Cargando…

Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare outcomes from in-patient rehabilitation (IPR) in working-aged adults across different groups of long-term neurological conditions, as defined by the UK National Service Framework. DESIGN: Analysis of a large Australian prospectively collected dataset for completed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turner-Stokes, Lynne, Vanderstay, Roxana, Stevermuer, Tara, Simmonds, Frances, Khan, Fary, Eagar, Kathy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4500577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26167877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132275
_version_ 1782380935272988672
author Turner-Stokes, Lynne
Vanderstay, Roxana
Stevermuer, Tara
Simmonds, Frances
Khan, Fary
Eagar, Kathy
author_facet Turner-Stokes, Lynne
Vanderstay, Roxana
Stevermuer, Tara
Simmonds, Frances
Khan, Fary
Eagar, Kathy
author_sort Turner-Stokes, Lynne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare outcomes from in-patient rehabilitation (IPR) in working-aged adults across different groups of long-term neurological conditions, as defined by the UK National Service Framework. DESIGN: Analysis of a large Australian prospectively collected dataset for completed IPR episodes (n = 28,596) from 2003-2012. METHODS: De-identified data for adults (16–65 years) with specified neurological impairment codes were extracted, cleaned and divided into ‘Sudden-onset’ conditions: (Stroke (n = 12527), brain injury (n = 7565), spinal cord injury (SCI) (n = 3753), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) (n = 805)) and ‘Progressive/stable’ conditions (Progressive (n = 3750) and Cerebral palsy (n = 196)). Key outcomes included Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, length of stay (LOS), and discharge destination. RESULTS: Mean LOS ranged from 21–57 days with significant group differences in gender, source of admission and discharge destination. All six groups showed significant change (p<0.001) between admission and discharge that was likely to be clinically important across a range of items. Significant between-group differences were observed for FIM Motor and Cognitive change scores (Kruskal-Wallis p<0.001), and item-by-item analysis confirmed distinct patterns for each of the six groups. SCI and GBS patients were generally at the ceiling of the cognitive subscale. The ‘Progressive/stable’ conditions made smaller improvements in FIM score than the ‘Sudden-onset conditions’, but also had shorter LOS. CONCLUSION: All groups made gains in independence during admission, although pattern of change varied between conditions, and ceiling effects were observed in the FIM-cognitive subscale. Relative cost-efficiency between groups can only be indirectly inferred. Limitations of the current dataset are discussed, together with opportunities for expansion and further development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4500577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45005772015-07-17 Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age Turner-Stokes, Lynne Vanderstay, Roxana Stevermuer, Tara Simmonds, Frances Khan, Fary Eagar, Kathy PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare outcomes from in-patient rehabilitation (IPR) in working-aged adults across different groups of long-term neurological conditions, as defined by the UK National Service Framework. DESIGN: Analysis of a large Australian prospectively collected dataset for completed IPR episodes (n = 28,596) from 2003-2012. METHODS: De-identified data for adults (16–65 years) with specified neurological impairment codes were extracted, cleaned and divided into ‘Sudden-onset’ conditions: (Stroke (n = 12527), brain injury (n = 7565), spinal cord injury (SCI) (n = 3753), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) (n = 805)) and ‘Progressive/stable’ conditions (Progressive (n = 3750) and Cerebral palsy (n = 196)). Key outcomes included Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, length of stay (LOS), and discharge destination. RESULTS: Mean LOS ranged from 21–57 days with significant group differences in gender, source of admission and discharge destination. All six groups showed significant change (p<0.001) between admission and discharge that was likely to be clinically important across a range of items. Significant between-group differences were observed for FIM Motor and Cognitive change scores (Kruskal-Wallis p<0.001), and item-by-item analysis confirmed distinct patterns for each of the six groups. SCI and GBS patients were generally at the ceiling of the cognitive subscale. The ‘Progressive/stable’ conditions made smaller improvements in FIM score than the ‘Sudden-onset conditions’, but also had shorter LOS. CONCLUSION: All groups made gains in independence during admission, although pattern of change varied between conditions, and ceiling effects were observed in the FIM-cognitive subscale. Relative cost-efficiency between groups can only be indirectly inferred. Limitations of the current dataset are discussed, together with opportunities for expansion and further development. Public Library of Science 2015-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4500577/ /pubmed/26167877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132275 Text en © 2015 Turner-Stokes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Turner-Stokes, Lynne
Vanderstay, Roxana
Stevermuer, Tara
Simmonds, Frances
Khan, Fary
Eagar, Kathy
Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age
title Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age
title_full Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age
title_fullStr Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age
title_short Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age
title_sort comparison of rehabilitation outcomes for long term neurological conditions: a cohort analysis of the australian rehabilitation outcomes centre dataset for adults of working age
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4500577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26167877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132275
work_keys_str_mv AT turnerstokeslynne comparisonofrehabilitationoutcomesforlongtermneurologicalconditionsacohortanalysisoftheaustralianrehabilitationoutcomescentredatasetforadultsofworkingage
AT vanderstayroxana comparisonofrehabilitationoutcomesforlongtermneurologicalconditionsacohortanalysisoftheaustralianrehabilitationoutcomescentredatasetforadultsofworkingage
AT stevermuertara comparisonofrehabilitationoutcomesforlongtermneurologicalconditionsacohortanalysisoftheaustralianrehabilitationoutcomescentredatasetforadultsofworkingage
AT simmondsfrances comparisonofrehabilitationoutcomesforlongtermneurologicalconditionsacohortanalysisoftheaustralianrehabilitationoutcomescentredatasetforadultsofworkingage
AT khanfary comparisonofrehabilitationoutcomesforlongtermneurologicalconditionsacohortanalysisoftheaustralianrehabilitationoutcomescentredatasetforadultsofworkingage
AT eagarkathy comparisonofrehabilitationoutcomesforlongtermneurologicalconditionsacohortanalysisoftheaustralianrehabilitationoutcomescentredatasetforadultsofworkingage