Cargando…

Biofilm Formation As a Response to Ecological Competition

Bacteria form dense surface-associated communities known as biofilms that are central to their persistence and how they affect us. Biofilm formation is commonly viewed as a cooperative enterprise, where strains and species work together for a common goal. Here we explore an alternative model: biofil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliveira, Nuno M., Martinez-Garcia, Esteban, Xavier, Joao, Durham, William M., Kolter, Roberto, Kim, Wook, Foster, Kevin R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4497666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26158271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002191
_version_ 1782380540299575296
author Oliveira, Nuno M.
Martinez-Garcia, Esteban
Xavier, Joao
Durham, William M.
Kolter, Roberto
Kim, Wook
Foster, Kevin R.
author_facet Oliveira, Nuno M.
Martinez-Garcia, Esteban
Xavier, Joao
Durham, William M.
Kolter, Roberto
Kim, Wook
Foster, Kevin R.
author_sort Oliveira, Nuno M.
collection PubMed
description Bacteria form dense surface-associated communities known as biofilms that are central to their persistence and how they affect us. Biofilm formation is commonly viewed as a cooperative enterprise, where strains and species work together for a common goal. Here we explore an alternative model: biofilm formation is a response to ecological competition. We co-cultured a diverse collection of natural isolates of the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa and studied the effect on biofilm formation. We show that strain mixing reliably increases biofilm formation compared to unmixed conditions. Importantly, strain mixing leads to strong competition: one strain dominates and largely excludes the other from the biofilm. Furthermore, we show that pyocins, narrow-spectrum antibiotics made by other P. aeruginosa strains, can stimulate biofilm formation by increasing the attachment of cells. Side-by-side comparisons using microfluidic assays suggest that the increase in biofilm occurs due to a general response to cellular damage: a comparable biofilm response occurs for pyocins that disrupt membranes as for commercial antibiotics that damage DNA, inhibit protein synthesis or transcription. Our data show that bacteria increase biofilm formation in response to ecological competition that is detected by antibiotic stress. This is inconsistent with the idea that sub-lethal concentrations of antibiotics are cooperative signals that coordinate microbial communities, as is often concluded. Instead, our work is consistent with competition sensing where low-levels of antibiotics are used to detect and respond to the competing genotypes that produce them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4497666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44976662015-07-14 Biofilm Formation As a Response to Ecological Competition Oliveira, Nuno M. Martinez-Garcia, Esteban Xavier, Joao Durham, William M. Kolter, Roberto Kim, Wook Foster, Kevin R. PLoS Biol Research Article Bacteria form dense surface-associated communities known as biofilms that are central to their persistence and how they affect us. Biofilm formation is commonly viewed as a cooperative enterprise, where strains and species work together for a common goal. Here we explore an alternative model: biofilm formation is a response to ecological competition. We co-cultured a diverse collection of natural isolates of the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa and studied the effect on biofilm formation. We show that strain mixing reliably increases biofilm formation compared to unmixed conditions. Importantly, strain mixing leads to strong competition: one strain dominates and largely excludes the other from the biofilm. Furthermore, we show that pyocins, narrow-spectrum antibiotics made by other P. aeruginosa strains, can stimulate biofilm formation by increasing the attachment of cells. Side-by-side comparisons using microfluidic assays suggest that the increase in biofilm occurs due to a general response to cellular damage: a comparable biofilm response occurs for pyocins that disrupt membranes as for commercial antibiotics that damage DNA, inhibit protein synthesis or transcription. Our data show that bacteria increase biofilm formation in response to ecological competition that is detected by antibiotic stress. This is inconsistent with the idea that sub-lethal concentrations of antibiotics are cooperative signals that coordinate microbial communities, as is often concluded. Instead, our work is consistent with competition sensing where low-levels of antibiotics are used to detect and respond to the competing genotypes that produce them. Public Library of Science 2015-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4497666/ /pubmed/26158271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002191 Text en © 2015 Oliveira et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Oliveira, Nuno M.
Martinez-Garcia, Esteban
Xavier, Joao
Durham, William M.
Kolter, Roberto
Kim, Wook
Foster, Kevin R.
Biofilm Formation As a Response to Ecological Competition
title Biofilm Formation As a Response to Ecological Competition
title_full Biofilm Formation As a Response to Ecological Competition
title_fullStr Biofilm Formation As a Response to Ecological Competition
title_full_unstemmed Biofilm Formation As a Response to Ecological Competition
title_short Biofilm Formation As a Response to Ecological Competition
title_sort biofilm formation as a response to ecological competition
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4497666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26158271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002191
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveiranunom biofilmformationasaresponsetoecologicalcompetition
AT martinezgarciaesteban biofilmformationasaresponsetoecologicalcompetition
AT xavierjoao biofilmformationasaresponsetoecologicalcompetition
AT durhamwilliamm biofilmformationasaresponsetoecologicalcompetition
AT kolterroberto biofilmformationasaresponsetoecologicalcompetition
AT kimwook biofilmformationasaresponsetoecologicalcompetition
AT fosterkevinr biofilmformationasaresponsetoecologicalcompetition