Cargando…

High prevalence of rectal gonorrhoea among men reporting contact with men with gonorrhoea: Implications for epidemiological treatment

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of gonorrhoea and factors associated with rectal gonorrhoea among men reporting sexual contact with men with gonorrhoea. METHODS: Men who presented to Melbourne Sexual Health Centre reporting sexual contact with a male with gonorrhoea were pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dutt, Krishneel, Chow, Eric P.F., Huffam, Sarah, Klassen, Karen, Fairley, Christopher K., Bradshaw, Catriona S, Denham, Ian, Chen, Marcus Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1971-3
_version_ 1782380854068117504
author Dutt, Krishneel
Chow, Eric P.F.
Huffam, Sarah
Klassen, Karen
Fairley, Christopher K.
Bradshaw, Catriona S
Denham, Ian
Chen, Marcus Y.
author_facet Dutt, Krishneel
Chow, Eric P.F.
Huffam, Sarah
Klassen, Karen
Fairley, Christopher K.
Bradshaw, Catriona S
Denham, Ian
Chen, Marcus Y.
author_sort Dutt, Krishneel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of gonorrhoea and factors associated with rectal gonorrhoea among men reporting sexual contact with men with gonorrhoea. METHODS: Men who presented to Melbourne Sexual Health Centre reporting sexual contact with a male with gonorrhoea were prospectively identified between March 2011 and December 2013. These men were screened for pharyngeal and rectal gonorrhoea using culture. The prevalence of gonorrhoea among contacts was compared to that among all men who have sex with men (MSM) screened at the clinic over the same period. RESULTS: Among 363 contacts of gonorrhoea the prevalence of rectal gonorrhoea was 26.4 % (95 % CI: 21.8 %-31.0 %) compared to 3.9 % (95 % CI: 3.7 %-4.2 %) among clinic attendees (p < 0.001). The prevalence of pharyngeal gonorrhoea among contacts was 9.4 % (95 % CI: 6.4 %-12.4 %) compared to 2.1 % (95 % CI: 1.9 %-2.4 %) among clinic attendees (p < 0.001). Among contacts who reported not always using condoms during receptive anal sex with casual partners, rectal gonorrhoea was cultured in 42.4 % compared with 12.7 % among contacts reporting no receptive anal sex (p < 0.001) and 20.2 % among those reporting always using condoms (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis rectal gonorrhoea was associated with inconsistent condom use during receptive anal sex with casual partners (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 4.16; 95 % CI: 1.87-9.26) and a reported past history of gonorrhoea (AOR: 1.77; 95 % CI: 1.01-3.14). CONCLUSIONS: The high proportion of positive cases of gonorrhoea among contacts in this study supports epidemiological treatment of MSM presenting as contacts of gonorrhoea.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4499909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44999092015-07-14 High prevalence of rectal gonorrhoea among men reporting contact with men with gonorrhoea: Implications for epidemiological treatment Dutt, Krishneel Chow, Eric P.F. Huffam, Sarah Klassen, Karen Fairley, Christopher K. Bradshaw, Catriona S Denham, Ian Chen, Marcus Y. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of gonorrhoea and factors associated with rectal gonorrhoea among men reporting sexual contact with men with gonorrhoea. METHODS: Men who presented to Melbourne Sexual Health Centre reporting sexual contact with a male with gonorrhoea were prospectively identified between March 2011 and December 2013. These men were screened for pharyngeal and rectal gonorrhoea using culture. The prevalence of gonorrhoea among contacts was compared to that among all men who have sex with men (MSM) screened at the clinic over the same period. RESULTS: Among 363 contacts of gonorrhoea the prevalence of rectal gonorrhoea was 26.4 % (95 % CI: 21.8 %-31.0 %) compared to 3.9 % (95 % CI: 3.7 %-4.2 %) among clinic attendees (p < 0.001). The prevalence of pharyngeal gonorrhoea among contacts was 9.4 % (95 % CI: 6.4 %-12.4 %) compared to 2.1 % (95 % CI: 1.9 %-2.4 %) among clinic attendees (p < 0.001). Among contacts who reported not always using condoms during receptive anal sex with casual partners, rectal gonorrhoea was cultured in 42.4 % compared with 12.7 % among contacts reporting no receptive anal sex (p < 0.001) and 20.2 % among those reporting always using condoms (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis rectal gonorrhoea was associated with inconsistent condom use during receptive anal sex with casual partners (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 4.16; 95 % CI: 1.87-9.26) and a reported past history of gonorrhoea (AOR: 1.77; 95 % CI: 1.01-3.14). CONCLUSIONS: The high proportion of positive cases of gonorrhoea among contacts in this study supports epidemiological treatment of MSM presenting as contacts of gonorrhoea. BioMed Central 2015-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4499909/ /pubmed/26170131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1971-3 Text en © Dutt et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dutt, Krishneel
Chow, Eric P.F.
Huffam, Sarah
Klassen, Karen
Fairley, Christopher K.
Bradshaw, Catriona S
Denham, Ian
Chen, Marcus Y.
High prevalence of rectal gonorrhoea among men reporting contact with men with gonorrhoea: Implications for epidemiological treatment
title High prevalence of rectal gonorrhoea among men reporting contact with men with gonorrhoea: Implications for epidemiological treatment
title_full High prevalence of rectal gonorrhoea among men reporting contact with men with gonorrhoea: Implications for epidemiological treatment
title_fullStr High prevalence of rectal gonorrhoea among men reporting contact with men with gonorrhoea: Implications for epidemiological treatment
title_full_unstemmed High prevalence of rectal gonorrhoea among men reporting contact with men with gonorrhoea: Implications for epidemiological treatment
title_short High prevalence of rectal gonorrhoea among men reporting contact with men with gonorrhoea: Implications for epidemiological treatment
title_sort high prevalence of rectal gonorrhoea among men reporting contact with men with gonorrhoea: implications for epidemiological treatment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1971-3
work_keys_str_mv AT duttkrishneel highprevalenceofrectalgonorrhoeaamongmenreportingcontactwithmenwithgonorrhoeaimplicationsforepidemiologicaltreatment
AT chowericpf highprevalenceofrectalgonorrhoeaamongmenreportingcontactwithmenwithgonorrhoeaimplicationsforepidemiologicaltreatment
AT huffamsarah highprevalenceofrectalgonorrhoeaamongmenreportingcontactwithmenwithgonorrhoeaimplicationsforepidemiologicaltreatment
AT klassenkaren highprevalenceofrectalgonorrhoeaamongmenreportingcontactwithmenwithgonorrhoeaimplicationsforepidemiologicaltreatment
AT fairleychristopherk highprevalenceofrectalgonorrhoeaamongmenreportingcontactwithmenwithgonorrhoeaimplicationsforepidemiologicaltreatment
AT bradshawcatrionas highprevalenceofrectalgonorrhoeaamongmenreportingcontactwithmenwithgonorrhoeaimplicationsforepidemiologicaltreatment
AT denhamian highprevalenceofrectalgonorrhoeaamongmenreportingcontactwithmenwithgonorrhoeaimplicationsforepidemiologicaltreatment
AT chenmarcusy highprevalenceofrectalgonorrhoeaamongmenreportingcontactwithmenwithgonorrhoeaimplicationsforepidemiologicaltreatment