Cargando…

To tweet or not to tweet about schizophrenia systematic reviews (TweetSz): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group (CSzG) has produced and maintained systematic reviews of effects of interventions for schizophrenia and related illness. Each review has a Plain Language Summary (PLS), for those without specialised knowledge, and an abstract, which are freely available...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jayaram, Mahesh, Bodart, Angelique Y M, Sampson, Stephanie, Zhao, Sai, Montgomery, Alan A, Adams, Clive E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26159452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007695
_version_ 1782380831400001536
author Jayaram, Mahesh
Bodart, Angelique Y M
Sampson, Stephanie
Zhao, Sai
Montgomery, Alan A
Adams, Clive E
author_facet Jayaram, Mahesh
Bodart, Angelique Y M
Sampson, Stephanie
Zhao, Sai
Montgomery, Alan A
Adams, Clive E
author_sort Jayaram, Mahesh
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group (CSzG) has produced and maintained systematic reviews of effects of interventions for schizophrenia and related illness. Each review has a Plain Language Summary (PLS), for those without specialised knowledge, and an abstract, which are freely available from The Cochrane Library (https://summaries.cochrane.org). Increasingly, evidence is being distributed using social media such as Twitter and Weibo (in China) alongside traditional publications. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a prospective two-arm, parallel, open randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio, we will allocate 170 published systematic reviews into the intervention group (tweeting arm/Weibo arm) versus the control group (non-tweeting arm). Reviews will be stratified by baseline access activity, defined as high (≥19 views per week, n=14), medium (4.3 to 18.99 views per week, n=72) or low (<4.3 views per week, n=84), based on Google Analytics, which will also be used for evaluating outcomes. The intervention group will have three tweets daily using Hootsuite with a slightly different accompanying text (written by CEA and AB) and a shortened Uniform Resource Locator (URL) to the PLS: a) The review title as it appears in summaries.cochrane.org, b) A pertinent extract from results or discussion sections of the abstract and c) An intriguing question or pithy statement related to the evidence in the abstract. The primary outcome will be: total number of visits to a PLS in 7 days following the tweet. Secondary outcomes will include % new visits, bounce rate, pages per visit, visit duration, page views, unique page views, time on page, entrances, exiting behaviour and country distribution. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study does not involve living participants, and uses information available in the public domain. Participants are published systematic reviews, hence, no ethical approval is required. Dissemination will be via Twitter, Weibo and traditional academic means. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN84658943.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4499712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44997122015-07-15 To tweet or not to tweet about schizophrenia systematic reviews (TweetSz): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Jayaram, Mahesh Bodart, Angelique Y M Sampson, Stephanie Zhao, Sai Montgomery, Alan A Adams, Clive E BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group (CSzG) has produced and maintained systematic reviews of effects of interventions for schizophrenia and related illness. Each review has a Plain Language Summary (PLS), for those without specialised knowledge, and an abstract, which are freely available from The Cochrane Library (https://summaries.cochrane.org). Increasingly, evidence is being distributed using social media such as Twitter and Weibo (in China) alongside traditional publications. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a prospective two-arm, parallel, open randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio, we will allocate 170 published systematic reviews into the intervention group (tweeting arm/Weibo arm) versus the control group (non-tweeting arm). Reviews will be stratified by baseline access activity, defined as high (≥19 views per week, n=14), medium (4.3 to 18.99 views per week, n=72) or low (<4.3 views per week, n=84), based on Google Analytics, which will also be used for evaluating outcomes. The intervention group will have three tweets daily using Hootsuite with a slightly different accompanying text (written by CEA and AB) and a shortened Uniform Resource Locator (URL) to the PLS: a) The review title as it appears in summaries.cochrane.org, b) A pertinent extract from results or discussion sections of the abstract and c) An intriguing question or pithy statement related to the evidence in the abstract. The primary outcome will be: total number of visits to a PLS in 7 days following the tweet. Secondary outcomes will include % new visits, bounce rate, pages per visit, visit duration, page views, unique page views, time on page, entrances, exiting behaviour and country distribution. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study does not involve living participants, and uses information available in the public domain. Participants are published systematic reviews, hence, no ethical approval is required. Dissemination will be via Twitter, Weibo and traditional academic means. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN84658943. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4499712/ /pubmed/26159452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007695 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Jayaram, Mahesh
Bodart, Angelique Y M
Sampson, Stephanie
Zhao, Sai
Montgomery, Alan A
Adams, Clive E
To tweet or not to tweet about schizophrenia systematic reviews (TweetSz): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title To tweet or not to tweet about schizophrenia systematic reviews (TweetSz): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full To tweet or not to tweet about schizophrenia systematic reviews (TweetSz): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr To tweet or not to tweet about schizophrenia systematic reviews (TweetSz): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed To tweet or not to tweet about schizophrenia systematic reviews (TweetSz): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short To tweet or not to tweet about schizophrenia systematic reviews (TweetSz): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort to tweet or not to tweet about schizophrenia systematic reviews (tweetsz): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26159452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007695
work_keys_str_mv AT jayarammahesh totweetornottotweetaboutschizophreniasystematicreviewstweetszstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bodartangeliqueym totweetornottotweetaboutschizophreniasystematicreviewstweetszstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sampsonstephanie totweetornottotweetaboutschizophreniasystematicreviewstweetszstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zhaosai totweetornottotweetaboutschizophreniasystematicreviewstweetszstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT montgomeryalana totweetornottotweetaboutschizophreniasystematicreviewstweetszstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT adamsclivee totweetornottotweetaboutschizophreniasystematicreviewstweetszstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial