Cargando…

A research protocol for developing a Point-Of-Care Key Evidence Tool ‘POCKET’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics

INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care in vitro diagnostics (POC-IVD) are increasingly becoming widespread as an acceptable means of providing rapid diagnostic results to facilitate decision-making in many clinical pathways. Evidence in utility, usability and cost-effectiveness is currently provided in a fragm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huddy, Jeremy R, Ni, Melody, Mavroveli, Stella, Barlow, James, Williams, Doris-Ann, Hanna, George B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26163033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007840
_version_ 1782380830272782336
author Huddy, Jeremy R
Ni, Melody
Mavroveli, Stella
Barlow, James
Williams, Doris-Ann
Hanna, George B
author_facet Huddy, Jeremy R
Ni, Melody
Mavroveli, Stella
Barlow, James
Williams, Doris-Ann
Hanna, George B
author_sort Huddy, Jeremy R
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care in vitro diagnostics (POC-IVD) are increasingly becoming widespread as an acceptable means of providing rapid diagnostic results to facilitate decision-making in many clinical pathways. Evidence in utility, usability and cost-effectiveness is currently provided in a fragmented and detached manner that is fraught with methodological challenges given the disruptive nature these tests have on the clinical pathway. The Point-of-care Key Evidence Tool (POCKET) checklist aims to provide an integrated evidence-based framework that incorporates all required evidence to guide the evaluation of POC-IVD to meet the needs of policy and decisionmakers in the National Health Service (NHS). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multimethod approach will be applied in order to develop the POCKET. A thorough literature review has formed the basis of a robust Delphi process and validation study. Semistructured interviews are being undertaken with POC-IVD stakeholders, including industry, regulators, commissioners, clinicians and patients to understand what evidence is required to facilitate decision-making. Emergent themes will be translated into a series of statements to form a survey questionnaire that aims to reach a consensus in each stakeholder group to what needs to be included in the tool. Results will be presented to a workshop to discuss the statements brought forward and the optimal format for the tool. Once assembled, the tool will be field-tested through case studies to ensure validity and usability and inform refinement, if required. The final version will be published online with a call for comments. Limitations include unpredictable sample representation, development of compromise position rather than consensus, and absence of blinding in validation exercise. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Imperial College Joint Research Compliance Office and the Imperial College Hospitals NHS Trust R&D department have approved the protocol. The checklist tool will be disseminated through a PhD thesis, a website, peer-reviewed publication, academic conferences and formal presentations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4499707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44997072015-07-15 A research protocol for developing a Point-Of-Care Key Evidence Tool ‘POCKET’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics Huddy, Jeremy R Ni, Melody Mavroveli, Stella Barlow, James Williams, Doris-Ann Hanna, George B BMJ Open Diagnostics INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care in vitro diagnostics (POC-IVD) are increasingly becoming widespread as an acceptable means of providing rapid diagnostic results to facilitate decision-making in many clinical pathways. Evidence in utility, usability and cost-effectiveness is currently provided in a fragmented and detached manner that is fraught with methodological challenges given the disruptive nature these tests have on the clinical pathway. The Point-of-care Key Evidence Tool (POCKET) checklist aims to provide an integrated evidence-based framework that incorporates all required evidence to guide the evaluation of POC-IVD to meet the needs of policy and decisionmakers in the National Health Service (NHS). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multimethod approach will be applied in order to develop the POCKET. A thorough literature review has formed the basis of a robust Delphi process and validation study. Semistructured interviews are being undertaken with POC-IVD stakeholders, including industry, regulators, commissioners, clinicians and patients to understand what evidence is required to facilitate decision-making. Emergent themes will be translated into a series of statements to form a survey questionnaire that aims to reach a consensus in each stakeholder group to what needs to be included in the tool. Results will be presented to a workshop to discuss the statements brought forward and the optimal format for the tool. Once assembled, the tool will be field-tested through case studies to ensure validity and usability and inform refinement, if required. The final version will be published online with a call for comments. Limitations include unpredictable sample representation, development of compromise position rather than consensus, and absence of blinding in validation exercise. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Imperial College Joint Research Compliance Office and the Imperial College Hospitals NHS Trust R&D department have approved the protocol. The checklist tool will be disseminated through a PhD thesis, a website, peer-reviewed publication, academic conferences and formal presentations. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4499707/ /pubmed/26163033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007840 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Diagnostics
Huddy, Jeremy R
Ni, Melody
Mavroveli, Stella
Barlow, James
Williams, Doris-Ann
Hanna, George B
A research protocol for developing a Point-Of-Care Key Evidence Tool ‘POCKET’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics
title A research protocol for developing a Point-Of-Care Key Evidence Tool ‘POCKET’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics
title_full A research protocol for developing a Point-Of-Care Key Evidence Tool ‘POCKET’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics
title_fullStr A research protocol for developing a Point-Of-Care Key Evidence Tool ‘POCKET’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics
title_full_unstemmed A research protocol for developing a Point-Of-Care Key Evidence Tool ‘POCKET’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics
title_short A research protocol for developing a Point-Of-Care Key Evidence Tool ‘POCKET’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics
title_sort research protocol for developing a point-of-care key evidence tool ‘pocket’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics
topic Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26163033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007840
work_keys_str_mv AT huddyjeremyr aresearchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics
AT nimelody aresearchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics
AT mavrovelistella aresearchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics
AT barlowjames aresearchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics
AT williamsdorisann aresearchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics
AT hannageorgeb aresearchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics
AT huddyjeremyr researchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics
AT nimelody researchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics
AT mavrovelistella researchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics
AT barlowjames researchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics
AT williamsdorisann researchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics
AT hannageorgeb researchprotocolfordevelopingapointofcarekeyevidencetoolpocketachecklistformultidimensionalevidencereportingonpointofcareinvitrodiagnostics