Cargando…
Bias in the use of randomized trials for carotid stenosis management
BACKGROUND: Carotid artery procedures, such as surgery and stenting, although associated with significant risks and costs, are often recommended in guidelines which cite12- to 34-year-old randomized trial evidence of benefit; however, these recommendations exist although there is no evidence these p...
Autor principal: | Abbott, A.L. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4500838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26190904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00772-015-0036-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of long-term results of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis
por: Demirel, S., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Ultrasound diagnostics of renal artery stenosis: Stenosis criteria, CEUS and recurrent in-stent stenosis
por: Schäberle, W., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Why I use both prospective randomized trials and registry data when choosing the personalized treatment of an AAA patient
por: Shah, M. D., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic: Management and vaccination strategies in The Netherlands
por: van der Sande, M.A.B., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Therapie von Komplikationen und nichtpharmakologisches Management der idiopathischen pulmonalen Fibrose
por: Gläser, S., et al.
Publicado: (2020)