Cargando…

The Harmonic Scalpel versus Conventional Hemostasis for Neck Dissection: A Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE: Neck dissection is the most definitive and effective treatment for head and neck cancer. This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy and surgical outcomes of neck dissection between the harmonic scalpel and conventional surgical techniques and conduct a quantitative meta-analysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ren, Zhen-Hu, Xu, Jian-Lin, Fan, Teng-Fei, Ji, Tong, Wu, Han-Jiang, Zhang, Chen-Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26161897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132476
_version_ 1782380708580294656
author Ren, Zhen-Hu
Xu, Jian-Lin
Fan, Teng-Fei
Ji, Tong
Wu, Han-Jiang
Zhang, Chen-Ping
author_facet Ren, Zhen-Hu
Xu, Jian-Lin
Fan, Teng-Fei
Ji, Tong
Wu, Han-Jiang
Zhang, Chen-Ping
author_sort Ren, Zhen-Hu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Neck dissection is the most definitive and effective treatment for head and neck cancer. This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy and surgical outcomes of neck dissection between the harmonic scalpel and conventional surgical techniques and conduct a quantitative meta-analysis of the randomized trials. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from the major electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library) using the keywords ‘‘harmonic scalpel’’ and ‘‘neck dissection,’’ and a quantitative meta-analysis was conducted. The operative time and intraoperative bleeding were the primary outcome measures, and other parameters assessed included the drainage fluid volume and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Seven trials that met the inclusion criteria included 406 neck dissection cases (201 in the harmonic scalpel group). Compared with conventional surgical techniques, the HS group had an operative time that was significantly reduced by 29.3 minutes [mean difference: -29.29; 95% CI = (-44.26, -14.32); P=0.0001], a reduction in intraoperative bleeding by 141.1 milliliters [mean difference: -141.13; 95% CI = (-314.99, 32.73); P=0.11], and a reduction in drainage fluid volume by 64.9 milliliters [mean difference: -64.86; 95% CI = (-110.40, -19.32); P=0.005] , but it is not significant after removal of studies driving heterogeneity. There was no significant difference in the length of the hospital stay [mean difference: -0.21; 95% CI = (-0.48, 0.07); P=0.14]. CONCLUSION: This systematic review showed that using the harmonic scalpel for neck dissection significantly reduces the operative time and drainage fluid volume and that it is not associated with an increased length of hospital stay or perioperative complications. Therefore, the harmonic scalpel method is safe and effective for neck dissection. However, the statistical heterogeneity was high. Further studies are required to substantiate our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4498925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44989252015-07-17 The Harmonic Scalpel versus Conventional Hemostasis for Neck Dissection: A Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials Ren, Zhen-Hu Xu, Jian-Lin Fan, Teng-Fei Ji, Tong Wu, Han-Jiang Zhang, Chen-Ping PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Neck dissection is the most definitive and effective treatment for head and neck cancer. This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy and surgical outcomes of neck dissection between the harmonic scalpel and conventional surgical techniques and conduct a quantitative meta-analysis of the randomized trials. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from the major electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library) using the keywords ‘‘harmonic scalpel’’ and ‘‘neck dissection,’’ and a quantitative meta-analysis was conducted. The operative time and intraoperative bleeding were the primary outcome measures, and other parameters assessed included the drainage fluid volume and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Seven trials that met the inclusion criteria included 406 neck dissection cases (201 in the harmonic scalpel group). Compared with conventional surgical techniques, the HS group had an operative time that was significantly reduced by 29.3 minutes [mean difference: -29.29; 95% CI = (-44.26, -14.32); P=0.0001], a reduction in intraoperative bleeding by 141.1 milliliters [mean difference: -141.13; 95% CI = (-314.99, 32.73); P=0.11], and a reduction in drainage fluid volume by 64.9 milliliters [mean difference: -64.86; 95% CI = (-110.40, -19.32); P=0.005] , but it is not significant after removal of studies driving heterogeneity. There was no significant difference in the length of the hospital stay [mean difference: -0.21; 95% CI = (-0.48, 0.07); P=0.14]. CONCLUSION: This systematic review showed that using the harmonic scalpel for neck dissection significantly reduces the operative time and drainage fluid volume and that it is not associated with an increased length of hospital stay or perioperative complications. Therefore, the harmonic scalpel method is safe and effective for neck dissection. However, the statistical heterogeneity was high. Further studies are required to substantiate our findings. Public Library of Science 2015-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4498925/ /pubmed/26161897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132476 Text en © 2015 Ren et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ren, Zhen-Hu
Xu, Jian-Lin
Fan, Teng-Fei
Ji, Tong
Wu, Han-Jiang
Zhang, Chen-Ping
The Harmonic Scalpel versus Conventional Hemostasis for Neck Dissection: A Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials
title The Harmonic Scalpel versus Conventional Hemostasis for Neck Dissection: A Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full The Harmonic Scalpel versus Conventional Hemostasis for Neck Dissection: A Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr The Harmonic Scalpel versus Conventional Hemostasis for Neck Dissection: A Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed The Harmonic Scalpel versus Conventional Hemostasis for Neck Dissection: A Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short The Harmonic Scalpel versus Conventional Hemostasis for Neck Dissection: A Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort harmonic scalpel versus conventional hemostasis for neck dissection: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26161897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132476
work_keys_str_mv AT renzhenhu theharmonicscalpelversusconventionalhemostasisforneckdissectionametaanalysisoftherandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xujianlin theharmonicscalpelversusconventionalhemostasisforneckdissectionametaanalysisoftherandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT fantengfei theharmonicscalpelversusconventionalhemostasisforneckdissectionametaanalysisoftherandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jitong theharmonicscalpelversusconventionalhemostasisforneckdissectionametaanalysisoftherandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wuhanjiang theharmonicscalpelversusconventionalhemostasisforneckdissectionametaanalysisoftherandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangchenping theharmonicscalpelversusconventionalhemostasisforneckdissectionametaanalysisoftherandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT renzhenhu harmonicscalpelversusconventionalhemostasisforneckdissectionametaanalysisoftherandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xujianlin harmonicscalpelversusconventionalhemostasisforneckdissectionametaanalysisoftherandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT fantengfei harmonicscalpelversusconventionalhemostasisforneckdissectionametaanalysisoftherandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jitong harmonicscalpelversusconventionalhemostasisforneckdissectionametaanalysisoftherandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wuhanjiang harmonicscalpelversusconventionalhemostasisforneckdissectionametaanalysisoftherandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangchenping harmonicscalpelversusconventionalhemostasisforneckdissectionametaanalysisoftherandomizedcontrolledtrials