Cargando…

Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect?

Objective: Surgery remains the mainstay in the diagnosis and management of endometriosis. The number of surgeries performed for endometriosis worldwide is ever increasing, however do we have evidence for improvement of infertility after the surgery and do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect of sur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rizk, B., Turki, R., Lotfy, H., Ranganathan, S., Zahed, H., Freeman, A.R., Shilbayeh, Z., Sassy, M., Shalaby, M., Malik, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universa Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177374
_version_ 1782380580565942272
author Rizk, B.
Turki, R.
Lotfy, H.
Ranganathan, S.
Zahed, H.
Freeman, A.R.
Shilbayeh, Z.
Sassy, M.
Shalaby, M.
Malik, R.
author_facet Rizk, B.
Turki, R.
Lotfy, H.
Ranganathan, S.
Zahed, H.
Freeman, A.R.
Shilbayeh, Z.
Sassy, M.
Shalaby, M.
Malik, R.
author_sort Rizk, B.
collection PubMed
description Objective: Surgery remains the mainstay in the diagnosis and management of endometriosis. The number of surgeries performed for endometriosis worldwide is ever increasing, however do we have evidence for improvement of infertility after the surgery and do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect of surgery when we counsel our patients? The management of patients who failed the surgery could be by repeat surgery or assisted reproduction. What evidence do we have for patients who fail assisted reproduction and what is their best chance for achieving pregnancy? Material and methods: In this study we reviewed the evidence-based practice pertaining to the outcome of surgery assisted infertility associated with endometriosis. Manuscripts published in PubMed and Science Direct as well as the bibliography cited in these articles were reviewed. Patients with peritoneal endometriosis with mild and severe disease were addressed separately. Patients who failed the primary surgery and managed by repeat or assisted reproduction technology were also evaluated. Patients who failed assisted reproduction and managed by surgery were also studied to determine of the best course of action. Results: In patients with minimal and mild pelvic endometriosis, excision or ablation of the peritoneal endometriosis increases the pregnancy rate. In women with severe endometriosis, controlled trials suggested an improvement of pregnancy rate. In women with ovarian endometrioma 4 cm or larger ovarian cystectomy increases the pregnancy rate, decreases the recurrence rate, but is associated with decrease in ovarian reserve. In patients who have failed the primary surgery, assisted reproduction appears to be significantly more effective than repeat surgery. In patients who failed assisted reproduction, the management remains to be extremely controversial. Surgery in expert hands might result in significant improvement in pregnancy rate. Conclusion: In women with minimal and mild endometriosis, surgical excision or ablation of endometriosis is recommended as first line with doubling the pregnancy rate. In patients with moderate and severe endometriosis surgical excision also is recommended as first line. In patients who failed to conceive spontaneously after surgery, assisted reproduction is more effective than repeat surgery. Following surgery, the ovarian reserve may be reduced as determined by Anti Mullerian Hormone. The antral follicle count is not significantly reduced. In women with large endometriomas > 4 cm the ovarian endometrioma should be removed. In women who have failed assisted reproduction, further management remains controversial in the present time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4498168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Universa Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44981682015-07-14 Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect? Rizk, B. Turki, R. Lotfy, H. Ranganathan, S. Zahed, H. Freeman, A.R. Shilbayeh, Z. Sassy, M. Shalaby, M. Malik, R. Facts Views Vis Obgyn Review Objective: Surgery remains the mainstay in the diagnosis and management of endometriosis. The number of surgeries performed for endometriosis worldwide is ever increasing, however do we have evidence for improvement of infertility after the surgery and do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect of surgery when we counsel our patients? The management of patients who failed the surgery could be by repeat surgery or assisted reproduction. What evidence do we have for patients who fail assisted reproduction and what is their best chance for achieving pregnancy? Material and methods: In this study we reviewed the evidence-based practice pertaining to the outcome of surgery assisted infertility associated with endometriosis. Manuscripts published in PubMed and Science Direct as well as the bibliography cited in these articles were reviewed. Patients with peritoneal endometriosis with mild and severe disease were addressed separately. Patients who failed the primary surgery and managed by repeat or assisted reproduction technology were also evaluated. Patients who failed assisted reproduction and managed by surgery were also studied to determine of the best course of action. Results: In patients with minimal and mild pelvic endometriosis, excision or ablation of the peritoneal endometriosis increases the pregnancy rate. In women with severe endometriosis, controlled trials suggested an improvement of pregnancy rate. In women with ovarian endometrioma 4 cm or larger ovarian cystectomy increases the pregnancy rate, decreases the recurrence rate, but is associated with decrease in ovarian reserve. In patients who have failed the primary surgery, assisted reproduction appears to be significantly more effective than repeat surgery. In patients who failed assisted reproduction, the management remains to be extremely controversial. Surgery in expert hands might result in significant improvement in pregnancy rate. Conclusion: In women with minimal and mild endometriosis, surgical excision or ablation of endometriosis is recommended as first line with doubling the pregnancy rate. In patients with moderate and severe endometriosis surgical excision also is recommended as first line. In patients who failed to conceive spontaneously after surgery, assisted reproduction is more effective than repeat surgery. Following surgery, the ovarian reserve may be reduced as determined by Anti Mullerian Hormone. The antral follicle count is not significantly reduced. In women with large endometriomas > 4 cm the ovarian endometrioma should be removed. In women who have failed assisted reproduction, further management remains controversial in the present time. Universa Press 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4498168/ /pubmed/26177374 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Facts, Views & Vision http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Rizk, B.
Turki, R.
Lotfy, H.
Ranganathan, S.
Zahed, H.
Freeman, A.R.
Shilbayeh, Z.
Sassy, M.
Shalaby, M.
Malik, R.
Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect?
title Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect?
title_full Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect?
title_fullStr Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect?
title_full_unstemmed Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect?
title_short Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect?
title_sort surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177374
work_keys_str_mv AT rizkb surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect
AT turkir surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect
AT lotfyh surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect
AT ranganathans surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect
AT zahedh surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect
AT freemanar surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect
AT shilbayehz surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect
AT sassym surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect
AT shalabym surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect
AT malikr surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect