Cargando…
Does accountability for reasonableness work? A protocol for a mixed methods study using an audit tool to evaluate the decision-making of clinical commissioning groups in England
INTRODUCTION: Clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) in England are tasked with making difficult decisions on which healthcare services to provide against the background of limited budgets. The question is how to ensure that these decisions are fair and legitimate. Accounts of what constitutes fair an...
Autores principales: | Kieslich, Katharina, Littlejohns, Peter |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26163034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007908 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Patient and public involvement in priority‐setting decisions in England's Transforming NHS: An interview study with Clinical Commissioning Groups in South London sustainability transformation partnerships
por: Coultas, Clare, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
NHS reforms in England: the implications for chemotherapy commissioning
por: Staines, Carolyn, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Ten years of jointly commissioning health and social care in England
por: Hudson, Bob
Publicado: (2011) -
Engaging the public in healthcare decision-making: quantifying preferences for healthcare through citizens’ juries
por: Scuffham, Paul A, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Points to consider for prioritizing clinical genetic testing services: a European consensus process oriented at accountability for reasonableness
por: Severin, Franziska, et al.
Publicado: (2015)