Cargando…

Women's interpretation of and responses to potential gynaecological cancer symptoms: a qualitative interview study

OBJECTIVE: To explore women's experiences of symptoms potentially indicative of gynaecological cancer in a community-based sample without imposing a cancer perspective. DESIGN: A qualitative interview study with thematic analysis of transcripts. PARTICIPANTS: 26 women aged ≥30 years, who had ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Low, E L, Whitaker, K L, Simon, A E, Sekhon, M, Waller, J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26150145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008082
_version_ 1782380832999079936
author Low, E L
Whitaker, K L
Simon, A E
Sekhon, M
Waller, J
author_facet Low, E L
Whitaker, K L
Simon, A E
Sekhon, M
Waller, J
author_sort Low, E L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore women's experiences of symptoms potentially indicative of gynaecological cancer in a community-based sample without imposing a cancer perspective. DESIGN: A qualitative interview study with thematic analysis of transcripts. PARTICIPANTS: 26 women aged ≥30 years, who had experienced a symptom that might indicate gynaecological cancer in the past 3 months, were recruited using a screening questionnaire distributed online and in community settings. SETTING: London, UK. RESULTS: Women attributed gynaecological symptoms to existing illnesses/conditions or considered themselves to be predisposed to them, either through their ‘genes’ or previous personal experience. Normalising symptoms by attributing them to demographic characteristics (eg, age, sex) was common, as was considering them a side effect of hormonal contraception. When women raised cancer as a possible cause, they often dismissed it as unlikely. Responses to symptoms included self-management (eg, self-medicating, making lifestyle changes), adopting a ‘lay system of care’, or consulting a healthcare professional. Triggers to help-seeking included persistent, painful or debilitating symptoms, concern about symptom seriousness, and feeling that help-seeking was legitimised. Barriers to help-seeking included lack of concern, vague symptoms, unusual symptom location, competing time demands, previous negative experiences with the healthcare system, and not wanting to be perceived as a time-waster. CONCLUSIONS: Attributions of symptoms potentially indicative of a gynaecological cancer were varied, but most often involved women fitting symptoms into their expectations of what was ‘normal’. Normalising acted as a barrier to seeking help from a healthcare professional, alongside competing time demands and negative attitudes towards help-seeking. These barriers may lead to later diagnosis and poorer cancer survival. Our findings could be used to inform the development of interventions to encourage appropriate help-seeking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4499727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44997272015-07-15 Women's interpretation of and responses to potential gynaecological cancer symptoms: a qualitative interview study Low, E L Whitaker, K L Simon, A E Sekhon, M Waller, J BMJ Open Oncology OBJECTIVE: To explore women's experiences of symptoms potentially indicative of gynaecological cancer in a community-based sample without imposing a cancer perspective. DESIGN: A qualitative interview study with thematic analysis of transcripts. PARTICIPANTS: 26 women aged ≥30 years, who had experienced a symptom that might indicate gynaecological cancer in the past 3 months, were recruited using a screening questionnaire distributed online and in community settings. SETTING: London, UK. RESULTS: Women attributed gynaecological symptoms to existing illnesses/conditions or considered themselves to be predisposed to them, either through their ‘genes’ or previous personal experience. Normalising symptoms by attributing them to demographic characteristics (eg, age, sex) was common, as was considering them a side effect of hormonal contraception. When women raised cancer as a possible cause, they often dismissed it as unlikely. Responses to symptoms included self-management (eg, self-medicating, making lifestyle changes), adopting a ‘lay system of care’, or consulting a healthcare professional. Triggers to help-seeking included persistent, painful or debilitating symptoms, concern about symptom seriousness, and feeling that help-seeking was legitimised. Barriers to help-seeking included lack of concern, vague symptoms, unusual symptom location, competing time demands, previous negative experiences with the healthcare system, and not wanting to be perceived as a time-waster. CONCLUSIONS: Attributions of symptoms potentially indicative of a gynaecological cancer were varied, but most often involved women fitting symptoms into their expectations of what was ‘normal’. Normalising acted as a barrier to seeking help from a healthcare professional, alongside competing time demands and negative attitudes towards help-seeking. These barriers may lead to later diagnosis and poorer cancer survival. Our findings could be used to inform the development of interventions to encourage appropriate help-seeking. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4499727/ /pubmed/26150145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008082 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Oncology
Low, E L
Whitaker, K L
Simon, A E
Sekhon, M
Waller, J
Women's interpretation of and responses to potential gynaecological cancer symptoms: a qualitative interview study
title Women's interpretation of and responses to potential gynaecological cancer symptoms: a qualitative interview study
title_full Women's interpretation of and responses to potential gynaecological cancer symptoms: a qualitative interview study
title_fullStr Women's interpretation of and responses to potential gynaecological cancer symptoms: a qualitative interview study
title_full_unstemmed Women's interpretation of and responses to potential gynaecological cancer symptoms: a qualitative interview study
title_short Women's interpretation of and responses to potential gynaecological cancer symptoms: a qualitative interview study
title_sort women's interpretation of and responses to potential gynaecological cancer symptoms: a qualitative interview study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26150145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008082
work_keys_str_mv AT lowel womensinterpretationofandresponsestopotentialgynaecologicalcancersymptomsaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT whitakerkl womensinterpretationofandresponsestopotentialgynaecologicalcancersymptomsaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT simonae womensinterpretationofandresponsestopotentialgynaecologicalcancersymptomsaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT sekhonm womensinterpretationofandresponsestopotentialgynaecologicalcancersymptomsaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT wallerj womensinterpretationofandresponsestopotentialgynaecologicalcancersymptomsaqualitativeinterviewstudy