Cargando…

The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of the Turkish version

[Purpose] Currently, there are a limited number of amputee-specific instruments for measuring prosthesis-related quality of life with good psychometric properties in Turkey. This study translated the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire to Turkish and analyzed as well as discussed its construct valid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Safer, Vildan Binay, Yavuzer, Gunes, Demir, Sibel Ozbudak, Yanikoglu, Inci, Guneri, Fulya Demircioglu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26180296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.1677
_version_ 1782380865399029760
author Safer, Vildan Binay
Yavuzer, Gunes
Demir, Sibel Ozbudak
Yanikoglu, Inci
Guneri, Fulya Demircioglu
author_facet Safer, Vildan Binay
Yavuzer, Gunes
Demir, Sibel Ozbudak
Yanikoglu, Inci
Guneri, Fulya Demircioglu
author_sort Safer, Vildan Binay
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] Currently, there are a limited number of amputee-specific instruments for measuring prosthesis-related quality of life with good psychometric properties in Turkey. This study translated the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire to Turkish and analyzed as well as discussed its construct validity and internal consistency. [Subjects and Methods] The Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire was adapted for use in Turkish by forward/backward translation. The final Turkish version of this questionnaire was administered to 90 unilateral amputee patients. Second evaluation was possible in 83 participants within a median 28 day time period. [Results] Point estimates for the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.69 to 0.89 for all 9 Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire scales, indicating good correlation. Overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged from 0.64 to 0.92, except for the perceived response subscale of 0.39. The ambulation subscale was correlated with the physical functioning subscales of Short Form-36 (SF-36) (r=0.48). The social burden subscale score of the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire was correlated with social functioning subscales of SF-36 (r= 0.63). [Conclusion] The Turkish version of the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for implementation in the Turkish unilateral amputee population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4499959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44999592015-07-15 The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of the Turkish version Safer, Vildan Binay Yavuzer, Gunes Demir, Sibel Ozbudak Yanikoglu, Inci Guneri, Fulya Demircioglu J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] Currently, there are a limited number of amputee-specific instruments for measuring prosthesis-related quality of life with good psychometric properties in Turkey. This study translated the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire to Turkish and analyzed as well as discussed its construct validity and internal consistency. [Subjects and Methods] The Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire was adapted for use in Turkish by forward/backward translation. The final Turkish version of this questionnaire was administered to 90 unilateral amputee patients. Second evaluation was possible in 83 participants within a median 28 day time period. [Results] Point estimates for the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.69 to 0.89 for all 9 Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire scales, indicating good correlation. Overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged from 0.64 to 0.92, except for the perceived response subscale of 0.39. The ambulation subscale was correlated with the physical functioning subscales of Short Form-36 (SF-36) (r=0.48). The social burden subscale score of the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire was correlated with social functioning subscales of SF-36 (r= 0.63). [Conclusion] The Turkish version of the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for implementation in the Turkish unilateral amputee population. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015-06-30 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4499959/ /pubmed/26180296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.1677 Text en 2015©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Safer, Vildan Binay
Yavuzer, Gunes
Demir, Sibel Ozbudak
Yanikoglu, Inci
Guneri, Fulya Demircioglu
The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of the Turkish version
title The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of the Turkish version
title_full The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of the Turkish version
title_fullStr The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of the Turkish version
title_full_unstemmed The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of the Turkish version
title_short The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of the Turkish version
title_sort prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of the turkish version
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26180296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.1677
work_keys_str_mv AT safervildanbinay theprosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion
AT yavuzergunes theprosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion
AT demirsibelozbudak theprosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion
AT yanikogluinci theprosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion
AT gunerifulyademircioglu theprosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion
AT safervildanbinay prosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion
AT yavuzergunes prosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion
AT demirsibelozbudak prosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion
AT yanikogluinci prosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion
AT gunerifulyademircioglu prosthesisevaluationquestionnairereliabilityandcrossvalidationoftheturkishversion