Cargando…

Emergency supply of prescription-only medicines to patients by community pharmacists: a mixed methods evaluation incorporating patient, pharmacist and GP perspectives

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and inform emergency supply of prescription-only medicines by community pharmacists (CPs), including how the service could form an integral component of established healthcare provision to maximise adherence. DESIGN: Mixed methods. 4 phases: prospective audit of emergency supp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morecroft, Charles W, Mackridge, Adam J, Stokes, Elizabeth C, Gray, Nicola J, Wilson, Sarah E, Ashcroft, Darren M, Mensah, Noah, Pickup, Graham B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26163029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006934
_version_ 1782380832542949376
author Morecroft, Charles W
Mackridge, Adam J
Stokes, Elizabeth C
Gray, Nicola J
Wilson, Sarah E
Ashcroft, Darren M
Mensah, Noah
Pickup, Graham B
author_facet Morecroft, Charles W
Mackridge, Adam J
Stokes, Elizabeth C
Gray, Nicola J
Wilson, Sarah E
Ashcroft, Darren M
Mensah, Noah
Pickup, Graham B
author_sort Morecroft, Charles W
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and inform emergency supply of prescription-only medicines by community pharmacists (CPs), including how the service could form an integral component of established healthcare provision to maximise adherence. DESIGN: Mixed methods. 4 phases: prospective audit of emergency supply requests for prescribed medicines (October–November 2012 and April 2013); interviews with CPs (February–April 2013); follow-up interviews with patients (April–May 2013); interactive feedback sessions with general practice teams (October–November 2013). SETTING: 22 community pharmacies and 6 general practices in Northwest England. PARTICIPANTS: 27 CPs with experience of dealing with requests for emergency supplies; 25 patients who received an emergency supply of a prescribed medicine; 58 staff at 6 general practices. RESULTS: Clinical audit in 22 pharmacies over two 4-week periods reported that 526 medicines were requested by 450 patients. Requests peaked over a bank holiday and around weekends. A significant number of supplies were made during practice opening hours. Most requests were for older patients and for medicines used in long-term conditions. Difficulty in renewing repeat medication (forgetting to order, or prescription delays) was the major reason for requests. The majority of medicines were ‘loaned’ in advance of a National Health Service (NHS) prescription. Interviews with CPs and patients indicated that continuous supply had a positive impact on medicines adherence, removing the need to access urgent care. General practice staff were surprised and concerned by the extent of emergency supply episodes. CONCLUSIONS: CPs regularly provide emergency supplies to patients who run out of their repeat medication, including during practice opening hours. This may aid adherence. There is currently no feedback loop, however, to general practice. Patient care and interprofessional communication may be better served by the introduction of a formally structured and funded NHS emergency supply service from community pharmacies, with ongoing optimisation of repeat prescribing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4499725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44997252015-07-15 Emergency supply of prescription-only medicines to patients by community pharmacists: a mixed methods evaluation incorporating patient, pharmacist and GP perspectives Morecroft, Charles W Mackridge, Adam J Stokes, Elizabeth C Gray, Nicola J Wilson, Sarah E Ashcroft, Darren M Mensah, Noah Pickup, Graham B BMJ Open Pharmacology and Therapeutics OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and inform emergency supply of prescription-only medicines by community pharmacists (CPs), including how the service could form an integral component of established healthcare provision to maximise adherence. DESIGN: Mixed methods. 4 phases: prospective audit of emergency supply requests for prescribed medicines (October–November 2012 and April 2013); interviews with CPs (February–April 2013); follow-up interviews with patients (April–May 2013); interactive feedback sessions with general practice teams (October–November 2013). SETTING: 22 community pharmacies and 6 general practices in Northwest England. PARTICIPANTS: 27 CPs with experience of dealing with requests for emergency supplies; 25 patients who received an emergency supply of a prescribed medicine; 58 staff at 6 general practices. RESULTS: Clinical audit in 22 pharmacies over two 4-week periods reported that 526 medicines were requested by 450 patients. Requests peaked over a bank holiday and around weekends. A significant number of supplies were made during practice opening hours. Most requests were for older patients and for medicines used in long-term conditions. Difficulty in renewing repeat medication (forgetting to order, or prescription delays) was the major reason for requests. The majority of medicines were ‘loaned’ in advance of a National Health Service (NHS) prescription. Interviews with CPs and patients indicated that continuous supply had a positive impact on medicines adherence, removing the need to access urgent care. General practice staff were surprised and concerned by the extent of emergency supply episodes. CONCLUSIONS: CPs regularly provide emergency supplies to patients who run out of their repeat medication, including during practice opening hours. This may aid adherence. There is currently no feedback loop, however, to general practice. Patient care and interprofessional communication may be better served by the introduction of a formally structured and funded NHS emergency supply service from community pharmacies, with ongoing optimisation of repeat prescribing. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4499725/ /pubmed/26163029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006934 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Morecroft, Charles W
Mackridge, Adam J
Stokes, Elizabeth C
Gray, Nicola J
Wilson, Sarah E
Ashcroft, Darren M
Mensah, Noah
Pickup, Graham B
Emergency supply of prescription-only medicines to patients by community pharmacists: a mixed methods evaluation incorporating patient, pharmacist and GP perspectives
title Emergency supply of prescription-only medicines to patients by community pharmacists: a mixed methods evaluation incorporating patient, pharmacist and GP perspectives
title_full Emergency supply of prescription-only medicines to patients by community pharmacists: a mixed methods evaluation incorporating patient, pharmacist and GP perspectives
title_fullStr Emergency supply of prescription-only medicines to patients by community pharmacists: a mixed methods evaluation incorporating patient, pharmacist and GP perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Emergency supply of prescription-only medicines to patients by community pharmacists: a mixed methods evaluation incorporating patient, pharmacist and GP perspectives
title_short Emergency supply of prescription-only medicines to patients by community pharmacists: a mixed methods evaluation incorporating patient, pharmacist and GP perspectives
title_sort emergency supply of prescription-only medicines to patients by community pharmacists: a mixed methods evaluation incorporating patient, pharmacist and gp perspectives
topic Pharmacology and Therapeutics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26163029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006934
work_keys_str_mv AT morecroftcharlesw emergencysupplyofprescriptiononlymedicinestopatientsbycommunitypharmacistsamixedmethodsevaluationincorporatingpatientpharmacistandgpperspectives
AT mackridgeadamj emergencysupplyofprescriptiononlymedicinestopatientsbycommunitypharmacistsamixedmethodsevaluationincorporatingpatientpharmacistandgpperspectives
AT stokeselizabethc emergencysupplyofprescriptiononlymedicinestopatientsbycommunitypharmacistsamixedmethodsevaluationincorporatingpatientpharmacistandgpperspectives
AT graynicolaj emergencysupplyofprescriptiononlymedicinestopatientsbycommunitypharmacistsamixedmethodsevaluationincorporatingpatientpharmacistandgpperspectives
AT wilsonsarahe emergencysupplyofprescriptiononlymedicinestopatientsbycommunitypharmacistsamixedmethodsevaluationincorporatingpatientpharmacistandgpperspectives
AT ashcroftdarrenm emergencysupplyofprescriptiononlymedicinestopatientsbycommunitypharmacistsamixedmethodsevaluationincorporatingpatientpharmacistandgpperspectives
AT mensahnoah emergencysupplyofprescriptiononlymedicinestopatientsbycommunitypharmacistsamixedmethodsevaluationincorporatingpatientpharmacistandgpperspectives
AT pickupgrahamb emergencysupplyofprescriptiononlymedicinestopatientsbycommunitypharmacistsamixedmethodsevaluationincorporatingpatientpharmacistandgpperspectives