Cargando…
The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of the Turkish version
[Purpose] Currently, there are a limited number of amputee-specific instruments for measuring prosthesis-related quality of life with good psychometric properties in Turkey. This study translated the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire to Turkish and analyzed as well as discussed its construct valid...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26180296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.1677 |
_version_ | 1782380865399029760 |
---|---|
author | Safer, Vildan Binay Yavuzer, Gunes Demir, Sibel Ozbudak Yanikoglu, Inci Guneri, Fulya Demircioglu |
author_facet | Safer, Vildan Binay Yavuzer, Gunes Demir, Sibel Ozbudak Yanikoglu, Inci Guneri, Fulya Demircioglu |
author_sort | Safer, Vildan Binay |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Purpose] Currently, there are a limited number of amputee-specific instruments for measuring prosthesis-related quality of life with good psychometric properties in Turkey. This study translated the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire to Turkish and analyzed as well as discussed its construct validity and internal consistency. [Subjects and Methods] The Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire was adapted for use in Turkish by forward/backward translation. The final Turkish version of this questionnaire was administered to 90 unilateral amputee patients. Second evaluation was possible in 83 participants within a median 28 day time period. [Results] Point estimates for the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.69 to 0.89 for all 9 Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire scales, indicating good correlation. Overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged from 0.64 to 0.92, except for the perceived response subscale of 0.39. The ambulation subscale was correlated with the physical functioning subscales of Short Form-36 (SF-36) (r=0.48). The social burden subscale score of the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire was correlated with social functioning subscales of SF-36 (r= 0.63). [Conclusion] The Turkish version of the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for implementation in the Turkish unilateral amputee population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4499959 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44999592015-07-15 The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of the Turkish version Safer, Vildan Binay Yavuzer, Gunes Demir, Sibel Ozbudak Yanikoglu, Inci Guneri, Fulya Demircioglu J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] Currently, there are a limited number of amputee-specific instruments for measuring prosthesis-related quality of life with good psychometric properties in Turkey. This study translated the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire to Turkish and analyzed as well as discussed its construct validity and internal consistency. [Subjects and Methods] The Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire was adapted for use in Turkish by forward/backward translation. The final Turkish version of this questionnaire was administered to 90 unilateral amputee patients. Second evaluation was possible in 83 participants within a median 28 day time period. [Results] Point estimates for the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.69 to 0.89 for all 9 Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire scales, indicating good correlation. Overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged from 0.64 to 0.92, except for the perceived response subscale of 0.39. The ambulation subscale was correlated with the physical functioning subscales of Short Form-36 (SF-36) (r=0.48). The social burden subscale score of the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire was correlated with social functioning subscales of SF-36 (r= 0.63). [Conclusion] The Turkish version of the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for implementation in the Turkish unilateral amputee population. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015-06-30 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4499959/ /pubmed/26180296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.1677 Text en 2015©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Safer, Vildan Binay Yavuzer, Gunes Demir, Sibel Ozbudak Yanikoglu, Inci Guneri, Fulya Demircioglu The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of the Turkish version |
title | The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of
the Turkish version |
title_full | The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of
the Turkish version |
title_fullStr | The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of
the Turkish version |
title_full_unstemmed | The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of
the Turkish version |
title_short | The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of
the Turkish version |
title_sort | prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of
the turkish version |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26180296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.1677 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safervildanbinay theprosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion AT yavuzergunes theprosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion AT demirsibelozbudak theprosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion AT yanikogluinci theprosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion AT gunerifulyademircioglu theprosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion AT safervildanbinay prosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion AT yavuzergunes prosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion AT demirsibelozbudak prosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion AT yanikogluinci prosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion AT gunerifulyademircioglu prosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion |