Cargando…

Evaluation of the fidelity of an interactive face-to-face educational intervention to improve general practitioner management of back pain

OBJECTIVES: Implementation intervention effects can only be fully realised and understood if they are faithfully delivered. However the evaluation of implementation intervention fidelity is not commonly undertaken. The IMPLEMENT intervention was designed to improve the management of low back pain by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: French, Simon D, Green, Sally E, Francis, Jill J, Buchbinder, Rachelle, O'Connor, Denise A, Grimshaw, Jeremy M, Michie, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26155819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007886
_version_ 1782380832765247488
author French, Simon D
Green, Sally E
Francis, Jill J
Buchbinder, Rachelle
O'Connor, Denise A
Grimshaw, Jeremy M
Michie, Susan
author_facet French, Simon D
Green, Sally E
Francis, Jill J
Buchbinder, Rachelle
O'Connor, Denise A
Grimshaw, Jeremy M
Michie, Susan
author_sort French, Simon D
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Implementation intervention effects can only be fully realised and understood if they are faithfully delivered. However the evaluation of implementation intervention fidelity is not commonly undertaken. The IMPLEMENT intervention was designed to improve the management of low back pain by general medical practitioners. It consisted of a two-session interactive workshop, including didactic presentations and small group discussions by trained facilitators. This study aimed to evaluate the fidelity of the IMPLEMENT intervention by assessing: (1) observed facilitator adherence to planned behaviour change techniques (BCTs); (2) comparison of observed and self-reported adherence to planned BCTs and (3) variation across different facilitators and different BCTs. DESIGN: The study compared planned and actual, and observed versus self-assessed delivery of BCTs during the IMPLEMENT workshops. METHOD: Workshop sessions were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. Observed adherence of facilitators to the planned intervention was assessed by analysing the workshop transcripts in terms of BCTs delivered. Self-reported adherence was measured using a checklist completed at the end of each workshop session and was compared with the ‘gold standard’ of observed adherence using sensitivity and specificity analyses. RESULTS: The overall observed adherence to planned BCTs was 79%, representing moderate-to-high intervention fidelity. There was no significant difference in adherence to BCTs between the facilitators. Sensitivity of self-reported adherence was 95% (95% CI 88 to 98) and specificity was 30% (95% CI 11 to 60). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the IMPLEMENT intervention was delivered with high levels of adherence to the planned intervention protocol. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The IMPLEMENT trial was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN012606000098538 (http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial_view.aspx?ID=1162).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4499726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44997262015-07-15 Evaluation of the fidelity of an interactive face-to-face educational intervention to improve general practitioner management of back pain French, Simon D Green, Sally E Francis, Jill J Buchbinder, Rachelle O'Connor, Denise A Grimshaw, Jeremy M Michie, Susan BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: Implementation intervention effects can only be fully realised and understood if they are faithfully delivered. However the evaluation of implementation intervention fidelity is not commonly undertaken. The IMPLEMENT intervention was designed to improve the management of low back pain by general medical practitioners. It consisted of a two-session interactive workshop, including didactic presentations and small group discussions by trained facilitators. This study aimed to evaluate the fidelity of the IMPLEMENT intervention by assessing: (1) observed facilitator adherence to planned behaviour change techniques (BCTs); (2) comparison of observed and self-reported adherence to planned BCTs and (3) variation across different facilitators and different BCTs. DESIGN: The study compared planned and actual, and observed versus self-assessed delivery of BCTs during the IMPLEMENT workshops. METHOD: Workshop sessions were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. Observed adherence of facilitators to the planned intervention was assessed by analysing the workshop transcripts in terms of BCTs delivered. Self-reported adherence was measured using a checklist completed at the end of each workshop session and was compared with the ‘gold standard’ of observed adherence using sensitivity and specificity analyses. RESULTS: The overall observed adherence to planned BCTs was 79%, representing moderate-to-high intervention fidelity. There was no significant difference in adherence to BCTs between the facilitators. Sensitivity of self-reported adherence was 95% (95% CI 88 to 98) and specificity was 30% (95% CI 11 to 60). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the IMPLEMENT intervention was delivered with high levels of adherence to the planned intervention protocol. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The IMPLEMENT trial was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN012606000098538 (http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial_view.aspx?ID=1162). BMJ Publishing Group 2015-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4499726/ /pubmed/26155819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007886 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
French, Simon D
Green, Sally E
Francis, Jill J
Buchbinder, Rachelle
O'Connor, Denise A
Grimshaw, Jeremy M
Michie, Susan
Evaluation of the fidelity of an interactive face-to-face educational intervention to improve general practitioner management of back pain
title Evaluation of the fidelity of an interactive face-to-face educational intervention to improve general practitioner management of back pain
title_full Evaluation of the fidelity of an interactive face-to-face educational intervention to improve general practitioner management of back pain
title_fullStr Evaluation of the fidelity of an interactive face-to-face educational intervention to improve general practitioner management of back pain
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the fidelity of an interactive face-to-face educational intervention to improve general practitioner management of back pain
title_short Evaluation of the fidelity of an interactive face-to-face educational intervention to improve general practitioner management of back pain
title_sort evaluation of the fidelity of an interactive face-to-face educational intervention to improve general practitioner management of back pain
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26155819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007886
work_keys_str_mv AT frenchsimond evaluationofthefidelityofaninteractivefacetofaceeducationalinterventiontoimprovegeneralpractitionermanagementofbackpain
AT greensallye evaluationofthefidelityofaninteractivefacetofaceeducationalinterventiontoimprovegeneralpractitionermanagementofbackpain
AT francisjillj evaluationofthefidelityofaninteractivefacetofaceeducationalinterventiontoimprovegeneralpractitionermanagementofbackpain
AT buchbinderrachelle evaluationofthefidelityofaninteractivefacetofaceeducationalinterventiontoimprovegeneralpractitionermanagementofbackpain
AT oconnordenisea evaluationofthefidelityofaninteractivefacetofaceeducationalinterventiontoimprovegeneralpractitionermanagementofbackpain
AT grimshawjeremym evaluationofthefidelityofaninteractivefacetofaceeducationalinterventiontoimprovegeneralpractitionermanagementofbackpain
AT michiesusan evaluationofthefidelityofaninteractivefacetofaceeducationalinterventiontoimprovegeneralpractitionermanagementofbackpain