Cargando…
A research protocol for developing a Point-Of-Care Key Evidence Tool ‘POCKET’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics
INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care in vitro diagnostics (POC-IVD) are increasingly becoming widespread as an acceptable means of providing rapid diagnostic results to facilitate decision-making in many clinical pathways. Evidence in utility, usability and cost-effectiveness is currently provided in a fragm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26163033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007840 |
_version_ | 1782380830272782336 |
---|---|
author | Huddy, Jeremy R Ni, Melody Mavroveli, Stella Barlow, James Williams, Doris-Ann Hanna, George B |
author_facet | Huddy, Jeremy R Ni, Melody Mavroveli, Stella Barlow, James Williams, Doris-Ann Hanna, George B |
author_sort | Huddy, Jeremy R |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care in vitro diagnostics (POC-IVD) are increasingly becoming widespread as an acceptable means of providing rapid diagnostic results to facilitate decision-making in many clinical pathways. Evidence in utility, usability and cost-effectiveness is currently provided in a fragmented and detached manner that is fraught with methodological challenges given the disruptive nature these tests have on the clinical pathway. The Point-of-care Key Evidence Tool (POCKET) checklist aims to provide an integrated evidence-based framework that incorporates all required evidence to guide the evaluation of POC-IVD to meet the needs of policy and decisionmakers in the National Health Service (NHS). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multimethod approach will be applied in order to develop the POCKET. A thorough literature review has formed the basis of a robust Delphi process and validation study. Semistructured interviews are being undertaken with POC-IVD stakeholders, including industry, regulators, commissioners, clinicians and patients to understand what evidence is required to facilitate decision-making. Emergent themes will be translated into a series of statements to form a survey questionnaire that aims to reach a consensus in each stakeholder group to what needs to be included in the tool. Results will be presented to a workshop to discuss the statements brought forward and the optimal format for the tool. Once assembled, the tool will be field-tested through case studies to ensure validity and usability and inform refinement, if required. The final version will be published online with a call for comments. Limitations include unpredictable sample representation, development of compromise position rather than consensus, and absence of blinding in validation exercise. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Imperial College Joint Research Compliance Office and the Imperial College Hospitals NHS Trust R&D department have approved the protocol. The checklist tool will be disseminated through a PhD thesis, a website, peer-reviewed publication, academic conferences and formal presentations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4499707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44997072015-07-15 A research protocol for developing a Point-Of-Care Key Evidence Tool ‘POCKET’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics Huddy, Jeremy R Ni, Melody Mavroveli, Stella Barlow, James Williams, Doris-Ann Hanna, George B BMJ Open Diagnostics INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care in vitro diagnostics (POC-IVD) are increasingly becoming widespread as an acceptable means of providing rapid diagnostic results to facilitate decision-making in many clinical pathways. Evidence in utility, usability and cost-effectiveness is currently provided in a fragmented and detached manner that is fraught with methodological challenges given the disruptive nature these tests have on the clinical pathway. The Point-of-care Key Evidence Tool (POCKET) checklist aims to provide an integrated evidence-based framework that incorporates all required evidence to guide the evaluation of POC-IVD to meet the needs of policy and decisionmakers in the National Health Service (NHS). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multimethod approach will be applied in order to develop the POCKET. A thorough literature review has formed the basis of a robust Delphi process and validation study. Semistructured interviews are being undertaken with POC-IVD stakeholders, including industry, regulators, commissioners, clinicians and patients to understand what evidence is required to facilitate decision-making. Emergent themes will be translated into a series of statements to form a survey questionnaire that aims to reach a consensus in each stakeholder group to what needs to be included in the tool. Results will be presented to a workshop to discuss the statements brought forward and the optimal format for the tool. Once assembled, the tool will be field-tested through case studies to ensure validity and usability and inform refinement, if required. The final version will be published online with a call for comments. Limitations include unpredictable sample representation, development of compromise position rather than consensus, and absence of blinding in validation exercise. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Imperial College Joint Research Compliance Office and the Imperial College Hospitals NHS Trust R&D department have approved the protocol. The checklist tool will be disseminated through a PhD thesis, a website, peer-reviewed publication, academic conferences and formal presentations. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4499707/ /pubmed/26163033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007840 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Diagnostics Huddy, Jeremy R Ni, Melody Mavroveli, Stella Barlow, James Williams, Doris-Ann Hanna, George B A research protocol for developing a Point-Of-Care Key Evidence Tool ‘POCKET’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics |
title | A research protocol for developing a Point-Of-Care Key Evidence Tool ‘POCKET’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics |
title_full | A research protocol for developing a Point-Of-Care Key Evidence Tool ‘POCKET’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics |
title_fullStr | A research protocol for developing a Point-Of-Care Key Evidence Tool ‘POCKET’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics |
title_full_unstemmed | A research protocol for developing a Point-Of-Care Key Evidence Tool ‘POCKET’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics |
title_short | A research protocol for developing a Point-Of-Care Key Evidence Tool ‘POCKET’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics |
title_sort | research protocol for developing a point-of-care key evidence tool ‘pocket’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics |
topic | Diagnostics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26163033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007840 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huddyjeremyr aresearchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics AT nimelody aresearchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics AT mavrovelistella aresearchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics AT barlowjames aresearchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics AT williamsdorisann aresearchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics AT hannageorgeb aresearchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics AT huddyjeremyr researchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics AT nimelody researchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics AT mavrovelistella researchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics AT barlowjames researchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics AT williamsdorisann researchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics AT hannageorgeb researchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics |