Cargando…

Occurrence and determinants of selective reporting of clinical drug trials: design of an inception cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Responsible conduct of research implies that results of clinical trials should be completely and adequately reported. This article describes the design of a cohort study that aims to investigate the occurrence and the determinants of selective reporting in an inception cohort of all cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	van den Bogert, Cornelis A, Souverein, Patrick C, Brekelmans, Cecile T M, Janssen, Susan W J, van Hunnik, Manon, Koëter, Gerard H, Leufkens, Hubertus G M, Bouter, Lex M
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:	Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26152325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007827

Ejemplares similares

Non-Publication Is Common among Phase 1, Single-Center, Not Prospectively Registered, or Early Terminated Clinical Drug Trials
por: van den Bogert, Cornelis A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers
por: Tijdink, J K, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study
por: van Lent, Marlies, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
por: Collins, Gary S, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Standardised method for reporting exercise programmes: protocol for a modified Delphi study
por: Slade, Susan C, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Improving the evaluation of worldwide biomedical research output: classification method and standardised bibliometric indicators by disease
por: van de Laar, Lissy, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Does a research article's country of origin affect perception of its quality and relevance? A national trial of US public health researchers
por: Harris, M, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Survey of quality and clarity of methods and results reporting in 1 year of intervention studies published in high-impact medical and psychiatric journals
por: Ravichandran, Caitlin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Primary outcome switching among drug trials with and without principal investigator financial ties to industry: a cross-sectional study
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Causes of reporting bias: a theoretical framework
por: van der Steen, Jenny T, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a systematic review
por: Shahzad, Rida, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration
por: Cohen, Jérémie F, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey
por: Cobey, Kelly D, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Women’s health in The BMJ: a data science history
por: Hamulyák, Eva N, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Reporting of data on participant ethnicity and socioeconomic status in high-impact medical journals: a targeted literature review
por: Buttery, Sara C, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Data sharing through an NIH central database repository: a cross-sectional survey of BioLINCC users
por: Ross, Joseph S, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Gender parity in scientific authorship in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a bibliometric analysis
por: Shah, Syed Ghulam Sarwar, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Methods and results used in the development of a consensus-driven extension to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement for trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (CONSORT-ROUTINE)
por: Imran, Mahrukh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Minocycline for the treatment of mental health and neurological conditions: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Bortolasci, Chiara C, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Assessing the impact of predatory journals on policy and guidance documents: a cross-sectional study protocol
por: Brandts-Longtin, Olivier, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Protocol for a meta-research study of protocols for diet or nutrition-related trials published in indexed journals: general aspects of study design, rationale and reporting limitations
por: Silva, Flávia Moraes, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Fate of manuscripts rejected by a non-English-language general medical journal: a retrospective cohort study
por: Vinther, Siri, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

How often do US-based human subjects research studies register on time, and how often do they post their results? A statistical analysis of the Clinicaltrials.gov database
por: Gill, Christopher J
Publicado: (2012)

Haphazard reporting of deaths in clinical trials: a review of cases of ClinicalTrials.gov records and matched publications–a cross-sectional study
por: Earley, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Systematic review on the primary and secondary reporting of the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature
por: Stretton, Serina
Publicado: (2014)

How does under-reporting of negative and inconclusive results affect the false-positive rate in meta-analysis? A simulation study
por: Kicinski, Michal
Publicado: (2014)

Poor adherence of randomised trials in surgery to CONSORT guidelines for non-pharmacological treatments (NPT): a cross-sectional study
por: Nagendran, Myura, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials
por: Schroter, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey
por: Wager, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study
por: Herbert, Danielle L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Conflict-of-interest disclosure at medical journals in Japan: a nationwide survey of the practices of journal secretariats
por: Kojima, Takako, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A retrospective analysis of the effect of discussion in teleconference and face-to-face scientific peer-review panels
por: Carpenter, Afton S, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study
por: Gattrell, William T, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus
por: Bassler, Dirk, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The impact of a streamlined funding application process on application time: two cross-sectional surveys of Australian researchers
por: Barnett, Adrian G, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Conflicts of interest and spin in reviews of psychological therapies: a systematic review
por: Lieb, Klaus, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis
por: Hays, Meredith, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications in transplantation journals from Mainland China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan between 2006 and 2015
por: Pu, Qiang-Hong, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Assessment of the extent of unpublished studies in prognostic factor research: a systematic review of p53 immunohistochemistry in bladder cancer as an example
por: Sekula, Peggy, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Reporting quality of abstracts of trials published in top five pain journals: a protocol for a systematic survey
por: Sriganesh, Kamath, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_74bfapb9lnda1t1hletjflcr5b