Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of first-line erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer unsuitable for chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of erlotinib versus supportive care (placebo) overall and within a predefined rash subgroup in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who are unfit for chemotherapy and receive only active supportive care due to their poor performance st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Iftekhar, Morris, Stephen, Hackshaw, Allan, Lee, Siow-Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26137881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006733
_version_ 1782380835308044288
author Khan, Iftekhar
Morris, Stephen
Hackshaw, Allan
Lee, Siow-Ming
author_facet Khan, Iftekhar
Morris, Stephen
Hackshaw, Allan
Lee, Siow-Ming
author_sort Khan, Iftekhar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of erlotinib versus supportive care (placebo) overall and within a predefined rash subgroup in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who are unfit for chemotherapy and receive only active supportive care due to their poor performance status or presence of comorbidities. SETTING: Between 2005 and 2009, a total of 670 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomised across 78 hospital sites (centres) in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 670 patients with pathologically confirmed stage IIIb-IV NSCLC, unfit for chemotherapy, predominantly poor performance status (>2 on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, ECOG) and estimated life expectancy of at least 8 weeks. Patients were followed until disease progression or death, including a subgroup of patients who developed first cycle rash. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive best supportive care plus oral placebo or erlotinib (150 mg/day) until disease progression, toxicity or death. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Overall survival (OS). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Progression-free survival (PFS), tumour response and quality adjusted life years (QALY), including within prespecified subgroups. RESULTS: The mean incremental cost per QALY in all patients was £202 571/QALY. The probability of cost-effectiveness of erlotinib in all patients was <10% at thresholds up to £100 000. However, within the rash subgroup, the incremental cost/QALY was £56 770/QALY with a probability of cost-effectiveness of about 80% for cost-effectiveness thresholds between £50 000 to £60 000. CONCLUSIONS: Erlotinib has about 80% chance of being cost-effective at thresholds between £50 000–£60 000 in a subset of elderly poor performance patients with NSCLC unfit for chemotherapy who develop first cycle (28 days) rash. Erlotinib is potentially cost-effective for this population, for which few treatment options apart from best supportive care are available. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: (ISCRTN): 77383050.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4499745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44997452015-07-15 Cost-effectiveness of first-line erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer unsuitable for chemotherapy Khan, Iftekhar Morris, Stephen Hackshaw, Allan Lee, Siow-Ming BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of erlotinib versus supportive care (placebo) overall and within a predefined rash subgroup in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who are unfit for chemotherapy and receive only active supportive care due to their poor performance status or presence of comorbidities. SETTING: Between 2005 and 2009, a total of 670 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomised across 78 hospital sites (centres) in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 670 patients with pathologically confirmed stage IIIb-IV NSCLC, unfit for chemotherapy, predominantly poor performance status (>2 on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, ECOG) and estimated life expectancy of at least 8 weeks. Patients were followed until disease progression or death, including a subgroup of patients who developed first cycle rash. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive best supportive care plus oral placebo or erlotinib (150 mg/day) until disease progression, toxicity or death. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Overall survival (OS). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Progression-free survival (PFS), tumour response and quality adjusted life years (QALY), including within prespecified subgroups. RESULTS: The mean incremental cost per QALY in all patients was £202 571/QALY. The probability of cost-effectiveness of erlotinib in all patients was <10% at thresholds up to £100 000. However, within the rash subgroup, the incremental cost/QALY was £56 770/QALY with a probability of cost-effectiveness of about 80% for cost-effectiveness thresholds between £50 000 to £60 000. CONCLUSIONS: Erlotinib has about 80% chance of being cost-effective at thresholds between £50 000–£60 000 in a subset of elderly poor performance patients with NSCLC unfit for chemotherapy who develop first cycle (28 days) rash. Erlotinib is potentially cost-effective for this population, for which few treatment options apart from best supportive care are available. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: (ISCRTN): 77383050. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4499745/ /pubmed/26137881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006733 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Economics
Khan, Iftekhar
Morris, Stephen
Hackshaw, Allan
Lee, Siow-Ming
Cost-effectiveness of first-line erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer unsuitable for chemotherapy
title Cost-effectiveness of first-line erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer unsuitable for chemotherapy
title_full Cost-effectiveness of first-line erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer unsuitable for chemotherapy
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of first-line erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer unsuitable for chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of first-line erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer unsuitable for chemotherapy
title_short Cost-effectiveness of first-line erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer unsuitable for chemotherapy
title_sort cost-effectiveness of first-line erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer unsuitable for chemotherapy
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26137881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006733
work_keys_str_mv AT khaniftekhar costeffectivenessoffirstlineerlotinibinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerunsuitableforchemotherapy
AT morrisstephen costeffectivenessoffirstlineerlotinibinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerunsuitableforchemotherapy
AT hackshawallan costeffectivenessoffirstlineerlotinibinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerunsuitableforchemotherapy
AT leesiowming costeffectivenessoffirstlineerlotinibinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerunsuitableforchemotherapy