Cargando…
Semiautomatic, Quantitative Measurement of Aortic Valve Area Using CTA: Validation and Comparison with Transthoracic Echocardiography
Objective. The aim of this work was to develop a fast and robust (semi)automatic segmentation technique of the aortic valve area (AVA) MDCT datasets. Methods. The algorithm starts with detection and cropping of Sinus of Valsalva on MPR image. The cropped image is then binarized and seed points are m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26221603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/648283 |
_version_ | 1782380817228496896 |
---|---|
author | Tuncay, V. Prakken, N. van Ooijen, P. M. A. Budde, R. P. J. Leiner, T. Oudkerk, M. |
author_facet | Tuncay, V. Prakken, N. van Ooijen, P. M. A. Budde, R. P. J. Leiner, T. Oudkerk, M. |
author_sort | Tuncay, V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. The aim of this work was to develop a fast and robust (semi)automatic segmentation technique of the aortic valve area (AVA) MDCT datasets. Methods. The algorithm starts with detection and cropping of Sinus of Valsalva on MPR image. The cropped image is then binarized and seed points are manually selected to create an initial contour. The contour moves automatically towards the edge of aortic AVA to obtain a segmentation of the AVA. AVA was segmented semiautomatically and manually by two observers in multiphase cardiac CT scans of 25 patients. Validation of the algorithm was obtained by comparing to Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE). Intra- and interobserver variability were calculated by relative differences. Differences between TTE and MDCT manual and semiautomatic measurements were assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. Time required for manual and semiautomatic segmentations was recorded. Results. Mean differences from TTE were −0.19 (95% CI: −0.74 to 0.34) cm(2) for manual and −0.10 (95% CI: −0.45 to 0.25) cm(2) for semiautomatic measurements. Intra- and interobserver variability were 8.4 ± 7.1% and 27.6 ± 16.0% for manual, and 5.8 ± 4.5% and 16.8 ± 12.7% for semiautomatic measurements, respectively. Conclusion. Newly developed semiautomatic segmentation provides an accurate, more reproducible, and faster AVA segmentation result. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4499628 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44996282015-07-28 Semiautomatic, Quantitative Measurement of Aortic Valve Area Using CTA: Validation and Comparison with Transthoracic Echocardiography Tuncay, V. Prakken, N. van Ooijen, P. M. A. Budde, R. P. J. Leiner, T. Oudkerk, M. Biomed Res Int Research Article Objective. The aim of this work was to develop a fast and robust (semi)automatic segmentation technique of the aortic valve area (AVA) MDCT datasets. Methods. The algorithm starts with detection and cropping of Sinus of Valsalva on MPR image. The cropped image is then binarized and seed points are manually selected to create an initial contour. The contour moves automatically towards the edge of aortic AVA to obtain a segmentation of the AVA. AVA was segmented semiautomatically and manually by two observers in multiphase cardiac CT scans of 25 patients. Validation of the algorithm was obtained by comparing to Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE). Intra- and interobserver variability were calculated by relative differences. Differences between TTE and MDCT manual and semiautomatic measurements were assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. Time required for manual and semiautomatic segmentations was recorded. Results. Mean differences from TTE were −0.19 (95% CI: −0.74 to 0.34) cm(2) for manual and −0.10 (95% CI: −0.45 to 0.25) cm(2) for semiautomatic measurements. Intra- and interobserver variability were 8.4 ± 7.1% and 27.6 ± 16.0% for manual, and 5.8 ± 4.5% and 16.8 ± 12.7% for semiautomatic measurements, respectively. Conclusion. Newly developed semiautomatic segmentation provides an accurate, more reproducible, and faster AVA segmentation result. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4499628/ /pubmed/26221603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/648283 Text en Copyright © 2015 V. Tuncay et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tuncay, V. Prakken, N. van Ooijen, P. M. A. Budde, R. P. J. Leiner, T. Oudkerk, M. Semiautomatic, Quantitative Measurement of Aortic Valve Area Using CTA: Validation and Comparison with Transthoracic Echocardiography |
title | Semiautomatic, Quantitative Measurement of Aortic Valve Area Using CTA: Validation and Comparison with Transthoracic Echocardiography |
title_full | Semiautomatic, Quantitative Measurement of Aortic Valve Area Using CTA: Validation and Comparison with Transthoracic Echocardiography |
title_fullStr | Semiautomatic, Quantitative Measurement of Aortic Valve Area Using CTA: Validation and Comparison with Transthoracic Echocardiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Semiautomatic, Quantitative Measurement of Aortic Valve Area Using CTA: Validation and Comparison with Transthoracic Echocardiography |
title_short | Semiautomatic, Quantitative Measurement of Aortic Valve Area Using CTA: Validation and Comparison with Transthoracic Echocardiography |
title_sort | semiautomatic, quantitative measurement of aortic valve area using cta: validation and comparison with transthoracic echocardiography |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26221603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/648283 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tuncayv semiautomaticquantitativemeasurementofaorticvalveareausingctavalidationandcomparisonwithtransthoracicechocardiography AT prakkenn semiautomaticquantitativemeasurementofaorticvalveareausingctavalidationandcomparisonwithtransthoracicechocardiography AT vanooijenpma semiautomaticquantitativemeasurementofaorticvalveareausingctavalidationandcomparisonwithtransthoracicechocardiography AT budderpj semiautomaticquantitativemeasurementofaorticvalveareausingctavalidationandcomparisonwithtransthoracicechocardiography AT leinert semiautomaticquantitativemeasurementofaorticvalveareausingctavalidationandcomparisonwithtransthoracicechocardiography AT oudkerkm semiautomaticquantitativemeasurementofaorticvalveareausingctavalidationandcomparisonwithtransthoracicechocardiography |