Cargando…

Cryopreservation of In Vitro-Produced Early-Stage Porcine Embryos in a Closed System

Cryostorage of porcine embryos in a closed pathogen-free system is essential for the maintenance and safeguard of swine models. Previously, we reported a protocol for the successful cryopreservation of porcine embryos at the blastocyst stage in 0.25 mL ministraws. In this experiment, we aimed at dev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Men, Hongsheng, Spate, Lee D., Murphy, Clifton N., Prather, Randall S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4497712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26309801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/biores.2015.0012
_version_ 1782380545801453568
author Men, Hongsheng
Spate, Lee D.
Murphy, Clifton N.
Prather, Randall S.
author_facet Men, Hongsheng
Spate, Lee D.
Murphy, Clifton N.
Prather, Randall S.
author_sort Men, Hongsheng
collection PubMed
description Cryostorage of porcine embryos in a closed pathogen-free system is essential for the maintenance and safeguard of swine models. Previously, we reported a protocol for the successful cryopreservation of porcine embryos at the blastocyst stage in 0.25 mL ministraws. In this experiment, we aimed at developing a protocol to apply the same concept for the cryopreservation of early-stage porcine embryos. Porcine embryos from day 2 through day 4 were delipidated by using a modified two-step centrifugation method and were then cryopreserved in sealed 0.25 mL straws by using a slow cooling method. Control groups included open pulled straw (OPS) vitrified embryos after delipidation and noncryopreserved embryos without delipidation. There were no significant differences in cryosurvival between embryos frozen in 0.25 mL straws and OPS vitrified embryos across all the stages (two cell to morula) examined (p>0.05). Similarly, in all groups examined, the blastocyst rates were not different between the two cryopreserved groups. However, the blastocyst rates from the cryopreserved groups were significantly lower than the noncryopreserved controls (p<0.05). This experiment demonstrated that early-stage porcine embryos can survive cryopreservation in a closed system by using a slow cooling method at a comparable rate to those vitrified by using an ultrarapid cooling method (p>0.05). However, the developmental competence was significantly reduced after cryopreservation compared to noncryopreserved embryos. Further research is needed to optimize the protocol to improve the developmental potential of cryopreserved early-stage porcine embryos in sealed straws.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4497712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44977122015-08-25 Cryopreservation of In Vitro-Produced Early-Stage Porcine Embryos in a Closed System Men, Hongsheng Spate, Lee D. Murphy, Clifton N. Prather, Randall S. Biores Open Access Original Research Article Cryostorage of porcine embryos in a closed pathogen-free system is essential for the maintenance and safeguard of swine models. Previously, we reported a protocol for the successful cryopreservation of porcine embryos at the blastocyst stage in 0.25 mL ministraws. In this experiment, we aimed at developing a protocol to apply the same concept for the cryopreservation of early-stage porcine embryos. Porcine embryos from day 2 through day 4 were delipidated by using a modified two-step centrifugation method and were then cryopreserved in sealed 0.25 mL straws by using a slow cooling method. Control groups included open pulled straw (OPS) vitrified embryos after delipidation and noncryopreserved embryos without delipidation. There were no significant differences in cryosurvival between embryos frozen in 0.25 mL straws and OPS vitrified embryos across all the stages (two cell to morula) examined (p>0.05). Similarly, in all groups examined, the blastocyst rates were not different between the two cryopreserved groups. However, the blastocyst rates from the cryopreserved groups were significantly lower than the noncryopreserved controls (p<0.05). This experiment demonstrated that early-stage porcine embryos can survive cryopreservation in a closed system by using a slow cooling method at a comparable rate to those vitrified by using an ultrarapid cooling method (p>0.05). However, the developmental competence was significantly reduced after cryopreservation compared to noncryopreserved embryos. Further research is needed to optimize the protocol to improve the developmental potential of cryopreserved early-stage porcine embryos in sealed straws. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2015-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4497712/ /pubmed/26309801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/biores.2015.0012 Text en © Hongsheng Men et al. 2015; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Men, Hongsheng
Spate, Lee D.
Murphy, Clifton N.
Prather, Randall S.
Cryopreservation of In Vitro-Produced Early-Stage Porcine Embryos in a Closed System
title Cryopreservation of In Vitro-Produced Early-Stage Porcine Embryos in a Closed System
title_full Cryopreservation of In Vitro-Produced Early-Stage Porcine Embryos in a Closed System
title_fullStr Cryopreservation of In Vitro-Produced Early-Stage Porcine Embryos in a Closed System
title_full_unstemmed Cryopreservation of In Vitro-Produced Early-Stage Porcine Embryos in a Closed System
title_short Cryopreservation of In Vitro-Produced Early-Stage Porcine Embryos in a Closed System
title_sort cryopreservation of in vitro-produced early-stage porcine embryos in a closed system
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4497712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26309801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/biores.2015.0012
work_keys_str_mv AT menhongsheng cryopreservationofinvitroproducedearlystageporcineembryosinaclosedsystem
AT spateleed cryopreservationofinvitroproducedearlystageporcineembryosinaclosedsystem
AT murphycliftonn cryopreservationofinvitroproducedearlystageporcineembryosinaclosedsystem
AT pratherrandalls cryopreservationofinvitroproducedearlystageporcineembryosinaclosedsystem