is needed for this Phase II trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01675999 (ClinicalTrials.gov)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4497499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44974992015-07-10 Neoadjuvant FOLFOX 4 versus FOLFOX 4 with Cetuximab versus immediate surgery for high-risk stage II and III colon cancers: a multicentre randomised controlled phase II trial – the PRODIGE 22 - ECKINOXE trial Karoui, Mehdi Rullier, Anne Luciani, Alain Bonnetain, Franck Auriault, Marie-Luce Sarran, Antony Monges, Geneviève Trillaud, Hervé Le Malicot, Karine Leroy, Karen Sobhani, Iradj Bardier, Armelle Moreau, Marie Brindel, Isabelle Seitz, Jean François Taieb, Julien BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In patients with high risk stage II and stage III colon cancer (CC), curative surgery followed by adjuvant FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy has become the standard of care. However, for 20 to 30 % of these patients, the current curative treatment strategy of surgical excision followed by adjuvant chemotherapy fails either to clear locoregional spread or to eradicate distant micrometastases, leading to disease recurrence. Preoperative chemotherapy is an attractive concept for these CCs and has the potential to impact upon both of these causes of failure. Optimum systemic therapy at the earliest possible opportunity may be more effective at eradicating distant metastases than the same treatment given after the delay and immunological stress of surgery. Added to this, shrinking the primary tumor before surgery may reduce the risk of incomplete surgical excision, and the risk of tumor cell shedding during surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: PRODIGE 22 - ECKINOXE is a multicenter randomized phase II trial designed to evaluate efficacy and feasibility of two chemotherapy regimens (FOLFOX-4 alone and FOLFOX-4 + Cetuximab) in a peri-operative strategy in patients with bulky CCs. Patients with CC deemed as high risk T3, T4 and/or N2 on initial abdominopelvic CT scan are randomized to either colectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy (control arm), or 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX-4 (for RAS mutated patients). In RAS wild-type patients a third arm testing FOLFOX+ cetuximab has been added prior to colectomy. Patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy arms will receive postoperative treatment for 4 months (8 cycles) to complete their therapeutic schedule. The primary endpoint of the study is the histological Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) as defined by Ryan. The secondary endpoints are: treatment strategy safety (toxicity, primary tumor related complications under chemotherapy, peri-operative morbidity), disease-free and recurrence free survivals at 3 years, quality of life, carcinologic quality and completeness of the surgery, initial radiological staging and radiological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the correlation between histopathological and radiological response. Taking into account a 50 % prevalence of CC without RAS mutation, accrual of 165 patients is needed for this Phase II trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01675999 (ClinicalTrials.gov) BioMed Central 2015-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4497499/ /pubmed/26156156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1507-3 Text en © Karoui et al. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Karoui, Mehdi
Rullier, Anne
Luciani, Alain
Bonnetain, Franck
Auriault, Marie-Luce
Sarran, Antony
Monges, Geneviève
Trillaud, Hervé
Le Malicot, Karine
Leroy, Karen
Sobhani, Iradj
Bardier, Armelle
Moreau, Marie
Brindel, Isabelle
Seitz, Jean François
Taieb, Julien
Neoadjuvant FOLFOX 4 versus FOLFOX 4 with Cetuximab versus immediate surgery for high-risk stage II and III colon cancers: a multicentre randomised controlled phase II trial – the PRODIGE 22 - ECKINOXE trial
title Neoadjuvant FOLFOX 4 versus FOLFOX 4 with Cetuximab versus immediate surgery for high-risk stage II and III colon cancers: a multicentre randomised controlled phase II trial – the PRODIGE 22 - ECKINOXE trial
title_full Neoadjuvant FOLFOX 4 versus FOLFOX 4 with Cetuximab versus immediate surgery for high-risk stage II and III colon cancers: a multicentre randomised controlled phase II trial – the PRODIGE 22 - ECKINOXE trial
title_fullStr Neoadjuvant FOLFOX 4 versus FOLFOX 4 with Cetuximab versus immediate surgery for high-risk stage II and III colon cancers: a multicentre randomised controlled phase II trial – the PRODIGE 22 - ECKINOXE trial
title_full_unstemmed Neoadjuvant FOLFOX 4 versus FOLFOX 4 with Cetuximab versus immediate surgery for high-risk stage II and III colon cancers: a multicentre randomised controlled phase II trial – the PRODIGE 22 - ECKINOXE trial
title_short Neoadjuvant FOLFOX 4 versus FOLFOX 4 with Cetuximab versus immediate surgery for high-risk stage II and III colon cancers: a multicentre randomised controlled phase II trial – the PRODIGE 22 - ECKINOXE trial
title_sort neoadjuvant folfox 4 versus folfox 4 with cetuximab versus immediate surgery for high-risk stage ii and iii colon cancers: a multicentre randomised controlled phase ii trial – the prodige 22 - eckinoxe trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4497499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26156156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1507-3
work_keys_str_mv AT karouimehdi neoadjuvantfolfox4versusfolfox4withcetuximabversusimmediatesurgeryforhighriskstageiiandiiicoloncancersamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphaseiitrialtheprodige22eckinoxetrial
AT rullieranne neoadjuvantfolfox4versusfolfox4withcetuximabversusimmediatesurgeryforhighriskstageiiandiiicoloncancersamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphaseiitrialtheprodige22eckinoxetrial
AT lucianialain neoadjuvantfolfox4versusfolfox4withcetuximabversusimmediatesurgeryforhighriskstageiiandiiicoloncancersamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphaseiitrialtheprodige22eckinoxetrial
AT bonnetainfranck neoadjuvantfolfox4versusfolfox4withcetuximabversusimmediatesurgeryforhighriskstageiiandiiicoloncancersamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphaseiitrialtheprodige22eckinoxetrial
AT auriaultmarieluce neoadjuvantfolfox4versusfolfox4withcetuximabversusimmediatesurgeryforhighriskstageiiandiiicoloncancersamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphaseiitrialtheprodige22eckinoxetrial
AT sarranantony neoadjuvantfolfox4versusfolfox4withcetuximabversusimmediatesurgeryforhighriskstageiiandiiicoloncancersamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphaseiitrialtheprodige22eckinoxetrial
AT mongesgenevieve neoadjuvantfolfox4versusfolfox4withcetuximabversusimmediatesurgeryforhighriskstageiiandiiicoloncancersamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphaseiitrialtheprodige22eckinoxetrial
AT trillaudherve neoadjuvantfolfox4versusfolfox4withcetuximabversusimmediatesurgeryforhighriskstageiiandiiicoloncancersamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphaseiitrialtheprodige22eckinoxetrial
AT lemalicotkarine neoadjuvantfolfox4versusfolfox4withcetuximabversusimmediatesurgeryforhighriskstageiiandiiicoloncancersamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphaseiitrialtheprodige22eckinoxetrial
AT leroykaren neoadjuvantfolfox4versusfolfox4withcetuximabversusimmediatesurgeryforhighriskstageiiandiiicoloncancersamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphaseiitrialtheprodige22eckinoxetrial
AT sobhaniiradj neoadjuvantfolfox4versusfolfox4withcetuximabversusimmediatesurgeryforhighriskstageiiandiiicoloncancersamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphaseiitrialtheprodige22eckinoxetrial
AT bardierarmelle neoadjuvantfolfox4versusfolfox4withcetuximabversusimmediatesurgeryforhighriskstageiiandiiicoloncancersamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphaseiitrialtheprodige22eckinoxetrial
AT moreaumarie neoadjuvantfolfox4versusfolfox4withcetuximabversusimmediatesurgeryforhighriskstageiiandiiicoloncancersamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphaseiitrialtheprodige22eckinoxetrial
AT brindelisabelle neoadjuvantfolfox4versusfolfox4withcetuximabversusimmediatesurgeryforhighriskstageiiandiiicoloncancersamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphaseiitrialtheprodige22eckinoxetrial
AT seitzjeanfrancois neoadjuvantfolfox4versusfolfox4withcetuximabversusimmediatesurgeryforhighriskstageiiandiiicoloncancersamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphaseiitrialtheprodige22eckinoxetrial
AT taiebjulien neoadjuvantfolfox4versusfolfox4withcetuximabversusimmediatesurgeryforhighriskstageiiandiiicoloncancersamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphaseiitrialtheprodige22eckinoxetrial