Cargando…

Methodological quality of meta-analyses on treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study using the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) tool

BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis (MA) of randomised trials is considered to be one of the best approaches for summarising high-quality evidence on the efficacy and safety of treatments. However, methodological flaws in MAs can reduce the validity of conclusions, subsequently impairing the quality of decisi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ho, Robin ST, Wu, Xinyin, Yuan, Jinqiu, Liu, Siya, Lai, Xin, Wong, Samuel YS, Chung, Vincent CH
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:	Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25569783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.102

Ejemplares similares

Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
por: Dosenovic, Svjetlana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
por: Shea, Beverley J, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

A Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analysis Studies in Dance Therapy Using AMSTAR and AMSTAR 2
por: Kim, Hye-Ryeon, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
por: Pollock, Michelle, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

157: ASSESSING THE METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (DSS) SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS BY AMSTAR CHECKLIST
por: Sadeghi-Ghyassi, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of antidepressants effect on low back pain using updated AMSTAR
por: Panahi, Mohammad Hossein, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome using AMSTAR2
por: Guan, Xin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Use of AMSTAR-2 in the methodological assessment of systematic reviews: protocol for a methodological study
por: Lu, Cuncun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Reporting and methodologic evaluation of meta-analyses published in the anesthesia literature according to AMSTAR and PRISMA checklists: a preliminary study
por: Oh, Jae Hoon, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS)
por: SEQUEIRA-BYRON, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study
por: Matthias, Katja, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses About Breast Augmentation Using AMSTAR
por: Yuan, Morgan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Commentary on: Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses About Breast Augmentation Using AMSTAR
por: Gould, Daniel J
Publicado: (2021)

Chinese Herbal Medicine and Salmeterol and Fluticasone Propionate for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
por: Chung, Vincent C.H., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Methodological quality of systematic reviews on Chinese herbal medicine: a methodological survey
por: Cheung, Andy K. L., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

What editors, reviewers, researchers and librarians need to know about the PRESS, MECIR, PRISMA and AMSTAR instruments with regard to improving the methodological quality of searches for information for articles
por: Puga, Maria Eduarda dos Santos
Publicado: (2020)

Methodological quality of systematic reviews on interventions for osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study
por: Wu, Irene XY, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Reporting and methodological quality of meta-analyses in urological literature
por: Xia, Leilei, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews
por: Kang, Deying, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicine for cancer palliative care: overview of systematic reviews with meta-analyses
por: Chung, Vincent CH, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

An overview of systematic reviews of complementary and alternative therapies for fibromyalgia using both AMSTAR and ROBIS as quality assessment tools
por: Perry, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines
por: Kelly, Shannon E, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Vignette Research Methodology: An Essential Tool for Quality Improvement Collaboratives
por: Payton, Kurlen S. E., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Patients’ experience of Chinese Medicine Primary Care Services: Implications on Improving Coordination and Continuity of Care
por: Chung, Vincent CH, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Assessing the methodological and reporting quality of network meta-analyses in Chinese medicine
por: Yang, Fengwen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses of nursing interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ‐ A systematic review
por: Sun, Xiao, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Abstract: Assessing Quality in Systematic Reviews: Application of AMSTAR Criteria to Plastic Surgery Literature
por: Jenny, Hillary E., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR
por: Wu, Xinyu, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)
por: Shea, Beverley J., et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study
por: Gates, Allison, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Systematic Review and Quality Appraisal of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Pharmacologic Maintenance Treatment for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Methodological Considerations and Recommendations
por: van der Schans, Simon, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

An Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Published Network Meta-Analyses: A Systematic Review
por: Chambers, James D., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Therapies of varicose veins: Protocol for the reporting and methodological quality of pairwise meta-analyses
por: Ding, Jie, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement
por: Burda, Brittany U., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study
por: Ho, Leonard, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews
por: Welsh, Emma J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Editorial: Methodological Quality of Interventions in Psychology
por: Chacón-Moscoso, Salvador, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Correction: An Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Published Network Meta-Analyses: A Systematic Review
por: Chambers, James D., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The quality of subgroup analyses in chronic pain randomized controlled trials: a methodological review
por: AminiLari, Mahmood, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Methodological Quality Assessment of Budget Impact Analyses for Orphan Drugs: A Systematic Review
por: Abdallah, Khadidja, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_hdf21oln1mv0097ld4b2mvb4gr