Cargando…

Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The first step in each systematic review is selection of the most valid database that can provide the highest number of relevant references. This study was carried out to determine the most suitable database for information retrieval in telemedicine field. METHODS: Cinhal, PubMe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmadi, Maryam, Sarabi, Roghayeh Ershad, Orak, Roohangiz Jamshidi, Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26236086
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2015.23.172-176
_version_ 1782380765056598016
author Ahmadi, Maryam
Sarabi, Roghayeh Ershad
Orak, Roohangiz Jamshidi
Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz
author_facet Ahmadi, Maryam
Sarabi, Roghayeh Ershad
Orak, Roohangiz Jamshidi
Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz
author_sort Ahmadi, Maryam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The first step in each systematic review is selection of the most valid database that can provide the highest number of relevant references. This study was carried out to determine the most suitable database for information retrieval in telemedicine field. METHODS: Cinhal, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched for telemedicine matched with Education, cost benefit and patient satisfaction. After analysis of the obtained results, the accuracy coefficient, sensitivity, uniqueness and overlap of databases were calculated. RESULTS: The studied databases differed in the number of retrieved articles. PubMed was identified as the most suitable database for retrieving information on the selected topics with the accuracy and sensitivity ratios of 50.7% and 61.4% respectively. The uniqueness percent of retrieved articles ranged from 38% for Pubmed to 3.0% for Cinhal. The highest overlap rate (18.6%) was found between PubMed and Web of Science. Less than 1% of articles have been indexed in all searched databases. CONCLUSION: PubMed is suggested as the most suitable database for starting search in telemedicine and after PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science can retrieve about 90% of the relevant articles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4499288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44992882015-07-31 Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases Ahmadi, Maryam Sarabi, Roghayeh Ershad Orak, Roohangiz Jamshidi Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz Acta Inform Med Professional Paper BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The first step in each systematic review is selection of the most valid database that can provide the highest number of relevant references. This study was carried out to determine the most suitable database for information retrieval in telemedicine field. METHODS: Cinhal, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched for telemedicine matched with Education, cost benefit and patient satisfaction. After analysis of the obtained results, the accuracy coefficient, sensitivity, uniqueness and overlap of databases were calculated. RESULTS: The studied databases differed in the number of retrieved articles. PubMed was identified as the most suitable database for retrieving information on the selected topics with the accuracy and sensitivity ratios of 50.7% and 61.4% respectively. The uniqueness percent of retrieved articles ranged from 38% for Pubmed to 3.0% for Cinhal. The highest overlap rate (18.6%) was found between PubMed and Web of Science. Less than 1% of articles have been indexed in all searched databases. CONCLUSION: PubMed is suggested as the most suitable database for starting search in telemedicine and after PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science can retrieve about 90% of the relevant articles. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2015-06 2015-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4499288/ /pubmed/26236086 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2015.23.172-176 Text en Copyright: © Maryam Ahmadi, Roghayeh Ershad Sarabi, Roohangiz Jamshidi Orak, Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Professional Paper
Ahmadi, Maryam
Sarabi, Roghayeh Ershad
Orak, Roohangiz Jamshidi
Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz
Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases
title Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases
title_full Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases
title_fullStr Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases
title_full_unstemmed Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases
title_short Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases
title_sort information retrieval in telemedicine: a comparative study on bibliographic databases
topic Professional Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26236086
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2015.23.172-176
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadimaryam informationretrievalintelemedicineacomparativestudyonbibliographicdatabases
AT sarabiroghayehershad informationretrievalintelemedicineacomparativestudyonbibliographicdatabases
AT orakroohangizjamshidi informationretrievalintelemedicineacomparativestudyonbibliographicdatabases
AT bahaadinbeigykambiz informationretrievalintelemedicineacomparativestudyonbibliographicdatabases