Cargando…

Comprehensive gene panels provide advantages over clinical exome sequencing for Mendelian diseases

BACKGROUND: To understand the contribution of Mendelian mutations to the burden of undiagnosed diseases that are suspected to be genetic in origin, we developed a next-generation sequencing-based multiplexing assay that encompasses the ~3000 known Mendelian genes. This assay, which we term the Mende...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26112015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0693-2
_version_ 1782380744578957312
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To understand the contribution of Mendelian mutations to the burden of undiagnosed diseases that are suspected to be genetic in origin, we developed a next-generation sequencing-based multiplexing assay that encompasses the ~3000 known Mendelian genes. This assay, which we term the Mendeliome, comprises 13 gene panels based on clinical themes, covering the spectrum of pediatric and adult clinical genetic medicine. We explore how these panels compare with clinical whole exome sequencing (WES). RESULTS: We tested 2357 patients referred with suspected genetic diagnoses from virtually every medical specialty. A likely causal mutation was identified in 1018 patients, with an overall clinical sensitivity of 43 %, comparing favorably with WES. Furthermore, the cost of clinical-grade WES is high (typically more than 4500 US dollars), whereas the cost of running a sample on one of our panels is around 75–150 US dollars, depending on the panel. Of the “negative” cases, 11 % were subsequently found by WES to harbor a likely causal mutation in a known disease gene (largely in genes identified after the design of our assay), as inferred from a representative sample of 178. Although our study population is enriched for consanguinity, 245 (24 %) of solved cases were autosomal dominant and 35 (4 %) were X-linked, suggesting that our assay is also applicable to outbred populations. CONCLUSIONS: Despite missing a significant number of cases, the current version of the Mendeliome assay can account for a large proportion of suspected genetic disorders, and provides significant practical advantages over clinical WES. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0693-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4499193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44991932015-07-12 Comprehensive gene panels provide advantages over clinical exome sequencing for Mendelian diseases Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: To understand the contribution of Mendelian mutations to the burden of undiagnosed diseases that are suspected to be genetic in origin, we developed a next-generation sequencing-based multiplexing assay that encompasses the ~3000 known Mendelian genes. This assay, which we term the Mendeliome, comprises 13 gene panels based on clinical themes, covering the spectrum of pediatric and adult clinical genetic medicine. We explore how these panels compare with clinical whole exome sequencing (WES). RESULTS: We tested 2357 patients referred with suspected genetic diagnoses from virtually every medical specialty. A likely causal mutation was identified in 1018 patients, with an overall clinical sensitivity of 43 %, comparing favorably with WES. Furthermore, the cost of clinical-grade WES is high (typically more than 4500 US dollars), whereas the cost of running a sample on one of our panels is around 75–150 US dollars, depending on the panel. Of the “negative” cases, 11 % were subsequently found by WES to harbor a likely causal mutation in a known disease gene (largely in genes identified after the design of our assay), as inferred from a representative sample of 178. Although our study population is enriched for consanguinity, 245 (24 %) of solved cases were autosomal dominant and 35 (4 %) were X-linked, suggesting that our assay is also applicable to outbred populations. CONCLUSIONS: Despite missing a significant number of cases, the current version of the Mendeliome assay can account for a large proportion of suspected genetic disorders, and provides significant practical advantages over clinical WES. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0693-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-26 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4499193/ /pubmed/26112015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0693-2 Text en © Saudi Mendeliome Group. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Comprehensive gene panels provide advantages over clinical exome sequencing for Mendelian diseases
title Comprehensive gene panels provide advantages over clinical exome sequencing for Mendelian diseases
title_full Comprehensive gene panels provide advantages over clinical exome sequencing for Mendelian diseases
title_fullStr Comprehensive gene panels provide advantages over clinical exome sequencing for Mendelian diseases
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive gene panels provide advantages over clinical exome sequencing for Mendelian diseases
title_short Comprehensive gene panels provide advantages over clinical exome sequencing for Mendelian diseases
title_sort comprehensive gene panels provide advantages over clinical exome sequencing for mendelian diseases
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26112015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0693-2
work_keys_str_mv AT comprehensivegenepanelsprovideadvantagesoverclinicalexomesequencingformendeliandiseases