Cargando…
Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The first step in each systematic review is selection of the most valid database that can provide the highest number of relevant references. This study was carried out to determine the most suitable database for information retrieval in telemedicine field. METHODS: Cinhal, PubMe...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26236086 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2015.23.172-176 |
_version_ | 1782380765056598016 |
---|---|
author | Ahmadi, Maryam Sarabi, Roghayeh Ershad Orak, Roohangiz Jamshidi Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz |
author_facet | Ahmadi, Maryam Sarabi, Roghayeh Ershad Orak, Roohangiz Jamshidi Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz |
author_sort | Ahmadi, Maryam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The first step in each systematic review is selection of the most valid database that can provide the highest number of relevant references. This study was carried out to determine the most suitable database for information retrieval in telemedicine field. METHODS: Cinhal, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched for telemedicine matched with Education, cost benefit and patient satisfaction. After analysis of the obtained results, the accuracy coefficient, sensitivity, uniqueness and overlap of databases were calculated. RESULTS: The studied databases differed in the number of retrieved articles. PubMed was identified as the most suitable database for retrieving information on the selected topics with the accuracy and sensitivity ratios of 50.7% and 61.4% respectively. The uniqueness percent of retrieved articles ranged from 38% for Pubmed to 3.0% for Cinhal. The highest overlap rate (18.6%) was found between PubMed and Web of Science. Less than 1% of articles have been indexed in all searched databases. CONCLUSION: PubMed is suggested as the most suitable database for starting search in telemedicine and after PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science can retrieve about 90% of the relevant articles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4499288 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44992882015-07-31 Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases Ahmadi, Maryam Sarabi, Roghayeh Ershad Orak, Roohangiz Jamshidi Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz Acta Inform Med Professional Paper BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The first step in each systematic review is selection of the most valid database that can provide the highest number of relevant references. This study was carried out to determine the most suitable database for information retrieval in telemedicine field. METHODS: Cinhal, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched for telemedicine matched with Education, cost benefit and patient satisfaction. After analysis of the obtained results, the accuracy coefficient, sensitivity, uniqueness and overlap of databases were calculated. RESULTS: The studied databases differed in the number of retrieved articles. PubMed was identified as the most suitable database for retrieving information on the selected topics with the accuracy and sensitivity ratios of 50.7% and 61.4% respectively. The uniqueness percent of retrieved articles ranged from 38% for Pubmed to 3.0% for Cinhal. The highest overlap rate (18.6%) was found between PubMed and Web of Science. Less than 1% of articles have been indexed in all searched databases. CONCLUSION: PubMed is suggested as the most suitable database for starting search in telemedicine and after PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science can retrieve about 90% of the relevant articles. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2015-06 2015-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4499288/ /pubmed/26236086 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2015.23.172-176 Text en Copyright: © Maryam Ahmadi, Roghayeh Ershad Sarabi, Roohangiz Jamshidi Orak, Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Professional Paper Ahmadi, Maryam Sarabi, Roghayeh Ershad Orak, Roohangiz Jamshidi Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases |
title | Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases |
title_full | Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases |
title_fullStr | Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases |
title_full_unstemmed | Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases |
title_short | Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases |
title_sort | information retrieval in telemedicine: a comparative study on bibliographic databases |
topic | Professional Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26236086 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2015.23.172-176 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmadimaryam informationretrievalintelemedicineacomparativestudyonbibliographicdatabases AT sarabiroghayehershad informationretrievalintelemedicineacomparativestudyonbibliographicdatabases AT orakroohangizjamshidi informationretrievalintelemedicineacomparativestudyonbibliographicdatabases AT bahaadinbeigykambiz informationretrievalintelemedicineacomparativestudyonbibliographicdatabases |