Cargando…
The Quality of the Evidence According to GRADE Is Predominantly Low or Very Low in Oral Health Systematic Reviews
OBJECTIVES: The main objective was to assess the credibility of the evidence using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) in oral health systematic reviews on the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and elsewhere. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic Rev...
Autores principales: | Pandis, Nikolaos, Fleming, Padhraig S., Worthington, Helen, Salanti, Georgia |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26162076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131644 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: Pandis, Nikolaos, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Blinded by PRISMA: Are Systematic Reviewers Focusing on PRISMA and Ignoring Other Guidelines?
por: Fleming, Padhraig S., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
The effects of fixed and removable orthodontic retainers: a systematic review
por: Al-Moghrabi, Dalya, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Clinical evaluation of marketed orthodontic products: are researchers behind the times? A meta-epidemiological study
por: Seehra, Jadbinder, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols
por: Pandis, Nikolaos, et al.
Publicado: (2016)