Cargando…

Monitoring and assessing the quality of care for youth: developing an audit tool using an expert consensus approach

BACKGROUND: The mental health needs of young people are often inadequately met by health services. Quality improvement approaches provide a framework for measuring, assessing and improving the quality of healthcare. However, a lack of performance standards and measurement tools are an impediment to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puszka, Stefanie, Nagel, Tricia, Matthews, Veronica, Mosca, Diana, Piovesan, Rebecca, Nori, Annapurna, Bailie, Ross
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13033-015-0019-5
_version_ 1782380854757031936
author Puszka, Stefanie
Nagel, Tricia
Matthews, Veronica
Mosca, Diana
Piovesan, Rebecca
Nori, Annapurna
Bailie, Ross
author_facet Puszka, Stefanie
Nagel, Tricia
Matthews, Veronica
Mosca, Diana
Piovesan, Rebecca
Nori, Annapurna
Bailie, Ross
author_sort Puszka, Stefanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The mental health needs of young people are often inadequately met by health services. Quality improvement approaches provide a framework for measuring, assessing and improving the quality of healthcare. However, a lack of performance standards and measurement tools are an impediment to their implementation. This paper reports on the initial stages of development of a clinical audit tool for assessing the quality of primary healthcare for Australian Indigenous youth aged 12–24 including mental health services provided within primary care. METHODS: Audit items were determined through review of relevant guidelines, expert reference group consensus opinion and specific inclusion criteria. Pilot testing was undertaken at four Indigenous primary healthcare services. A focus group discussion involving five staff from a health service participating in pilot testing explored user experiences of the tool. RESULTS: Audit items comprise key measures of processes and outcomes of care for Indigenous youth, as determined by the expert reference group. Gaps and conflicts in relevant guidelines and a lack of agreed performance indicators necessitated a tool development process that relied heavily on expert reference group advice and audit item inclusion criteria. Pilot testing and user feedback highlighted the importance of feasibility and context-specific considerations in tool development and design. CONCLUSIONS: The youth health audit tool provides a first step in monitoring, assessing and improving the way Indigenous primary healthcare services engage with and respond to the needs of youth. Our approach offers a way forward for further development of quality measures in the absence of clearly articulated standards of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4499912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44999122015-07-14 Monitoring and assessing the quality of care for youth: developing an audit tool using an expert consensus approach Puszka, Stefanie Nagel, Tricia Matthews, Veronica Mosca, Diana Piovesan, Rebecca Nori, Annapurna Bailie, Ross Int J Ment Health Syst Research BACKGROUND: The mental health needs of young people are often inadequately met by health services. Quality improvement approaches provide a framework for measuring, assessing and improving the quality of healthcare. However, a lack of performance standards and measurement tools are an impediment to their implementation. This paper reports on the initial stages of development of a clinical audit tool for assessing the quality of primary healthcare for Australian Indigenous youth aged 12–24 including mental health services provided within primary care. METHODS: Audit items were determined through review of relevant guidelines, expert reference group consensus opinion and specific inclusion criteria. Pilot testing was undertaken at four Indigenous primary healthcare services. A focus group discussion involving five staff from a health service participating in pilot testing explored user experiences of the tool. RESULTS: Audit items comprise key measures of processes and outcomes of care for Indigenous youth, as determined by the expert reference group. Gaps and conflicts in relevant guidelines and a lack of agreed performance indicators necessitated a tool development process that relied heavily on expert reference group advice and audit item inclusion criteria. Pilot testing and user feedback highlighted the importance of feasibility and context-specific considerations in tool development and design. CONCLUSIONS: The youth health audit tool provides a first step in monitoring, assessing and improving the way Indigenous primary healthcare services engage with and respond to the needs of youth. Our approach offers a way forward for further development of quality measures in the absence of clearly articulated standards of care. BioMed Central 2015-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4499912/ /pubmed/26170899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13033-015-0019-5 Text en © Puszka et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Puszka, Stefanie
Nagel, Tricia
Matthews, Veronica
Mosca, Diana
Piovesan, Rebecca
Nori, Annapurna
Bailie, Ross
Monitoring and assessing the quality of care for youth: developing an audit tool using an expert consensus approach
title Monitoring and assessing the quality of care for youth: developing an audit tool using an expert consensus approach
title_full Monitoring and assessing the quality of care for youth: developing an audit tool using an expert consensus approach
title_fullStr Monitoring and assessing the quality of care for youth: developing an audit tool using an expert consensus approach
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring and assessing the quality of care for youth: developing an audit tool using an expert consensus approach
title_short Monitoring and assessing the quality of care for youth: developing an audit tool using an expert consensus approach
title_sort monitoring and assessing the quality of care for youth: developing an audit tool using an expert consensus approach
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13033-015-0019-5
work_keys_str_mv AT puszkastefanie monitoringandassessingthequalityofcareforyouthdevelopinganaudittoolusinganexpertconsensusapproach
AT nageltricia monitoringandassessingthequalityofcareforyouthdevelopinganaudittoolusinganexpertconsensusapproach
AT matthewsveronica monitoringandassessingthequalityofcareforyouthdevelopinganaudittoolusinganexpertconsensusapproach
AT moscadiana monitoringandassessingthequalityofcareforyouthdevelopinganaudittoolusinganexpertconsensusapproach
AT piovesanrebecca monitoringandassessingthequalityofcareforyouthdevelopinganaudittoolusinganexpertconsensusapproach
AT noriannapurna monitoringandassessingthequalityofcareforyouthdevelopinganaudittoolusinganexpertconsensusapproach
AT bailieross monitoringandassessingthequalityofcareforyouthdevelopinganaudittoolusinganexpertconsensusapproach