Cargando…
Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age
OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare outcomes from in-patient rehabilitation (IPR) in working-aged adults across different groups of long-term neurological conditions, as defined by the UK National Service Framework. DESIGN: Analysis of a large Australian prospectively collected dataset for completed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4500577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26167877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132275 |
_version_ | 1782380935272988672 |
---|---|
author | Turner-Stokes, Lynne Vanderstay, Roxana Stevermuer, Tara Simmonds, Frances Khan, Fary Eagar, Kathy |
author_facet | Turner-Stokes, Lynne Vanderstay, Roxana Stevermuer, Tara Simmonds, Frances Khan, Fary Eagar, Kathy |
author_sort | Turner-Stokes, Lynne |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare outcomes from in-patient rehabilitation (IPR) in working-aged adults across different groups of long-term neurological conditions, as defined by the UK National Service Framework. DESIGN: Analysis of a large Australian prospectively collected dataset for completed IPR episodes (n = 28,596) from 2003-2012. METHODS: De-identified data for adults (16–65 years) with specified neurological impairment codes were extracted, cleaned and divided into ‘Sudden-onset’ conditions: (Stroke (n = 12527), brain injury (n = 7565), spinal cord injury (SCI) (n = 3753), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) (n = 805)) and ‘Progressive/stable’ conditions (Progressive (n = 3750) and Cerebral palsy (n = 196)). Key outcomes included Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, length of stay (LOS), and discharge destination. RESULTS: Mean LOS ranged from 21–57 days with significant group differences in gender, source of admission and discharge destination. All six groups showed significant change (p<0.001) between admission and discharge that was likely to be clinically important across a range of items. Significant between-group differences were observed for FIM Motor and Cognitive change scores (Kruskal-Wallis p<0.001), and item-by-item analysis confirmed distinct patterns for each of the six groups. SCI and GBS patients were generally at the ceiling of the cognitive subscale. The ‘Progressive/stable’ conditions made smaller improvements in FIM score than the ‘Sudden-onset conditions’, but also had shorter LOS. CONCLUSION: All groups made gains in independence during admission, although pattern of change varied between conditions, and ceiling effects were observed in the FIM-cognitive subscale. Relative cost-efficiency between groups can only be indirectly inferred. Limitations of the current dataset are discussed, together with opportunities for expansion and further development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4500577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45005772015-07-17 Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age Turner-Stokes, Lynne Vanderstay, Roxana Stevermuer, Tara Simmonds, Frances Khan, Fary Eagar, Kathy PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare outcomes from in-patient rehabilitation (IPR) in working-aged adults across different groups of long-term neurological conditions, as defined by the UK National Service Framework. DESIGN: Analysis of a large Australian prospectively collected dataset for completed IPR episodes (n = 28,596) from 2003-2012. METHODS: De-identified data for adults (16–65 years) with specified neurological impairment codes were extracted, cleaned and divided into ‘Sudden-onset’ conditions: (Stroke (n = 12527), brain injury (n = 7565), spinal cord injury (SCI) (n = 3753), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) (n = 805)) and ‘Progressive/stable’ conditions (Progressive (n = 3750) and Cerebral palsy (n = 196)). Key outcomes included Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, length of stay (LOS), and discharge destination. RESULTS: Mean LOS ranged from 21–57 days with significant group differences in gender, source of admission and discharge destination. All six groups showed significant change (p<0.001) between admission and discharge that was likely to be clinically important across a range of items. Significant between-group differences were observed for FIM Motor and Cognitive change scores (Kruskal-Wallis p<0.001), and item-by-item analysis confirmed distinct patterns for each of the six groups. SCI and GBS patients were generally at the ceiling of the cognitive subscale. The ‘Progressive/stable’ conditions made smaller improvements in FIM score than the ‘Sudden-onset conditions’, but also had shorter LOS. CONCLUSION: All groups made gains in independence during admission, although pattern of change varied between conditions, and ceiling effects were observed in the FIM-cognitive subscale. Relative cost-efficiency between groups can only be indirectly inferred. Limitations of the current dataset are discussed, together with opportunities for expansion and further development. Public Library of Science 2015-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4500577/ /pubmed/26167877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132275 Text en © 2015 Turner-Stokes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Turner-Stokes, Lynne Vanderstay, Roxana Stevermuer, Tara Simmonds, Frances Khan, Fary Eagar, Kathy Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age |
title | Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age |
title_full | Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age |
title_short | Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age |
title_sort | comparison of rehabilitation outcomes for long term neurological conditions: a cohort analysis of the australian rehabilitation outcomes centre dataset for adults of working age |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4500577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26167877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132275 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT turnerstokeslynne comparisonofrehabilitationoutcomesforlongtermneurologicalconditionsacohortanalysisoftheaustralianrehabilitationoutcomescentredatasetforadultsofworkingage AT vanderstayroxana comparisonofrehabilitationoutcomesforlongtermneurologicalconditionsacohortanalysisoftheaustralianrehabilitationoutcomescentredatasetforadultsofworkingage AT stevermuertara comparisonofrehabilitationoutcomesforlongtermneurologicalconditionsacohortanalysisoftheaustralianrehabilitationoutcomescentredatasetforadultsofworkingage AT simmondsfrances comparisonofrehabilitationoutcomesforlongtermneurologicalconditionsacohortanalysisoftheaustralianrehabilitationoutcomescentredatasetforadultsofworkingage AT khanfary comparisonofrehabilitationoutcomesforlongtermneurologicalconditionsacohortanalysisoftheaustralianrehabilitationoutcomescentredatasetforadultsofworkingage AT eagarkathy comparisonofrehabilitationoutcomesforlongtermneurologicalconditionsacohortanalysisoftheaustralianrehabilitationoutcomescentredatasetforadultsofworkingage |