Cargando…

Capnography monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND: An important potential clinical benefit of using capnography monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is that this technology could improve patient safety by reducing serious sedation-related adverse events, such as death or permanent neurological disability, which are c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conway, Aaron, Douglas, Clint, Sutherland, Joanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0085-4
_version_ 1782380854525296640
author Conway, Aaron
Douglas, Clint
Sutherland, Joanna
author_facet Conway, Aaron
Douglas, Clint
Sutherland, Joanna
author_sort Conway, Aaron
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An important potential clinical benefit of using capnography monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is that this technology could improve patient safety by reducing serious sedation-related adverse events, such as death or permanent neurological disability, which are caused by inadequate oxygenation. The hypothesis is that earlier identification of respiratory depression using capnography leads to a change in clinical management that prevents hypoxaemia. As inadequate oxygenation/ventilation is the most common reason for injury associated with PSA, reducing episodes of hypoxaemia would indicate that using capnography would be safer than relying on standard monitoring alone. METHODS/DESIGN: The primary objective of this review is to determine whether using capnography during PSA in the hospital setting improves patient safety by reducing the risk of hypoxaemia (defined as an arterial partial pressure of oxygen below 60 mmHg or percentage of haemoglobin that is saturated with oxygen [SpO(2)] less than 90 %). A secondary objective of this review is to determine whether changes in the clinical management of sedated patients are the mediating factor for any observed impact of capnography monitoring on the rate of hypoxaemia. The potential adverse effect of capnography monitoring that will be examined in this review is the rate of inadequate sedation. Electronic databases will be searched for parallel, crossover and cluster randomised controlled trials comparing the use of capnography with standard monitoring alone during PSA that is administered in the hospital setting. Studies that included patients who received general or regional anaesthesia will be excluded from the review. Non-randomised studies will be excluded. Screening, study selection and data extraction will be performed by two reviewers. The Cochrane risk of bias tool will be used to assign a judgment about the degree of risk. Meta-analyses will be performed if suitable. DISCUSSION: This review will synthesise the evidence on an important potential clinical benefit of capnography monitoring during PSA within hospital settings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015023740 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0085-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4499911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44999112015-07-14 Capnography monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia: a systematic review protocol Conway, Aaron Douglas, Clint Sutherland, Joanna Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: An important potential clinical benefit of using capnography monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is that this technology could improve patient safety by reducing serious sedation-related adverse events, such as death or permanent neurological disability, which are caused by inadequate oxygenation. The hypothesis is that earlier identification of respiratory depression using capnography leads to a change in clinical management that prevents hypoxaemia. As inadequate oxygenation/ventilation is the most common reason for injury associated with PSA, reducing episodes of hypoxaemia would indicate that using capnography would be safer than relying on standard monitoring alone. METHODS/DESIGN: The primary objective of this review is to determine whether using capnography during PSA in the hospital setting improves patient safety by reducing the risk of hypoxaemia (defined as an arterial partial pressure of oxygen below 60 mmHg or percentage of haemoglobin that is saturated with oxygen [SpO(2)] less than 90 %). A secondary objective of this review is to determine whether changes in the clinical management of sedated patients are the mediating factor for any observed impact of capnography monitoring on the rate of hypoxaemia. The potential adverse effect of capnography monitoring that will be examined in this review is the rate of inadequate sedation. Electronic databases will be searched for parallel, crossover and cluster randomised controlled trials comparing the use of capnography with standard monitoring alone during PSA that is administered in the hospital setting. Studies that included patients who received general or regional anaesthesia will be excluded from the review. Non-randomised studies will be excluded. Screening, study selection and data extraction will be performed by two reviewers. The Cochrane risk of bias tool will be used to assign a judgment about the degree of risk. Meta-analyses will be performed if suitable. DISCUSSION: This review will synthesise the evidence on an important potential clinical benefit of capnography monitoring during PSA within hospital settings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015023740 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0085-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4499911/ /pubmed/26170128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0085-4 Text en © Conway et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Conway, Aaron
Douglas, Clint
Sutherland, Joanna
Capnography monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia: a systematic review protocol
title Capnography monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia: a systematic review protocol
title_full Capnography monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Capnography monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Capnography monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia: a systematic review protocol
title_short Capnography monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia: a systematic review protocol
title_sort capnography monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia: a systematic review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0085-4
work_keys_str_mv AT conwayaaron capnographymonitoringduringproceduralsedationandanalgesiaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT douglasclint capnographymonitoringduringproceduralsedationandanalgesiaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT sutherlandjoanna capnographymonitoringduringproceduralsedationandanalgesiaasystematicreviewprotocol