Cargando…
Do Laboratory Results Concerning High-Viscosity Glass-Ionomers versus Amalgam for Tooth Restorations Indicate Similar Effect Direction and Magnitude than that of Controlled Clinical Trials? - A Meta-Epidemiological Study
BACKGROUND: A large percentage of evidence concerning dental interventions is based on laboratory research. The apparent wealth of laboratory evidence is sometimes used as basis for clinical inference and recommendations for daily dental practice. In this study two null-hypotheses are tested: whethe...
Autores principales: | Mickenautsch, Steffen, Yengopal, Veerasamy |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4500394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26168274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132246 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam restorations: An update of systematic review evidence
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Failure Rate of Direct High-Viscosity Glass-Ionomer Versus Hybrid Resin Composite Restorations in Posterior Permanent Teeth - a Systematic Review
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Direct Contra Naïve-Indirect Comparison of Clinical Failure Rates between High-Viscosity GIC and Conventional Amalgam Restorations: An Empirical Study
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Caries-Preventive Effect of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer and Resin-Based Fissure Sealants on Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Are high-viscosity glass-ionomer cements inferior to silver amalgam as restorative materials for permanent posterior teeth? A Bayesian analysis
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen
Publicado: (2015)