Cargando…

Velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed-loop BCI arm-reaching task

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) that convert brain-recorded neural signals into intended movement commands could eventually be combined with Functional Electrical Stimulation to allow individuals with Spinal Cord Injury to regain effective and intuitive control of their paralyzed limbs. To accelera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liao, James Y., Kirsch, Robert F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4500927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26236225
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2015.00084
_version_ 1782380980714078208
author Liao, James Y.
Kirsch, Robert F.
author_facet Liao, James Y.
Kirsch, Robert F.
author_sort Liao, James Y.
collection PubMed
description Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) that convert brain-recorded neural signals into intended movement commands could eventually be combined with Functional Electrical Stimulation to allow individuals with Spinal Cord Injury to regain effective and intuitive control of their paralyzed limbs. To accelerate the development of such an approach, we developed a model of closed-loop BCI control of arm movements that (1) generates realistic arm movements (based on experimentally measured, visually-guided movements with real-time error correction), (2) simulates cortical neurons with firing properties consistent with literature reports, and (3) decodes intended movements from the noisy neural ensemble. With this model we explored (1) the relative utility of neurons tuned for different movement parameters (position, velocity, and goal) and (2) the utility of recording from larger numbers of neurons—critical issues for technology development and for determining appropriate brain areas for recording. We simulated arm movements that could be practically restored to individuals with severe paralysis, i.e., movements from an armrest to a volume in front of the person. Performance was evaluated by calculating the smallest movement endpoint target radius within which the decoded cursor position could dwell for 1 s. Our results show that goal, position, and velocity neurons all contribute to improve performance. However, velocity neurons enabled smaller targets to be reached in shorter amounts of time than goal or position neurons. Increasing the number of neurons also improved performance, although performance saturated at 30–50 neurons for most neuron types. Overall, our work presents a closed-loop BCI simulator that models error corrections and the firing properties of various movement-related neurons that can be easily modified to incorporate different neural properties. We anticipate that this kind of tool will be important for development of future BCIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4500927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45009272015-07-31 Velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed-loop BCI arm-reaching task Liao, James Y. Kirsch, Robert F. Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) that convert brain-recorded neural signals into intended movement commands could eventually be combined with Functional Electrical Stimulation to allow individuals with Spinal Cord Injury to regain effective and intuitive control of their paralyzed limbs. To accelerate the development of such an approach, we developed a model of closed-loop BCI control of arm movements that (1) generates realistic arm movements (based on experimentally measured, visually-guided movements with real-time error correction), (2) simulates cortical neurons with firing properties consistent with literature reports, and (3) decodes intended movements from the noisy neural ensemble. With this model we explored (1) the relative utility of neurons tuned for different movement parameters (position, velocity, and goal) and (2) the utility of recording from larger numbers of neurons—critical issues for technology development and for determining appropriate brain areas for recording. We simulated arm movements that could be practically restored to individuals with severe paralysis, i.e., movements from an armrest to a volume in front of the person. Performance was evaluated by calculating the smallest movement endpoint target radius within which the decoded cursor position could dwell for 1 s. Our results show that goal, position, and velocity neurons all contribute to improve performance. However, velocity neurons enabled smaller targets to be reached in shorter amounts of time than goal or position neurons. Increasing the number of neurons also improved performance, although performance saturated at 30–50 neurons for most neuron types. Overall, our work presents a closed-loop BCI simulator that models error corrections and the firing properties of various movement-related neurons that can be easily modified to incorporate different neural properties. We anticipate that this kind of tool will be important for development of future BCIs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4500927/ /pubmed/26236225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2015.00084 Text en Copyright © 2015 Liao and Kirsch. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Liao, James Y.
Kirsch, Robert F.
Velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed-loop BCI arm-reaching task
title Velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed-loop BCI arm-reaching task
title_full Velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed-loop BCI arm-reaching task
title_fullStr Velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed-loop BCI arm-reaching task
title_full_unstemmed Velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed-loop BCI arm-reaching task
title_short Velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed-loop BCI arm-reaching task
title_sort velocity neurons improve performance more than goal or position neurons do in a simulated closed-loop bci arm-reaching task
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4500927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26236225
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2015.00084
work_keys_str_mv AT liaojamesy velocityneuronsimproveperformancemorethangoalorpositionneuronsdoinasimulatedclosedloopbciarmreachingtask
AT kirschrobertf velocityneuronsimproveperformancemorethangoalorpositionneuronsdoinasimulatedclosedloopbciarmreachingtask