Cargando…

Split-mouth and parallel-arm trials to compare pain with intraosseous anaesthesia delivered by the computerised Quicksleeper system and conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric oral healthcare: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Local anaesthesia is commonly used in paediatric oral healthcare. Infiltration anaesthesia is the most frequently used, but recent developments in anaesthesia techniques have introduced an alternative: intraosseous anaesthesia. We propose to perform a split-mouth and parallel-arm multi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smaïl-Faugeron, Violaine, Muller-Bolla, Michèle, Sixou, Jean-Louis, Courson, Frédéric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26163031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007724
_version_ 1782380835064774656
author Smaïl-Faugeron, Violaine
Muller-Bolla, Michèle
Sixou, Jean-Louis
Courson, Frédéric
author_facet Smaïl-Faugeron, Violaine
Muller-Bolla, Michèle
Sixou, Jean-Louis
Courson, Frédéric
author_sort Smaïl-Faugeron, Violaine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Local anaesthesia is commonly used in paediatric oral healthcare. Infiltration anaesthesia is the most frequently used, but recent developments in anaesthesia techniques have introduced an alternative: intraosseous anaesthesia. We propose to perform a split-mouth and parallel-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the pain caused by the insertion of the needle for the injection of conventional infiltration anaesthesia, and intraosseous anaesthesia by the computerised QuickSleeper system, in children and adolescents. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Inclusion criteria are patients 7–15 years old with at least 2 first permanent molars belonging to the same dental arch (for the split-mouth RCT) or with a first permanent molar (for the parallel-arm RCT) requiring conservative or endodontic treatment limited to pulpotomy. The setting of this study is the Department of Paediatric Dentistry at 3 University dental hospitals in France. The primary outcome measure will be pain reported by the patient on a visual analogue scale concerning the insertion of the needle and the injection/infiltration. Secondary outcomes are latency, need for additional anaesthesia during the treatment and pain felt during the treatment. We will use a computer-generated permuted-block randomisation sequence for allocation to anaesthesia groups. The random sequences will be stratified by centre (and by dental arch for the parallel-arm RCT). Only participants will be blinded to group assignment. Data will be analysed by the intent-to-treat principle. In all, 160 patients will be included (30 in the split-mouth RCT, 130 in the parallel-arm RCT). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the French ethics committee for the protection of people (Comité de Protection des Personnes, Ile de France I) and will be conducted in full accordance with accepted ethical principles. Findings will be reported in scientific publications and at research conferences, and in project summary papers for participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02084433.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4499744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44997442015-07-15 Split-mouth and parallel-arm trials to compare pain with intraosseous anaesthesia delivered by the computerised Quicksleeper system and conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric oral healthcare: protocol for a randomised controlled trial Smaïl-Faugeron, Violaine Muller-Bolla, Michèle Sixou, Jean-Louis Courson, Frédéric BMJ Open Anaesthesia INTRODUCTION: Local anaesthesia is commonly used in paediatric oral healthcare. Infiltration anaesthesia is the most frequently used, but recent developments in anaesthesia techniques have introduced an alternative: intraosseous anaesthesia. We propose to perform a split-mouth and parallel-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the pain caused by the insertion of the needle for the injection of conventional infiltration anaesthesia, and intraosseous anaesthesia by the computerised QuickSleeper system, in children and adolescents. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Inclusion criteria are patients 7–15 years old with at least 2 first permanent molars belonging to the same dental arch (for the split-mouth RCT) or with a first permanent molar (for the parallel-arm RCT) requiring conservative or endodontic treatment limited to pulpotomy. The setting of this study is the Department of Paediatric Dentistry at 3 University dental hospitals in France. The primary outcome measure will be pain reported by the patient on a visual analogue scale concerning the insertion of the needle and the injection/infiltration. Secondary outcomes are latency, need for additional anaesthesia during the treatment and pain felt during the treatment. We will use a computer-generated permuted-block randomisation sequence for allocation to anaesthesia groups. The random sequences will be stratified by centre (and by dental arch for the parallel-arm RCT). Only participants will be blinded to group assignment. Data will be analysed by the intent-to-treat principle. In all, 160 patients will be included (30 in the split-mouth RCT, 130 in the parallel-arm RCT). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the French ethics committee for the protection of people (Comité de Protection des Personnes, Ile de France I) and will be conducted in full accordance with accepted ethical principles. Findings will be reported in scientific publications and at research conferences, and in project summary papers for participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02084433. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4499744/ /pubmed/26163031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007724 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Anaesthesia
Smaïl-Faugeron, Violaine
Muller-Bolla, Michèle
Sixou, Jean-Louis
Courson, Frédéric
Split-mouth and parallel-arm trials to compare pain with intraosseous anaesthesia delivered by the computerised Quicksleeper system and conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric oral healthcare: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Split-mouth and parallel-arm trials to compare pain with intraosseous anaesthesia delivered by the computerised Quicksleeper system and conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric oral healthcare: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Split-mouth and parallel-arm trials to compare pain with intraosseous anaesthesia delivered by the computerised Quicksleeper system and conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric oral healthcare: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Split-mouth and parallel-arm trials to compare pain with intraosseous anaesthesia delivered by the computerised Quicksleeper system and conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric oral healthcare: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Split-mouth and parallel-arm trials to compare pain with intraosseous anaesthesia delivered by the computerised Quicksleeper system and conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric oral healthcare: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Split-mouth and parallel-arm trials to compare pain with intraosseous anaesthesia delivered by the computerised Quicksleeper system and conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric oral healthcare: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort split-mouth and parallel-arm trials to compare pain with intraosseous anaesthesia delivered by the computerised quicksleeper system and conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric oral healthcare: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26163031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007724
work_keys_str_mv AT smailfaugeronviolaine splitmouthandparallelarmtrialstocomparepainwithintraosseousanaesthesiadeliveredbythecomputerisedquicksleepersystemandconventionalinfiltrationanaesthesiainpaediatricoralhealthcareprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mullerbollamichele splitmouthandparallelarmtrialstocomparepainwithintraosseousanaesthesiadeliveredbythecomputerisedquicksleepersystemandconventionalinfiltrationanaesthesiainpaediatricoralhealthcareprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sixoujeanlouis splitmouthandparallelarmtrialstocomparepainwithintraosseousanaesthesiadeliveredbythecomputerisedquicksleepersystemandconventionalinfiltrationanaesthesiainpaediatricoralhealthcareprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT coursonfrederic splitmouthandparallelarmtrialstocomparepainwithintraosseousanaesthesiadeliveredbythecomputerisedquicksleepersystemandconventionalinfiltrationanaesthesiainpaediatricoralhealthcareprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial