Cargando…

SMT19969 for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI): in vivo efficacy compared with fidaxomicin and vancomycin in the hamster model of CDI

OBJECTIVES: SMT19969 is a novel narrow-spectrum antimicrobial under development for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). The objectives were to assess the relative efficacies of SMT19969, vancomycin and fidaxomicin in the hamster model of CDI. METHODS: Hamsters were infected with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sattar, Abdul, Thommes, Pia, Payne, Lloyd, Warn, Peter, Vickers, Richard J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25652749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkv005
_version_ 1782380599545167872
author Sattar, Abdul
Thommes, Pia
Payne, Lloyd
Warn, Peter
Vickers, Richard J.
author_facet Sattar, Abdul
Thommes, Pia
Payne, Lloyd
Warn, Peter
Vickers, Richard J.
author_sort Sattar, Abdul
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: SMT19969 is a novel narrow-spectrum antimicrobial under development for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). The objectives were to assess the relative efficacies of SMT19969, vancomycin and fidaxomicin in the hamster model of CDI. METHODS: Hamsters were infected with either C. difficile BI1 (ribotype 027) or C. difficile 630 (ribotype 012) prior to treatment with vehicle, SMT19969, fidaxomicin or vancomycin for 5 days. Animals were further monitored through to day 28 and survival recorded. Plasma and gastrointestinal concentrations of SMT19969 following single and repeat administration in infected hamsters were determined. RESULTS: Following infection with C. difficile BI1, treatment with SMT19969, vancomycin and fidaxomicin resulted in 100% survival during the 5 day dosing period, with 90%–100% of animals receiving SMT19969 and fidaxomicin surviving during the post-dosing follow-up period. Whilst protective during treatment, onset of mortality was observed on day 11 in animals treated with vancomycin, with a 10% survival recorded by day 28. Similar results were observed for SMT19969 and vancomycin following infection with C. difficile 630, with day 28 survival rates of 80%–100% and 0%, respectively. Fidaxomicin protected animals infected with C. difficile 630 from mortality during dosing, although day 28 survival rates varied from 0% to 40% depending on dose. Plasma levels of SMT19969 were typically below the limit of quantification, but levels in the gastrointestinal tract remained far in excess of the MIC. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that SMT19969 is highly effective at treating both acute infection and preventing recurrent disease and support continued investigation of SMT19969 as a potential therapy for CDI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4498292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44982922015-07-15 SMT19969 for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI): in vivo efficacy compared with fidaxomicin and vancomycin in the hamster model of CDI Sattar, Abdul Thommes, Pia Payne, Lloyd Warn, Peter Vickers, Richard J. J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research OBJECTIVES: SMT19969 is a novel narrow-spectrum antimicrobial under development for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). The objectives were to assess the relative efficacies of SMT19969, vancomycin and fidaxomicin in the hamster model of CDI. METHODS: Hamsters were infected with either C. difficile BI1 (ribotype 027) or C. difficile 630 (ribotype 012) prior to treatment with vehicle, SMT19969, fidaxomicin or vancomycin for 5 days. Animals were further monitored through to day 28 and survival recorded. Plasma and gastrointestinal concentrations of SMT19969 following single and repeat administration in infected hamsters were determined. RESULTS: Following infection with C. difficile BI1, treatment with SMT19969, vancomycin and fidaxomicin resulted in 100% survival during the 5 day dosing period, with 90%–100% of animals receiving SMT19969 and fidaxomicin surviving during the post-dosing follow-up period. Whilst protective during treatment, onset of mortality was observed on day 11 in animals treated with vancomycin, with a 10% survival recorded by day 28. Similar results were observed for SMT19969 and vancomycin following infection with C. difficile 630, with day 28 survival rates of 80%–100% and 0%, respectively. Fidaxomicin protected animals infected with C. difficile 630 from mortality during dosing, although day 28 survival rates varied from 0% to 40% depending on dose. Plasma levels of SMT19969 were typically below the limit of quantification, but levels in the gastrointestinal tract remained far in excess of the MIC. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that SMT19969 is highly effective at treating both acute infection and preventing recurrent disease and support continued investigation of SMT19969 as a potential therapy for CDI. Oxford University Press 2015-06 2015-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4498292/ /pubmed/25652749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkv005 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sattar, Abdul
Thommes, Pia
Payne, Lloyd
Warn, Peter
Vickers, Richard J.
SMT19969 for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI): in vivo efficacy compared with fidaxomicin and vancomycin in the hamster model of CDI
title SMT19969 for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI): in vivo efficacy compared with fidaxomicin and vancomycin in the hamster model of CDI
title_full SMT19969 for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI): in vivo efficacy compared with fidaxomicin and vancomycin in the hamster model of CDI
title_fullStr SMT19969 for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI): in vivo efficacy compared with fidaxomicin and vancomycin in the hamster model of CDI
title_full_unstemmed SMT19969 for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI): in vivo efficacy compared with fidaxomicin and vancomycin in the hamster model of CDI
title_short SMT19969 for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI): in vivo efficacy compared with fidaxomicin and vancomycin in the hamster model of CDI
title_sort smt19969 for clostridium difficile infection (cdi): in vivo efficacy compared with fidaxomicin and vancomycin in the hamster model of cdi
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25652749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkv005
work_keys_str_mv AT sattarabdul smt19969forclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiinvivoefficacycomparedwithfidaxomicinandvancomycininthehamstermodelofcdi
AT thommespia smt19969forclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiinvivoefficacycomparedwithfidaxomicinandvancomycininthehamstermodelofcdi
AT paynelloyd smt19969forclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiinvivoefficacycomparedwithfidaxomicinandvancomycininthehamstermodelofcdi
AT warnpeter smt19969forclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiinvivoefficacycomparedwithfidaxomicinandvancomycininthehamstermodelofcdi
AT vickersrichardj smt19969forclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiinvivoefficacycomparedwithfidaxomicinandvancomycininthehamstermodelofcdi