Cargando…

A decision support system (GesCoN) for managing fertigation in vegetable crops. Part II—model calibration and validation under different environmental growing conditions on field grown tomato

The GesCoN model was evaluated for its capability to simulate growth, nitrogen uptake, and productivity of open field tomato grown under different environmental and cultural conditions. Five datasets collected from experimental trials carried out in Foggia (IT) were used for calibration and 13 datas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conversa, Giulia, Bonasia, Anna, Di Gioia, Francesco, Elia, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26217351
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00495
_version_ 1782380568114102272
author Conversa, Giulia
Bonasia, Anna
Di Gioia, Francesco
Elia, Antonio
author_facet Conversa, Giulia
Bonasia, Anna
Di Gioia, Francesco
Elia, Antonio
author_sort Conversa, Giulia
collection PubMed
description The GesCoN model was evaluated for its capability to simulate growth, nitrogen uptake, and productivity of open field tomato grown under different environmental and cultural conditions. Five datasets collected from experimental trials carried out in Foggia (IT) were used for calibration and 13 datasets collected from trials conducted in Foggia, Perugia (IT), and Florida (USA) were used for validation. The goodness of fitting was performed by comparing the observed and simulated shoot dry weight (SDW) and N crop uptake during crop seasons, total dry weight (TDW), N uptake and fresh yield (TFY). In SDW model calibration, the relative RMSE values fell within the good 10–15% range, percent BIAS (PBIAS) ranged between −11.5 and 7.4%. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) was very close to the optimal value 1. In the N uptake calibration RRMSE and PBIAS were very low (7%, and −1.78, respectively) and NSE close to 1. The validation of SDW (RRMSE = 16.7%; NSE = 0.96) and N uptake (RRMSE = 16.8%; NSE = 0.96) showed the good accuracy of GesCoN. A model under- or overestimation of the SDW and N uptake occurred when higher or a lower N rates and/or a more or less efficient system were used compared to the calibration trial. The in-season adjustment, using the “SDWcheck” procedure, greatly improved model simulations both in the calibration and in the validation phases. The TFY prediction was quite good except in Florida, where a large overestimation (+16%) was linked to a different harvest index (0.53) compared to the cultivars used for model calibration and validation in Italian areas. The soil water content at the 10–30 cm depth appears to be well-simulated by the software, and the GesCoN proved to be able to adaptively control potential yield and DW accumulation under limited N soil availability scenarios and consequently to modify fertilizer application. The DSSwell simulate SDW accumulation and N uptake of different tomato genotypes grown under Mediterranean and subtropical conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4498037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44980372015-07-27 A decision support system (GesCoN) for managing fertigation in vegetable crops. Part II—model calibration and validation under different environmental growing conditions on field grown tomato Conversa, Giulia Bonasia, Anna Di Gioia, Francesco Elia, Antonio Front Plant Sci Plant Science The GesCoN model was evaluated for its capability to simulate growth, nitrogen uptake, and productivity of open field tomato grown under different environmental and cultural conditions. Five datasets collected from experimental trials carried out in Foggia (IT) were used for calibration and 13 datasets collected from trials conducted in Foggia, Perugia (IT), and Florida (USA) were used for validation. The goodness of fitting was performed by comparing the observed and simulated shoot dry weight (SDW) and N crop uptake during crop seasons, total dry weight (TDW), N uptake and fresh yield (TFY). In SDW model calibration, the relative RMSE values fell within the good 10–15% range, percent BIAS (PBIAS) ranged between −11.5 and 7.4%. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) was very close to the optimal value 1. In the N uptake calibration RRMSE and PBIAS were very low (7%, and −1.78, respectively) and NSE close to 1. The validation of SDW (RRMSE = 16.7%; NSE = 0.96) and N uptake (RRMSE = 16.8%; NSE = 0.96) showed the good accuracy of GesCoN. A model under- or overestimation of the SDW and N uptake occurred when higher or a lower N rates and/or a more or less efficient system were used compared to the calibration trial. The in-season adjustment, using the “SDWcheck” procedure, greatly improved model simulations both in the calibration and in the validation phases. The TFY prediction was quite good except in Florida, where a large overestimation (+16%) was linked to a different harvest index (0.53) compared to the cultivars used for model calibration and validation in Italian areas. The soil water content at the 10–30 cm depth appears to be well-simulated by the software, and the GesCoN proved to be able to adaptively control potential yield and DW accumulation under limited N soil availability scenarios and consequently to modify fertilizer application. The DSSwell simulate SDW accumulation and N uptake of different tomato genotypes grown under Mediterranean and subtropical conditions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4498037/ /pubmed/26217351 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00495 Text en Copyright © 2015 Conversa, Bonasia, Di Gioia and Elia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Conversa, Giulia
Bonasia, Anna
Di Gioia, Francesco
Elia, Antonio
A decision support system (GesCoN) for managing fertigation in vegetable crops. Part II—model calibration and validation under different environmental growing conditions on field grown tomato
title A decision support system (GesCoN) for managing fertigation in vegetable crops. Part II—model calibration and validation under different environmental growing conditions on field grown tomato
title_full A decision support system (GesCoN) for managing fertigation in vegetable crops. Part II—model calibration and validation under different environmental growing conditions on field grown tomato
title_fullStr A decision support system (GesCoN) for managing fertigation in vegetable crops. Part II—model calibration and validation under different environmental growing conditions on field grown tomato
title_full_unstemmed A decision support system (GesCoN) for managing fertigation in vegetable crops. Part II—model calibration and validation under different environmental growing conditions on field grown tomato
title_short A decision support system (GesCoN) for managing fertigation in vegetable crops. Part II—model calibration and validation under different environmental growing conditions on field grown tomato
title_sort decision support system (gescon) for managing fertigation in vegetable crops. part ii—model calibration and validation under different environmental growing conditions on field grown tomato
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26217351
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00495
work_keys_str_mv AT conversagiulia adecisionsupportsystemgesconformanagingfertigationinvegetablecropspartiimodelcalibrationandvalidationunderdifferentenvironmentalgrowingconditionsonfieldgrowntomato
AT bonasiaanna adecisionsupportsystemgesconformanagingfertigationinvegetablecropspartiimodelcalibrationandvalidationunderdifferentenvironmentalgrowingconditionsonfieldgrowntomato
AT digioiafrancesco adecisionsupportsystemgesconformanagingfertigationinvegetablecropspartiimodelcalibrationandvalidationunderdifferentenvironmentalgrowingconditionsonfieldgrowntomato
AT eliaantonio adecisionsupportsystemgesconformanagingfertigationinvegetablecropspartiimodelcalibrationandvalidationunderdifferentenvironmentalgrowingconditionsonfieldgrowntomato
AT conversagiulia decisionsupportsystemgesconformanagingfertigationinvegetablecropspartiimodelcalibrationandvalidationunderdifferentenvironmentalgrowingconditionsonfieldgrowntomato
AT bonasiaanna decisionsupportsystemgesconformanagingfertigationinvegetablecropspartiimodelcalibrationandvalidationunderdifferentenvironmentalgrowingconditionsonfieldgrowntomato
AT digioiafrancesco decisionsupportsystemgesconformanagingfertigationinvegetablecropspartiimodelcalibrationandvalidationunderdifferentenvironmentalgrowingconditionsonfieldgrowntomato
AT eliaantonio decisionsupportsystemgesconformanagingfertigationinvegetablecropspartiimodelcalibrationandvalidationunderdifferentenvironmentalgrowingconditionsonfieldgrowntomato