Cargando…

Detection of Outliers Due to Participants’ Non-Adherence to Protocol in a Longitudinal Study of Cognitive Decline

BACKGROUND: Participants’ non adherence to protocol affects data quality. In longitudinal studies, this leads to outliers that can be present at the level of the population or the individual. The purpose of the present study is to elaborate a method for detection of outliers in a study of cognitive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dugravot, Aline, Sabia, Severine, Shipley, Martin J., Welch, Catherine, Kivimaki, Mika, Singh-Manoux, Archana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26161552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132110
_version_ 1782380659186073600
author Dugravot, Aline
Sabia, Severine
Shipley, Martin J.
Welch, Catherine
Kivimaki, Mika
Singh-Manoux, Archana
author_facet Dugravot, Aline
Sabia, Severine
Shipley, Martin J.
Welch, Catherine
Kivimaki, Mika
Singh-Manoux, Archana
author_sort Dugravot, Aline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Participants’ non adherence to protocol affects data quality. In longitudinal studies, this leads to outliers that can be present at the level of the population or the individual. The purpose of the present study is to elaborate a method for detection of outliers in a study of cognitive ageing. METHODS: In the Whitehall II study, data on a cognitive test battery have been collected in 1997-99, 2002-04, 2007-09 and 2012-13. Outliers at the 2012-13 wave were identified using a 4-step procedure: (1) identify cognitive tests with potential non-adherence to protocol, (2) choose a prediction model between a simple model with socio-demographic covariates and one that also includes health behaviours and health measures, (3) define an outlier using a studentized residual, and (4) study the impact of exclusion of outliers by estimating the effect of age and diabetes on cognitive decline. RESULTS: 5516 participants provided cognitive data in 2012-13. Comparisons of rates of annual decline over the first three and all four waves of data suggested outliers in three of the 5 tests. Mean residuals for the 2012-13 wave were larger for the basic compared to the more complex prediction model (all p<0.001), leading us to use the latter for the identification of outliers. Residuals greater than two standard deviation of residuals identified approximately 7% of observations as being outliers. Removal of these observations from the analyses showed that both age and diabetes had associations with cognitive decline similar to that observed with the first three waves of data; these associations were weaker or absent in non-cleaned data. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of outliers is important as they obscure the effects of known risk factor and introduce bias in the estimates of cognitive decline. We showed that an informed approach, using the range of data collected in a longitudinal study, may be able to identify outliers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4498688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44986882015-07-17 Detection of Outliers Due to Participants’ Non-Adherence to Protocol in a Longitudinal Study of Cognitive Decline Dugravot, Aline Sabia, Severine Shipley, Martin J. Welch, Catherine Kivimaki, Mika Singh-Manoux, Archana PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Participants’ non adherence to protocol affects data quality. In longitudinal studies, this leads to outliers that can be present at the level of the population or the individual. The purpose of the present study is to elaborate a method for detection of outliers in a study of cognitive ageing. METHODS: In the Whitehall II study, data on a cognitive test battery have been collected in 1997-99, 2002-04, 2007-09 and 2012-13. Outliers at the 2012-13 wave were identified using a 4-step procedure: (1) identify cognitive tests with potential non-adherence to protocol, (2) choose a prediction model between a simple model with socio-demographic covariates and one that also includes health behaviours and health measures, (3) define an outlier using a studentized residual, and (4) study the impact of exclusion of outliers by estimating the effect of age and diabetes on cognitive decline. RESULTS: 5516 participants provided cognitive data in 2012-13. Comparisons of rates of annual decline over the first three and all four waves of data suggested outliers in three of the 5 tests. Mean residuals for the 2012-13 wave were larger for the basic compared to the more complex prediction model (all p<0.001), leading us to use the latter for the identification of outliers. Residuals greater than two standard deviation of residuals identified approximately 7% of observations as being outliers. Removal of these observations from the analyses showed that both age and diabetes had associations with cognitive decline similar to that observed with the first three waves of data; these associations were weaker or absent in non-cleaned data. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of outliers is important as they obscure the effects of known risk factor and introduce bias in the estimates of cognitive decline. We showed that an informed approach, using the range of data collected in a longitudinal study, may be able to identify outliers. Public Library of Science 2015-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4498688/ /pubmed/26161552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132110 Text en © 2015 Dugravot et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dugravot, Aline
Sabia, Severine
Shipley, Martin J.
Welch, Catherine
Kivimaki, Mika
Singh-Manoux, Archana
Detection of Outliers Due to Participants’ Non-Adherence to Protocol in a Longitudinal Study of Cognitive Decline
title Detection of Outliers Due to Participants’ Non-Adherence to Protocol in a Longitudinal Study of Cognitive Decline
title_full Detection of Outliers Due to Participants’ Non-Adherence to Protocol in a Longitudinal Study of Cognitive Decline
title_fullStr Detection of Outliers Due to Participants’ Non-Adherence to Protocol in a Longitudinal Study of Cognitive Decline
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Outliers Due to Participants’ Non-Adherence to Protocol in a Longitudinal Study of Cognitive Decline
title_short Detection of Outliers Due to Participants’ Non-Adherence to Protocol in a Longitudinal Study of Cognitive Decline
title_sort detection of outliers due to participants’ non-adherence to protocol in a longitudinal study of cognitive decline
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26161552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132110
work_keys_str_mv AT dugravotaline detectionofoutliersduetoparticipantsnonadherencetoprotocolinalongitudinalstudyofcognitivedecline
AT sabiaseverine detectionofoutliersduetoparticipantsnonadherencetoprotocolinalongitudinalstudyofcognitivedecline
AT shipleymartinj detectionofoutliersduetoparticipantsnonadherencetoprotocolinalongitudinalstudyofcognitivedecline
AT welchcatherine detectionofoutliersduetoparticipantsnonadherencetoprotocolinalongitudinalstudyofcognitivedecline
AT kivimakimika detectionofoutliersduetoparticipantsnonadherencetoprotocolinalongitudinalstudyofcognitivedecline
AT singhmanouxarchana detectionofoutliersduetoparticipantsnonadherencetoprotocolinalongitudinalstudyofcognitivedecline