Cargando…
Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect?
Objective: Surgery remains the mainstay in the diagnosis and management of endometriosis. The number of surgeries performed for endometriosis worldwide is ever increasing, however do we have evidence for improvement of infertility after the surgery and do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect of sur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Universa Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177374 |
_version_ | 1782380580565942272 |
---|---|
author | Rizk, B. Turki, R. Lotfy, H. Ranganathan, S. Zahed, H. Freeman, A.R. Shilbayeh, Z. Sassy, M. Shalaby, M. Malik, R. |
author_facet | Rizk, B. Turki, R. Lotfy, H. Ranganathan, S. Zahed, H. Freeman, A.R. Shilbayeh, Z. Sassy, M. Shalaby, M. Malik, R. |
author_sort | Rizk, B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Surgery remains the mainstay in the diagnosis and management of endometriosis. The number of surgeries performed for endometriosis worldwide is ever increasing, however do we have evidence for improvement of infertility after the surgery and do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect of surgery when we counsel our patients? The management of patients who failed the surgery could be by repeat surgery or assisted reproduction. What evidence do we have for patients who fail assisted reproduction and what is their best chance for achieving pregnancy? Material and methods: In this study we reviewed the evidence-based practice pertaining to the outcome of surgery assisted infertility associated with endometriosis. Manuscripts published in PubMed and Science Direct as well as the bibliography cited in these articles were reviewed. Patients with peritoneal endometriosis with mild and severe disease were addressed separately. Patients who failed the primary surgery and managed by repeat or assisted reproduction technology were also evaluated. Patients who failed assisted reproduction and managed by surgery were also studied to determine of the best course of action. Results: In patients with minimal and mild pelvic endometriosis, excision or ablation of the peritoneal endometriosis increases the pregnancy rate. In women with severe endometriosis, controlled trials suggested an improvement of pregnancy rate. In women with ovarian endometrioma 4 cm or larger ovarian cystectomy increases the pregnancy rate, decreases the recurrence rate, but is associated with decrease in ovarian reserve. In patients who have failed the primary surgery, assisted reproduction appears to be significantly more effective than repeat surgery. In patients who failed assisted reproduction, the management remains to be extremely controversial. Surgery in expert hands might result in significant improvement in pregnancy rate. Conclusion: In women with minimal and mild endometriosis, surgical excision or ablation of endometriosis is recommended as first line with doubling the pregnancy rate. In patients with moderate and severe endometriosis surgical excision also is recommended as first line. In patients who failed to conceive spontaneously after surgery, assisted reproduction is more effective than repeat surgery. Following surgery, the ovarian reserve may be reduced as determined by Anti Mullerian Hormone. The antral follicle count is not significantly reduced. In women with large endometriomas > 4 cm the ovarian endometrioma should be removed. In women who have failed assisted reproduction, further management remains controversial in the present time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4498168 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Universa Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44981682015-07-14 Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect? Rizk, B. Turki, R. Lotfy, H. Ranganathan, S. Zahed, H. Freeman, A.R. Shilbayeh, Z. Sassy, M. Shalaby, M. Malik, R. Facts Views Vis Obgyn Review Objective: Surgery remains the mainstay in the diagnosis and management of endometriosis. The number of surgeries performed for endometriosis worldwide is ever increasing, however do we have evidence for improvement of infertility after the surgery and do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect of surgery when we counsel our patients? The management of patients who failed the surgery could be by repeat surgery or assisted reproduction. What evidence do we have for patients who fail assisted reproduction and what is their best chance for achieving pregnancy? Material and methods: In this study we reviewed the evidence-based practice pertaining to the outcome of surgery assisted infertility associated with endometriosis. Manuscripts published in PubMed and Science Direct as well as the bibliography cited in these articles were reviewed. Patients with peritoneal endometriosis with mild and severe disease were addressed separately. Patients who failed the primary surgery and managed by repeat or assisted reproduction technology were also evaluated. Patients who failed assisted reproduction and managed by surgery were also studied to determine of the best course of action. Results: In patients with minimal and mild pelvic endometriosis, excision or ablation of the peritoneal endometriosis increases the pregnancy rate. In women with severe endometriosis, controlled trials suggested an improvement of pregnancy rate. In women with ovarian endometrioma 4 cm or larger ovarian cystectomy increases the pregnancy rate, decreases the recurrence rate, but is associated with decrease in ovarian reserve. In patients who have failed the primary surgery, assisted reproduction appears to be significantly more effective than repeat surgery. In patients who failed assisted reproduction, the management remains to be extremely controversial. Surgery in expert hands might result in significant improvement in pregnancy rate. Conclusion: In women with minimal and mild endometriosis, surgical excision or ablation of endometriosis is recommended as first line with doubling the pregnancy rate. In patients with moderate and severe endometriosis surgical excision also is recommended as first line. In patients who failed to conceive spontaneously after surgery, assisted reproduction is more effective than repeat surgery. Following surgery, the ovarian reserve may be reduced as determined by Anti Mullerian Hormone. The antral follicle count is not significantly reduced. In women with large endometriomas > 4 cm the ovarian endometrioma should be removed. In women who have failed assisted reproduction, further management remains controversial in the present time. Universa Press 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4498168/ /pubmed/26177374 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Facts, Views & Vision http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Rizk, B. Turki, R. Lotfy, H. Ranganathan, S. Zahed, H. Freeman, A.R. Shilbayeh, Z. Sassy, M. Shalaby, M. Malik, R. Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect? |
title | Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect? |
title_full | Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect? |
title_fullStr | Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect? |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect? |
title_short | Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect? |
title_sort | surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: do we exaggerate the magnitude of effect? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177374 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rizkb surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect AT turkir surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect AT lotfyh surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect AT ranganathans surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect AT zahedh surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect AT freemanar surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect AT shilbayehz surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect AT sassym surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect AT shalabym surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect AT malikr surgeryforendometriosisassociatedinfertilitydoweexaggeratethemagnitudeofeffect |