Cargando…

Perioperative chemotherapy in the treatment of osteosarcoma: a 26-year single institution review

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy in the multimodality treatment of osteosarcoma has improved survival. Reported outcomes on adult patients are limited. Poor necrosis rates post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is considered an adverse prognostic factor and attempts have been made to improve survival in this g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Kane, G M, Cadoo, K A, Walsh, E M, Emerson, R, Dervan, P, O’Keane, C, Hurson, B, O’Toole, G, Dudeney, S, Kavanagh, E, Eustace, S, Carney, D N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26175892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13569-015-0032-0
_version_ 1782380999947059200
author O’Kane, G M
Cadoo, K A
Walsh, E M
Emerson, R
Dervan, P
O’Keane, C
Hurson, B
O’Toole, G
Dudeney, S
Kavanagh, E
Eustace, S
Carney, D N
author_facet O’Kane, G M
Cadoo, K A
Walsh, E M
Emerson, R
Dervan, P
O’Keane, C
Hurson, B
O’Toole, G
Dudeney, S
Kavanagh, E
Eustace, S
Carney, D N
author_sort O’Kane, G M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy in the multimodality treatment of osteosarcoma has improved survival. Reported outcomes on adult patients are limited. Poor necrosis rates post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is considered an adverse prognostic factor and attempts have been made to improve survival in this group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult and young adult patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma between January 1986 and August 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients identified were stratified according to stage (localised or metastatic) and age (≤40 and >40 years). Event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were determined. In patients with localised disease ≤40 years, survival was assessed according to necrosis rates post NAC (<90 and ≥90%). NAC consisted of two cycles of methotrexate alternating with doxorubicin/cisplatin (MAP) followed by definitive surgery. Those with ≥90% tumour necrosis continued on MAP. Patients with <90% necrosis received ifosfamide and etoposide (IE) post operatively. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were reviewed and 97 were included. Median age was 23 years (range 16–75) and 70% of patients were male. Five year EFS and OS across all groups was 57% and 63% respectively. Of the patients with localised disease (N = 81), 5-year overall survival (OS), with a median follow up of 7 years (2–26) was 70% (p < 0.0001). Patients aged 16–40 (N = 68) with localised osteosarcoma had a significantly improved 5-year OS (74%) compared to those >40 years (N = 13) (42%) (p = 0.004). Of the 68 patients with localised osteosarcoma ≤40 years, 62 were evaluated according to necrosis rates post MAP. In 33 patients who achieved ≥90% necrosis and continued MAP, 5-year OS was 82%. In 29 patients who had <90% tumour necrosis and received adjuvant IE, 5-year OS was 68% (p = 0.15). Multivariate analysis confirmed age and stage as prognostic factors but not poor necrosis rates in our treated population. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival outcomes in a predominantly adult Irish population are similar to large reported trials. Age and stage at diagnosis are prognostic. Postoperative ifosfamide/etoposide alone in patients with poor necrosis rates is a feasible regimen, but its role in the adjuvant setting remains uncertain. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13569-015-0032-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4501053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45010532015-07-15 Perioperative chemotherapy in the treatment of osteosarcoma: a 26-year single institution review O’Kane, G M Cadoo, K A Walsh, E M Emerson, R Dervan, P O’Keane, C Hurson, B O’Toole, G Dudeney, S Kavanagh, E Eustace, S Carney, D N Clin Sarcoma Res Research BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy in the multimodality treatment of osteosarcoma has improved survival. Reported outcomes on adult patients are limited. Poor necrosis rates post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is considered an adverse prognostic factor and attempts have been made to improve survival in this group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult and young adult patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma between January 1986 and August 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients identified were stratified according to stage (localised or metastatic) and age (≤40 and >40 years). Event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were determined. In patients with localised disease ≤40 years, survival was assessed according to necrosis rates post NAC (<90 and ≥90%). NAC consisted of two cycles of methotrexate alternating with doxorubicin/cisplatin (MAP) followed by definitive surgery. Those with ≥90% tumour necrosis continued on MAP. Patients with <90% necrosis received ifosfamide and etoposide (IE) post operatively. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were reviewed and 97 were included. Median age was 23 years (range 16–75) and 70% of patients were male. Five year EFS and OS across all groups was 57% and 63% respectively. Of the patients with localised disease (N = 81), 5-year overall survival (OS), with a median follow up of 7 years (2–26) was 70% (p < 0.0001). Patients aged 16–40 (N = 68) with localised osteosarcoma had a significantly improved 5-year OS (74%) compared to those >40 years (N = 13) (42%) (p = 0.004). Of the 68 patients with localised osteosarcoma ≤40 years, 62 were evaluated according to necrosis rates post MAP. In 33 patients who achieved ≥90% necrosis and continued MAP, 5-year OS was 82%. In 29 patients who had <90% tumour necrosis and received adjuvant IE, 5-year OS was 68% (p = 0.15). Multivariate analysis confirmed age and stage as prognostic factors but not poor necrosis rates in our treated population. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival outcomes in a predominantly adult Irish population are similar to large reported trials. Age and stage at diagnosis are prognostic. Postoperative ifosfamide/etoposide alone in patients with poor necrosis rates is a feasible regimen, but its role in the adjuvant setting remains uncertain. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13569-015-0032-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4501053/ /pubmed/26175892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13569-015-0032-0 Text en © O'Kane et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
O’Kane, G M
Cadoo, K A
Walsh, E M
Emerson, R
Dervan, P
O’Keane, C
Hurson, B
O’Toole, G
Dudeney, S
Kavanagh, E
Eustace, S
Carney, D N
Perioperative chemotherapy in the treatment of osteosarcoma: a 26-year single institution review
title Perioperative chemotherapy in the treatment of osteosarcoma: a 26-year single institution review
title_full Perioperative chemotherapy in the treatment of osteosarcoma: a 26-year single institution review
title_fullStr Perioperative chemotherapy in the treatment of osteosarcoma: a 26-year single institution review
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative chemotherapy in the treatment of osteosarcoma: a 26-year single institution review
title_short Perioperative chemotherapy in the treatment of osteosarcoma: a 26-year single institution review
title_sort perioperative chemotherapy in the treatment of osteosarcoma: a 26-year single institution review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26175892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13569-015-0032-0
work_keys_str_mv AT okanegm perioperativechemotherapyinthetreatmentofosteosarcomaa26yearsingleinstitutionreview
AT cadooka perioperativechemotherapyinthetreatmentofosteosarcomaa26yearsingleinstitutionreview
AT walshem perioperativechemotherapyinthetreatmentofosteosarcomaa26yearsingleinstitutionreview
AT emersonr perioperativechemotherapyinthetreatmentofosteosarcomaa26yearsingleinstitutionreview
AT dervanp perioperativechemotherapyinthetreatmentofosteosarcomaa26yearsingleinstitutionreview
AT okeanec perioperativechemotherapyinthetreatmentofosteosarcomaa26yearsingleinstitutionreview
AT hursonb perioperativechemotherapyinthetreatmentofosteosarcomaa26yearsingleinstitutionreview
AT otooleg perioperativechemotherapyinthetreatmentofosteosarcomaa26yearsingleinstitutionreview
AT dudeneys perioperativechemotherapyinthetreatmentofosteosarcomaa26yearsingleinstitutionreview
AT kavanaghe perioperativechemotherapyinthetreatmentofosteosarcomaa26yearsingleinstitutionreview
AT eustaces perioperativechemotherapyinthetreatmentofosteosarcomaa26yearsingleinstitutionreview
AT carneydn perioperativechemotherapyinthetreatmentofosteosarcomaa26yearsingleinstitutionreview